similar to: Voltage override in megatec and megatec-over-usb [was: Re: nut-2.0.5 megatec + Online Xanto]

Hello, all. Some time ago I bought myself a UPS which was advertised as USB-HID. It was a surprise to learn that while it definitely is recognized as USB device, the HID descriptor has no UPS pages at all. The only software it came with was a windows program written in visual basic. Trying to research this topic I found a reference to energizer USB ups driver and learned about variety of

Hi Jon, your patches are malformed because (presumably) your email client wrapped this lines. Could you please send these as a unified diff ("diff -u"), and send them in attachments, rather than as a copy-and-paste? Thanks, -- Peter Jon Gough wrote: > > Peter, > Here are the files I have worked on. I hope I have diff'd them > correctly. I have not touched the

Hi Alexander, How to megatec driver communication windows c++.NET or C#.net. Thanks. Yi?it YALNIZ?A -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20141023/2384ce84/attachment.html>

good new first: the megatec driverin 2.0.5 now works with the Online Xanto S3000R here - well, for the very basics. the UPS has NO way ofidentifying itself. It also does not respond to the power ratings query ("F"). I previously used a hacked up fentonups driver. This means the driver cannot figure out the battery voltage and thus no battery charge level, which is a problem in our

Citeren Arjen de Korte <adkorte-guest at alioth.debian.org>: > Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Mon Nov 24 13:13:44 2008 > New Revision: 1578 > > Log: > Use new usb_device_id_t and is_usb_device_supported() > for selection of the subdriver. Alexander, It would be nice if you could double check that I didn't horribly break something here. I don't expect any

Ok, I installed the ups, and installed nut, and /proc/bus/usb/devices says this T: Bus=03 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=01 Cnt=01 Dev#= 2 Spd=1.5 MxCh= 0 D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs= 1 P: Vendor=06da ProdID=0002 Rev= 0.01 S: Manufacturer=POWERWARE S: Product=Powerware UPS C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=80 MxPwr= 20mA I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=00 Prot=00

Dear Andreas, some googling revealed, you created a driver for the xanto series of online-usv.de. In what state it is currently? I've to manage a S2000 and would like to use nut for it, is it usable by now? Do you need another tester? TIA, Pete

Hello there. I use Online Xanto ups'es so I did some googling for their support in nut. Turns out that... - networkupstools.org talks about an 'optiups' driver in the development version (http://www.networkupstools.org/compat/dev.html - by the way, the web page says 'stable' in the title and headings just like the actual stable one) - Andreas Thienemann seems to have a

Good morning, i have an Xanto S1000 USV the Manufactor is ONLINE USV-Systeme AG. I tried all the buildin drivers, also the driver for the driver for the Generic UPS, nothing worked for this UPS so now my question has anyone else this UPS and functional driver? Thanks and Greets Dennis

Hi Henning, you should get in touch with Carlos, who his developing a generic megatec driver (available from svn: http://eu1.networkupstools.org/source.html) Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert - MGE UPS SYSTEMS - R&D Dpt Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~aquette/ OpenSource Developer -

please keep the list cc'ed when replying me. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andreas Thienemann <andreas@bawue.net> Date: 15 nov. 2005 15:36 Subject: Re: RE New xanto driver for NUT To: Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev@gmail.com> Hello Arnaud, On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Arnaud Quette wrote: > is there really a need to separate it from the megatec. > we're currently

please keep the list cc'ed when replying me. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andreas Thienemann <andreas@bawue.net> Date: 15 nov. 2005 15:36 Subject: Re: RE New xanto driver for NUT To: Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev@gmail.com> Hello Arnaud, On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Arnaud Quette wrote: > is there really a need to separate it from the megatec. > we're currently

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Arjen de Korte <nut+devel at de-korte.org> wrote: > Citeren Carlos Rodrigues <cefrodrigues at gmail.com>: > >> BTW, the patch has a small typo in one of the comments: "applied to >> battery.volage" :) > > I'll leave that up to you to correct. Since it is only a comment, it won't > be visible to innocent users

Hi, a few days ago, I bought some of those Mustek UPSes that have both a serial and a USB connector. Currently only the serial port is supported by the megatec driver. This works fine so far. Now I have seen there is a megatec_usb driver, which currently only supports 2 other UPSes. How can I help to find out whether the PowerMust might actually work with the megatec_usb driver? -- Regards,

On 2/9/07, Alexander Gordeev <agordeev-guest@alioth.debian.org> wrote: > + /* > + Still not implemented: > + 0x6 T<n> (don't know how to pass the parameter) > + 0x68 and 0x69 both cause shutdown after an undefined interval > + C (know nothing about this command) > + */ You don't know

Carlos, Have looked at the diff's between the trunk and Testing, I found that it would probably be very worthwhile to backport the driver from the trunk. As far as I can see, the driver in the trunk will allow for better debugging, which would be a welcome addition. Could you take care of that? Best regards, Arjen

Hi folks! We have a Powercom Vanguard 6000 running here. It seems to be supported by the megatec driver within nut. So I get everything out of it exept the battery status. When I run Nut, it says: Megatec protocol UPS detected [UPS Model 6K Ver Y1.3]. This UPS has an unsupported combination of battery voltage/number of batteries. The "battery.charge" value will be bogus. So I would

Hi, It took a while, but I've finally cleared my pending queue for the megatec driver and the result is the following set of patches. The changes are minor, just a couple of models to the compatibility list and a new parameter "sendpace" so that a user can change the default interval between command characters (which seems to be needed by at least one model). It builds,

Hello. In continuation to http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/2007-June/002880.html Inelt Monolith II 1000 (don't know about LT) actually requires sending shutdown command twice, with delay of 5 to 8 seconds, according to my experiments. The attached patch enables the megatec driver to repeat shutdown command with configurable delay (cmdrepeat, in milliseconds). Default

Hi, I am not sure if you are the list to hit with this, but NUT's megatec driver support ours "Numeric Digital 3000 sw" UPS - at least that's what it claims on front- at the Watcher telescope at Boyden Observatory / RSA. I wasn't able to find manufacturer, but it looks Numeric is some existing UPS factory. I did not receive any informations from manufacturer, so I believ