Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Fwd: IPv6 patch"
2004 Apr 01
1
[patch] net/rsync: problems in client name lookup code
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Originator: Alex Vasylenko
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: [patch] net/rsync: problems in client name lookup code
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Category: ports
>Class: sw-bug
>Release: FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p16 i386
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p16
>Description:
rsync does reverse name
2001 Aug 13
5
rsync ipv6 patch merge?
On 13 Aug 2001, "William F. Maton" <wmaton@ryouko.dgim.crc.ca> wrote:
> On 13 Aug 2001, Heikki Vatiainen wrote:
>
> > The rsync daemon we use is plain 2.4.6 patched with KAME rsync patch
> > rsync-246-v6-20000907.diff.gz [1]. It looks like there is a good
> > possibility to get IPv6 merged in, since just today a rsync developer
> > was asking if
2010 Nov 28
2
[PATCH] Use canonical hostname for DNS SSHFP lookup
In the current implementation, ssh always uses the hostname supplied by
the user directly for the SSHFP DNS record lookup. This causes problems
when using the domain search path, e.g. I have "search example.com" in my
resolv.conf and then do a "ssh host", I will connect to host.example.com,
but ssh will query the DNS for an SSHFP record of "host.", not
2005 Oct 20
1
Samba+LDAP Groups resolving problem
Hi,
I have managed to configure Samba+LDAP+smbldap-tools. Everything works
fine, except one strange problem is appearing.
When I connect with Windows tool UserManagerForDomains or I want to create
a share on a Wndows box I can see the users but no groups.
With UserManagerForDomains is see following:
Users: All the users
Groups: none, just description of Replicators Group and the
2007 Jan 06
3
Re: [nut-commits] svn commit r708 - in trunk: . clients server
With the Ipv6 patch (r708), I get:
upsclient.c: In function `upscli_connect':
upsclient.c:469: `AI_ADDRCONFIG' undeclared (first use in this function)
upsclient.c:469: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
upsclient.c:469: for each function it appears in.)
Even if it doesn't break IPv4 support, it may break portability, as
IPv6 seems to require specific functions that are
2002 Nov 05
2
2.5.6 release
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:37:00AM -0800, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 10 Oct 2002, "Green, Paul" <Paul.Green@stratus.com> wrote:
> > No new CVS messages have appeared on the rsync-cvs archives since August
> > 30th. This seems rather odd-- perhaps a daemon stopped working? If there
> > has truly been no activity since that date, I apologize for
> >
2007 Jan 06
1
Re: [nut-commits] svn commit r710 - in trunk: . clients server
Great, thanks Arjen! Now we need an autoconf test to set HAVE_IPV6
automatically. I will look into what functionality needs to be tested;
the test can be refined as problems arise later. -- Peter
Arjen de Korte wrote:
>
> Author: adkorte-guest
> Date: Sat Jan 6 19:39:08 2007
> New Revision: 710
>
> Modified:
> trunk/ChangeLog
> trunk/clients/upsc.c
>
2004 Feb 25
3
[patch] Correct configure test for sin_len to compile on Tru64 Unix
The last versions of rsync fail to compile on Tru64 Unix (alpha),
because of a typo in configure.in.
The problem is that the code in configure check for sockaddr.sa_len,
while the code uses sockaddr.sin_len. This patch fixes the problem.
Please include it in the next version of rsync.
diff -ur src-2.6.0/configure.in src-2.6.0-local/configure.in
--- src-2.6.0-local/configure.in
2007 Jan 08
2
Re: [nut-commits] svn commit r714 - in trunk: . server
OK, I have removed the autoconf test for s6_addr32 (which is no longer
used), and wrote a new test for IN6_IS_ADDR_V4MAPPED. The latter is
probably portable, but since we're already in the business of testing,
it does not hurt to do so.
Arjen, I wonder about server/access.c, line 60-61:
return (IN6_IS_ADDR_V4MAPPED(ip6) &&
((((const u_int32_t *)ip6)[3] &
2002 Jun 28
0
[Bug 316] New: ifdefs for systems without IPV6
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316
Summary: ifdefs for systems without IPV6
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: Other
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Build system
AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
ReportedBy:
2002 Oct 21
0
[Bug 418] New: Allow to build on systems without IPV6
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418
Summary: Allow to build on systems without IPV6
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: All
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: Miscellaneous
AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
1998 May 14
1
samba main cvs branch seems to be broken on 64-bit boxes.....
hi there :)
the code in util.c seems to have some bugs w/regard to compilation on
64-bit machines. in this case, the hardware is an Alpha running redhat
4.2 with pam turned off in the makefile.
i get a whole series of errors, all of which say "passing arg 'n' of
'function' from incompatible pointer type. in util.c, checked out of the
main branch the day before yesterday,
2001 Aug 07
1
do_pre_login() used before declared
do_pre_login() in session.c is used (in do_exec_pty()) before
it's declared, which is causing some problems for me.
please move it up a couple hundred lines in the file.
patch included for 0807 snapshot.
thanks,
wendy
% diff -u session.c.orig session.c.mod
--- session.c.orig Tue Aug 7 13:11:51 2001
+++ session.c.mod Tue Aug 7 16:21:07 2001
@@ -397,6 +397,34 @@
}
}
2015 Nov 14
2
[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] LLVM Social in Austin - Nov. 15?
Hearing no opinions to the contrary, let's say Banger's 6pm (tomorrow). Address and web site below. I submitted online for a reservation early this morning, and I'll try to get an updated head count on Sunday morning.
-Hal
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
On Nov 14, 2015 11:21 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
Did this ever get settled?
On Fri,
2000 Jan 18
1
Error when compiling for Solaris7
I cannot make openssh on Solaris.
The 'make' fails on the first file.
Here are the commands and the output.
Essentially, I pre-built EGD, SSL, and ran:
configure
make
make errors are listed at the bottom.
Can anyone help me get this compiled on Solaris7?
Steve
sdn at sprintlabs.com
./configure --prefix=/common --sysconfdir=/etc/ssh
--with-egd-pool=/common/bin/egd.pl
loading cache
2007 Jan 23
0
Re: Clicking noise using Speex built for TI C64+ DSP ofDaVinci Processor
Sorry everyone, but I figured it out; it's working now. The problem was in my monoToStereo and stereoToMono functions (the Linux OSS driver on the ARM
side only supports stereo so I had to convert it to mono before feeding it to Speex); also I had an alignment issue with my buffers I was using on the DSP
side. Thanks Jim/Jean-Marc for your help!
Regards,
Andy
----- Original Message ----
2006 Feb 05
2
R socket communication
Hello, I tried to code a R socket server but I did not succeed.
The problem is that once the R socket server is created,
I call the readLines function and then R gets blocked.
The client seems to work fine since I tested it with a PERL server.
I tried many combination of params in the socketConnection but
none of them worked.
I have seen some examples where the server sends something to a
client
2011 Aug 03
18
[Bug 734] New: Iptables on Arm Processor with Vanilla Kernel
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734
Summary: Iptables on Arm Processor with Vanilla Kernel
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: linux-2.6.x
Platform: arm
OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P5
Component: unknown
AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at
2015 Nov 13
2
[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] LLVM Social in Austin - Nov. 15?
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sebastian Pop" <spop at codeaurora.org>
> To: "James H Cownie" <james.h.cownie at intel.com>
> Cc: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "John Leidel (jleidel)" <jleidel at micron.com>, "LLVM Dev"
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at
2008 Jan 14
1
Jitter buffer latency
Hi Jean-Marc,
Thanks for your response. Given a worst case scenario, what is the "worst case" latency (in terms of Speex frames) that the jitter buffer algorithm will incur? We're trying to determine the worst case hard number. Sorry for unclear question below; what I was trying to ask is that given a worst case latency (which I'm asking in the first question) inherent in