Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Liebert PowerSure PSA 500"
2005 Aug 30
0
Liebert PowerSure PSA 500
[FAQ on USB-connected UPSes]
> Remember: this is brand new *experimental* software and is probably
> very broken. Do us a favor and report successes or failures to
> the mailing lists.
No problem ... :
UPS: Liebert PowerSure PSA 500
NUT: Version 2.0.2
Kernel: 2.6.11.5, with CONFIG_USB_HID, CONFIG_USB_HIDINPUT, and
CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV compiled in (statically)
2009 Nov 10
1
[PATCH] Add support for Liebert PowerSure PSA to liebert-hid.c
This patch adds support for the following ups to liebert-hid.c:
$ lsusb | grep Liebert
Bus 007 Device 005: ID 10af:0001 Liebert Corp. PowerSure PSA UPS
Using this patch, I'm able to obtain information about the ups via
upsc:
$ upsc upsname
battery.charge: 100
battery.runtime: 1012
battery.type: PbAc
battery.voltage: 1172
battery.voltage.nominal: 12
driver.name: usbhid-ups
2005 Sep 07
3
Liebert PowerSure PSA 500
Hello everyone, Charles suggested (about a week ago) that I repost to
this list. I took a moment to run some additional tests ...
The basics:
-- UPS: Liebert PowerSure PSA 500 (from the 230 VAC / 50 Hz line)
-- Kernel: 2.6.11.5 (from sources), USB support (down to and including
CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV) compiled in statically (not as a module)
-- Rest of OS: Basically still from the original SuSE
2007 Jul 03
2
Help needed: LIEBERT PowerSure Personal XT - USB interface
Hi,
I have a Liebert PowerSure Personal XT that I have connected via its USB interface.
lsusb shows that it is there and when I plugged in I got the kernel messages:
Jul 3 11:25:37 mint kernel: usb 2-2.2: new low speed USB device using address 4
Jul 3 11:25:38 mint kernel: hiddev96: USB HID v1.11 Device [LIEBERT PowerSure Personal XT] on usb-0000:00:10.0-2.2
The documentation suggests that
2010 Apr 23
1
Liebert powersure psp
Hi,
I have a Liebert POWERSURE PSP connected via USB. Cleanly built and
installed from source nut-2.4.3.tar.gz
using kernel 2.6.30.5
#cat /proc/bus/usb
T: Bus=02 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=00 Cnt=01 Dev#= 2 Spd=1.5 MxCh= 0
D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs= 1
P: Vendor=10af ProdID=0003 Rev= 0.00
S: Manufacturer=Liebert
S: Product=Liebert PSP 350 FW: 02
S:
2013 Feb 19
1
UPS Liebert GXT-3
Hello,
I (now) own an Emerson Liebert GXT3 6000VA conected via USB. I've searched
the web trying to configure nut (nut-2.6.5-1.el6.x86_64 epel rpm on CentOS
6.3) to monitor the UPS, but couldn't find a successful configuration. I'm
running kernel 2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.x86_64.
The UPS is connected with an USB cable:
Bus 004 Device 002: ID 10af:0008 Liebert Corp. PowerSure Interactive
2011 May 30
2
UPS Liebert GXT3 config
Hi all,
I?ve a UPS Liebert GXT3 500-3000VA with USB port.
I?ve install NUT version 2.2.2 from repository packages for Debian Lenny.
Linux kernel 2.6.26
I?ve try to use usbhid-ups driver in ups.conf
[liebert]
driver=usbhid-ups
port=/dev/usb/hiddev0
Debian get the usb:
# lsusb -v
Bus 001 Device 002: ID 10af:0008 Liebert Corp. PowerSure Interactive UPS
Device Descriptor:
bLength
2014 Apr 03
2
<Liebert> <PowerSure PSI 1440> supported by <?>
nothing appens. The output is exactly the same as below (attached screen
with freenas config)
[image: Immagine in linea 2]
2014-04-03 13:16 GMT+02:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>:
> please reply to the list. thanks!
>
> See below.
>
> On Apr 3, 2014, at 3:10 AM, Daniele Borghesi wrote:
>
> thanks for your reply.* I'm running the latest version of
2014 Apr 03
0
<Liebert> <PowerSure PSI 1440> supported by <?>
please reply to the list. thanks!
See below.
On Apr 3, 2014, at 3:10 AM, Daniele Borghesi wrote:
> thanks for your reply. I'm running the latest version of FreeNAS based on 9.2 with NUT 2.7.1
>
> [root at archivio ~]# uname -a
> FreeBSD archivio.dannyb78.home 9.2-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE-p3 #0 r262572+
> 38751c8: Thu
2023 Jul 18
0
Liebert PSA 1500 (500, 1000, 650, ...)
