similar to: Fwd: RE New xanto driver for NUT

Hi Henning, you should get in touch with Carlos, who his developing a generic megatec driver (available from svn: http://eu1.networkupstools.org/source.html) Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert - MGE UPS SYSTEMS - R&D Dpt Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~aquette/ OpenSource Developer -

Hi Arnaud, Hi Scott, Hi list, Here is a patch to support the Zinto D from ONLINE USV-Systeme AG. I already sent a version to Russell Kroll (2006-04-09), without no response and I cannot find support for Zinto in svn until now. I found a discussion on this list about the Xanto from ONLINE, but the Zinto seems to use different commands. The commands are quite similar to those for Opti-UPS, so I

Hi ups-devel, As I looked throw www.networkupstools.org site, haven't found any pointers where to send patches, so I hope this is the right place. (Please let me know weather this is the right place.) The patch contains a minor change in the logic of the driver, our Effekta MHD 3000 UPS continuously writes status data to the serial port, so one has to send a CR character and empty the

Hi Kirill, just to notify you that your al175 driver is being removed from the NUT tree, as of 2.4.0-pre1. if you wish to see it entering the tree again, please contact the Development mailing list to talk about it. Merry Christmas and happy New Year. Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://www.eaton.com/mgeops Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader -

Sorry for a bit longer delay than I anticipated, I was stuffed with the work. This is the next iteration of the patch adding some functionality to apcsmart driver, and relying on 'ignorelb' recently added. Follow up from previous thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org/msg02331.html Main differences is that V3 is split into many small patches, so the

This is 2nd version of the earlier patch featuring a few new features and fixes to the apcsmart driver, following the remarks in: http://www.mail-archive.com/nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org/msg02294.html Major changes from v1: - handle battery.charge and battery.runtime checks at main.c level - handle "immutable but writable" conflict gracefully at driver level -

This patch introduces a handful of new options, I mentioned earlier in: http://www.mail-archive.com/nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org/msg02088.html See the large commit message in the follow-up for the details and rationale. I realize it's a bit larger diff - so if it's required I can split it into few smaller ones. Michal Soltys (1): APC smart driver update and new features.

Hi, my UPS is a Best Fortress LI1420 with the monitoring master running fedora 7. I have to replace the manufacturer's software "Checkups II" because it's not working with releases after fc4. My choice is the nut package. But it isn't just installing rpm's and configure the parameter files. ? The first hurdle to take was realising the UPS doesn't send a prompt.

On 1/23/07, Henning Brauer <hb-nut@bsws.de> wrote: > good new first: the megatec driverin 2.0.5 now works with the Online > Xanto S3000R here - well, for the very basics. > > the UPS has NO way ofidentifying itself. It also does not respond to > the power ratings query ("F"). I previously used a hacked up fentonups > driver. This means the driver cannot figure out

Hello there. I use Online Xanto ups'es so I did some googling for their support in nut. Turns out that... - networkupstools.org talks about an 'optiups' driver in the development version (http://www.networkupstools.org/compat/dev.html - by the way, the web page says 'stable' in the title and headings just like the actual stable one) - Andreas Thienemann seems to have a

Good morning, i have an Xanto S1000 USV the Manufactor is ONLINE USV-Systeme AG. I tried all the buildin drivers, also the driver for the driver for the Generic UPS, nothing worked for this UPS so now my question has anyone else this UPS and functional driver? Thanks and Greets Dennis

Description: Replace many usleep and some sleep calls with nanosleep. usleep is stated in its manual page as removed by POSIX. Contrary to its predecessors, nanosleep semantics is well defined. The replacement, which is mostly in drivers, is untested. Supplements http://bugs.debian.org/633791. Last-Update: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 14:04:48 +0300 Index:

Fellows, time has come for a new NUT release: I'm planning on 2.6.1 next week (max Friday 27), and I'm currently processing remaining patches. If you have some more on your side, please send in. cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/ Debian Developer -

Hello all, OS name: FreeNAS 9.3 NUT version: 2.7.2 NUT installed method: Bundled with FreenNAS 9.3 Device: EATON 5SC 1000 (http://powerquality.eaton.com/Products-services/Backup-Power-UPS/5SC.aspx?cx=5&wtredirect=www.eaton.com/5SC&GUID=B81251A4-F34E-4373-94B3-B4FB3D0CBCA8) Problem description: This was originally reported as bug to FreeNAS

reported through launchpad: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/253999 the possible regression is between nut 2.0.1 (sarge) and 2.2.1 (confirmed Jamie?) @Arjen: it may be related to some of your changes there... @Jamie: we'll need some debug output from the drivers (-DDD) Arnaud

I have been running a Smart-UPS RT 3000 VA using nut successfully over the 940-0095B cable for a couple of years. I have just received a second unit, but it is slightly different in 3 ways that I have found so far. 1. It's a Smart-UPS RT 3000 XL 2. The 940-0095B cable now uses an RJ45 connector at the UPS end. 3. It now requires a baud rate of 9600 instead of the 2400 used previously.

please keep the list cc'ed when replying me. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andreas Thienemann <andreas@bawue.net> Date: 15 nov. 2005 15:36 Subject: Re: RE New xanto driver for NUT To: Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev@gmail.com> Hello Arnaud, On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Arnaud Quette wrote: > is there really a need to separate it from the megatec. > we're currently

please keep the list cc'ed when replying me. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andreas Thienemann <andreas@bawue.net> Date: 15 nov. 2005 15:36 Subject: Re: RE New xanto driver for NUT To: Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev@gmail.com> Hello Arnaud, On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Arnaud Quette wrote: > is there really a need to separate it from the megatec. > we're currently

Citeren Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev at gmail.com>: > Author: keyson-guest > Date: Wed Feb 4 15:03:36 2009 > New Revision: 1765 > > Log: > - Added mocrodowell.c/h into drivers/. add man/microdowell.8. Adjusted > drivers/Makefile.am and man/makefile.am. Adjusted the code for 2.4.0 in the > microdowell.c. Besides the things already mentioned by others and the obvious

Hi, I'm not the maintainter for the "megatec_usb" driver (in fact, I'm no longer maintainer for the base "megatec" either), so I don't really know the status for that particular UPS. I'm forwarding this to the NUT mailing-list though. Regards, -- Carlos Rodrigues On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Adrian Czerniak <adrian.czerniak at becomo.com> wrote: