Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "m4 scripts ignore user-supplied CFLAGS and LDFLAGS"
2008 Feb 23
0
Fwd: m4 scripts ignore user-supplied CFLAGS and LDFLAGS
Hi Alexander,
no, I am not responsible for this! It's true that I created the
scripts in m4/, but I only copied what was previously in configure.in.
Try:
svn up -r2 configure.in
and you'll see that the code in question has been there since the
beginning of SVN time (line 175).
I cannot say why it was done that way. Probably because nobody needed
a more general mechanism. Using
2009 Dec 15
1
patch for m4/nut_check_libnetsnmp.m4
It looks like the change to m4/nut_check_libnetsnmp.m4 in r1968 broke
the test on at least Solaris 10. Here is one possible fix.
----------------------------
--- m4/nut_check_libnetsnmp.m4.old 2009-12-15 09:30:48.000000000 -0800
+++ m4/nut_check_libnetsnmp.m4 2009-12-15 11:12:15.291295000 -0800
@@ -9,7 +9,8 @@
if test -z "${nut_have_libnetsnmp_seen}"; then
2008 Jan 13
2
new features on Testing branch (was: Belkin F6H375 not seen by nut 2.2.1)
[moving this thread to nut-upsdev]
On Jan 12, 2008 5:54 PM, Alexander I. Gordeev <lasaine at lvk.cs.msu.su> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:30:37 +0300, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > when you figure this out, can we make sure that we know which
> > changesets would need to be back-ported to branches/Testing (since
> > that is where we would
2008 Jan 13
2
new features on Testing branch (was: Belkin F6H375 not seen by nut 2.2.1)
[moving this thread to nut-upsdev]
On Jan 12, 2008 5:54 PM, Alexander I. Gordeev <lasaine at lvk.cs.msu.su> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 01:30:37 +0300, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > when you figure this out, can we make sure that we know which
> > changesets would need to be back-ported to branches/Testing (since
> > that is where we would
2010 Jan 19
2
PowerCOM - HID PDC status
Citeren Alexander Gordeev <lasaine op lvk.cs.msu.su>:
> I've received the units. Are there any special things I should test or
> just the standard NUT setup?
They should be detected out of the box (with the latest version from
the trunk) through the 'usbhid-ups' driver. Note that I just added
some additional commands to enable|disable|mute the beeper of the UPS.
2007 Feb 08
3
Re: [nut-commits] svn commit r801 - in branches/megatec-usb: . drivers
Hi Alexander,
thanks for your good work on the megatec_usb driver. I have made a few
more (cosmetic) changes.
Is the driver now working stably for your device? In particular, do
the instant commands (and particularly "upsdrvctl -k") work properly?
In this case, we could hopefully mark the device as "supported" and
merge the driver to the main branch.
There is still the
2009 Jun 08
2
about nut revision 1289
Hi Carlos,
How do you do? :)
Can you please clarify the change introduced by the subj
(http://boxster.ghz.cc/projects/nut/changeset/1289)? I need to know in
particular why did you add these intervals between sending a command
and reading the response. They are the root of weird problems with
megatec_usb. Can I safely remove READ_PACE and usleep-s?
I tried to search the archives and found the
2006 Nov 14
1
Krauler UP-M500VA investigation
Hi, All!
I've recently bought an UPS. It is Krauler UP-M500VA, it has USB
port and is a HID device.
But as I discovered the only HID application it supports is 0x860004,
so it isn't claimed by both hidups and newhidups drivers, because it
uses a vendor-specific values. I tried to discover values in that x86
page, but I failed. How can I do it?
And after I get values how to understand
2008 Sep 11
2
Ippon device does not work
I have an UPS, that claims to be IPPon Back Power Pro 700. I'm trying to
connect it using USB.
lsusb -v says:
Bus 1 Device 3: ID 06da:0003 Phoenixtec Power Co., Ltd
Device Descriptor:
bLength 18
bDescriptorType 1
bcdUSB 1.10
bDeviceClass 0 (Defined at Interface level)
bDeviceSubClass 0
bDeviceProtocol 0
2007 May 26
3
[nut-commits] svn commit r924 - in trunk: . data
Does this require a new entry in scripts/hotplug/* and scripts/udev/*?
-- Peter
Alexander Gordeev wrote:
>
> Author: agordeev-guest
> Date: Sat May 26 12:04:26 2007
> New Revision: 924
>
> Log:
> data/driver.list: added SVEN Power Smart RM 2000 to the list.