Hello
The page https://networkupstools.org/ddl/Liebert/PSA_1500.html don't
contain all information about UPS series PSA.
First, the variable "*device.serial*" is dummy, it is always empty , and
"*ups.serial*" also always empty.
Second, configuration file for the all UPS "PSA" contain these lines:
[PSA]
??? driver = "usbhid-ups"
?? ?port =
2014 Apr 02
3
[HCL] <Liebert> <PowerSure PSI 1440> supported by <?>
Hello, I need help configuring my USB connected UPS "Emerson Power Liebert
PowerSure PSI 1440" to my freebsd machine, using NUT.
here's the manufacturer's product page
http://www.emersonnetworkpower.com/en-US/Products/ACPower/Pages/LiebertPowerSurePSILineInteractiveUPS10003000VA.aspx
I'm not a BSD expert, so please ask me for any information you need.
regards
Daniele
2023 Dec 04
1
Liebert UPS driver
Replaced ups with a new Liebert UPS and it seems the device may not be known to nut. Below is output of lsusb:
ID 10af:0002 Liebert Corp. PowerSure PST UPS
Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20231204/7c08a727/attachment.htm>
2013 Aug 11
0
FW: Fwd: Liebert PSA UPS problem.
Anyone have any advice what I need to do next?
Regards,
Paul.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nut-upsuser
[mailto:nut-upsuser-bounces+paul=smithp.co.uk at lists.alioth.debian.org] On
Behalf Of Charles Lepple
Sent: 02 August 2013 11:36
To: nut-upsuser list
Subject: [Nut-upsuser] Fwd: Liebert PSA UPS problem.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Paul Smith"
> Subject: Liebert PSA
2011 Feb 03
3
Status OB (on battery) when polling a Liebert PSA
Hi all,
This is my first experience with NUT.
I'm trying to test a Liebert PSA 1500 UPS, connected via USB to a single PC.
I have followed the instruction in the "Configuration" section of the online
user manual.
Everything seems to be fine, except that, when I run "upsc
liebert at localhostups.status", it retuns "OB", even if the UPS is
currently online.
Here
2014 Oct 18
0
Liebert PSA "On Battery" report
Likely because 2.6.3 is not a current release. 2.7.2 (or 3?) is rhe current version, and it makes little sense to backport changes.
Nut is a trivial compile . . . 'Use the source, Luke . . .'
- Tim
On October 17, 2014 6:05:35 PM CDT, Derek Harding <derek at lagham.org.uk> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Back in 2011, it was reported that Liebert PSA devices persist in
>reporting OB
2014 Oct 17
2
Liebert PSA "On Battery" report
Hi,
Back in 2011, it was reported that Liebert PSA devices persist in
reporting OB (On Battery) when using usbhid-ups regardless of the actual
state. Pier Paolo did some work (2011) which reportedly solved the
issue. However, that doesn't seem to have reached mainstream and I now
face the same problem.
I'm using NUT 2.6.3 with a new Liebert PSA 1500Va that only ever reports
OB and
2013 Aug 02
2
Fwd: Liebert PSA UPS problem.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Paul Smith"
> Subject: Liebert PSA UPS problem.
> Date: July 31, 2013 4:42:33 PM EDT
> To: <nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org>
>
> Hi all,
> A brief summary:
>
> I have a new Liebert PSA UPS which I wanted to help support my FreeNAS box (a FreeBSD 8 variant). Unfortunately the nut-ups implementation here for
2014 Oct 18
2
Liebert PSA "On Battery" report
I downloaded latest source and it compiles ok but the original usbhid-ups.c is unchanged. Pier changed other files, too, and I don't know the changes needed. Simply substituting the modified (as per 2011) usbhid-ups gives a failed connection to the ups. So I have tried a little. I'll uninstall 2.6.3 and try to install 2.7.2 from a fresh compile.
Thanks for the responses so far :-)
--
2014 Oct 18
0
Liebert PSA "On Battery" report
I guess it's kind of a natural response on my part, working professionally in software. T-Shooting step one: Get current and see if the problem persists. If it does,then step rwo: debug. 2+ years is forever in software, noting that 2.6.3 was mid 2012 . . .
- Tim
On October 17, 2014 9:38:15 PM CDT, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote:
>On Oct 17, 2014, at 8:31 PM, Tim Dawson
2014 Oct 18
0
Liebert PSA "On Battery" report
This is the last post in the old thread:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/2011-February/006651.html
I'm marginally reluctant to install a non-standard release on a customer
server because I may not be the next person to have to work on it,
however, I do agree the most recent is usually the first port-of-call.
Since it seems the fix didn't get followed through,