>
> Modified:
> trunk/ChangeLog
> trunk/data/driver.list
>
> Modified: trunk/ChangeLog
>
2006 Dec 30
2
megatec over USB - using Andrey Lelikov's approach
Hi All,
finally, I've got time and resources for development. Unfortunately I
couldn't
afford playing with my UPS because it was used permanently, but now it's
ok.
I've checked out cureent trunc and I see that Andrey Lelikov's changes
haven't
been applied yet. What's wrong with them?
I think, he made a great job to simplify future support for this kind of
2007 Aug 13
2
[nut-commits] svn commit r1049 - in trunk: . drivers
Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> Author: agordeev-guest
> Date: Mon Aug 13 13:09:43 2007
> New Revision: 1049
>
> Log:
> drivers/megatec_usb.c: added credits to the banner message.
Is this really needed/desirable? I think this kind of information needs
to be put in the AUTHORS document. There are many more people on this
list that put a lot of effort in NUT, without claiming credit
2008 Dec 02
2
update instructions for compiling trunk
Hi,
Please update the instructions for compiling trunk on the website:
replace 'autoreconf' with 'autoreconf --install' because it stopped working
after r1561.
--
Alexander
2006 Nov 19
2
SSL flags (was Re: [nut-commits] svn commit r593 - branches/deb_fixes_for_trunk)
Peter,
Any objections to adding this to the trunk? When I run 'ldd upsc'
without this patch, it lists the OpenSSL libraries, and the default
./configure setting is to not use OpenSSL.
- Charles
> Log:
> If we are not using SSL_CFLAGS or SSL_LDFLAGS, do not add the OpenSSL libraries
> to all of the binaries.
>
>
> Modified: branches/deb_fixes_for_trunk/configure.in
>
2009 Jun 17
2
nut: megatec_usb shows error "ser_send_pace: Device detached" on periodically checks
Hi Alexey,
Please post the output of 'lsusb' and
'megatec_usb -a sven_625 -u nut -DDDDD'.
On Monday 15 June 2009 14:32:16 you wrote:
> Package: nut
> Version: 2.4.1-3
> Severity: normal
>
> I have a SVEN Pro+ 625 ups that uses megatec_usb driver.
> In ups.conf I describe it like:
> [sven_625]
> driver = megatec_usb
> port = auto
> desc =
2018 Aug 31
0
Re: [PATCH] build: Pass CFLAGS & LDFLAGS to final supermin link (RHBZ#1624175).
On Friday, 31 August 2018 10:03:31 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> We also use -runtime-variant _pic which selects the OCaml runtime
> linked with -fPIC. This will cause a performance regression on i686
> although that probably doesn't matter now.
This is for supermin, right?
> A bigger issue is that it will stop supermin from building with older
> versions of OCaml (<=
2007 Dec 06
1
[PATCH] Makefile: CFLAGS, LDFLAGS
Split CFLAGS into CFLAGS (user part) and AM_CFLAGS (not-so-user part;
variable name taken from automake, but otherwise no relation).
Also add LDFLAGS.
This allows me to use `make CFLAGS="-O2 -fPIE" LDFLAGS="-pie"` without
dropping the other important (AM_CFLAGS) flags.
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>
---
btrfs-progs/Makefile | 17
2007 May 17
3
Belkin USB UPSes
I just bought a pair of Belkin USB UPSes -- F6C1200-UNV and F6C550-AVR --
and installed the latest version of nut under Ubuntu 7.04. I'm using
the F6C1200-UNV.
My system does see the device; dmesg says
[ 82.718428] usb 2-2: new low speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 2
[ 82.941189] usb 2-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
[ 83.036825] usbcore: registered new driver
2007 May 17
3
Belkin USB UPSes
I just bought a pair of Belkin USB UPSes -- F6C1200-UNV and F6C550-AVR --
and installed the latest version of nut under Ubuntu 7.04. I'm using
the F6C1200-UNV.
My system does see the device; dmesg says
[ 82.718428] usb 2-2: new low speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 2
[ 82.941189] usb 2-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
[ 83.036825] usbcore: registered new driver
2018 Aug 31
2
[PATCH] build: Pass CFLAGS & LDFLAGS to final supermin link (RHBZ#1624175).
We also use -runtime-variant _pic which selects the OCaml runtime
linked with -fPIC. This will cause a performance regression on i686
although that probably doesn't matter now.
A bigger issue is that it will stop supermin from building with older
versions of OCaml (<= 4.02.2). We might instead try detecting if it's
the old version in ./configure but that gets a bit fragile.
---