similar to: Your message to Nut-commits awaits moderator approval

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, syslinux-bounces at zytor.com wrote: > Your mail to 'SYSLINUX' with the subject > > Re: [syslinux] Syslinux keyboard mappings > > Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. > > The reason it is being held: > > Message has a suspicious header > > Either the message will get posted to the list, or you

What filter rule is violated? So frustrated, why can't I post question! ----- Original Message ---- From: "r-help-bounces at r-project.org" <r-help-bounces at r-project.org> To: yjmha69 at yahoo.com Sent: Fri, June 4, 2010 12:28:37 PM Subject: Your message to R-help awaits moderator approval Your mail to 'R-help' with the subject ? ? subsetting a dataframe Is

Hello there, You sent me the below email a couple of days ago and, as I haven't yet received any moderator notice that my post was rejected ... I assume it actually *has* been posted. I would therefore like to see my post - and see if it has attracted any responses. But I need you to tell me how to see my post on the xiph site (as I cannot find any instructions how to get to it). Thank

Thank you very much for your email, DT. Yes, I did see that msg about taking up too many bytes ? but I never received the promised email from the mods, telling me it had been rejected! So I assumed it had been posted ? and wanted to read the thread. My problem is ? I cannot see how to read Icecast threads. Any advice? Rgds, Andrew From: Icecast <icecast-bounces at

You posted this message to the list, I'm not a mod and I can read it. For March, I do not see any other post made by you. It clearly says WHY your post was rejected: "Message body is too big: 59787 bytes with a limit of 40 KB" I suspect this was an automated action. Re-write your original post so that it isn't too large (likely caused by attachments), and re-send it. On

On Fri, 2023-03-24 at 21:45 +1100, redwood.andrew at gmail.com wrote: > ? > Yes, I did see that msg about taking up too many bytes ? but I never > received the promised email from the mods, telling me it had been > rejected!? So I assumed it had been posted ? and wanted to read the > thread. Sure, you can wait for the moderator's decision. How long, we do not know. Or you can

Thank you, D.T. Now, you wrote below: ?Since you are reading this post, means you are receiving the list messages, so all is good?. Do you mean by this ? that interacting with the Icecast user group is simply by sending & receiving email messages ? ie. to specific people (like your good self)? IE. there is no ?Forum?, as such, where I can view different topics and follow the various

Yes, but we all get to read them as they go to everyone :) It is a bit old fashioned. And it?s probably run on a Linux server that hasn?t even been rebooted for a decade. I myself am waiting for a response to my email, which I?m not sure if it has ever gone out. I had a look for a decent Icecast forum but only found one that wasn?t running anymore. I don?t really understand it - streaming has

On 3/27/23 03:25, rack00terry at icloud.com wrote: > Horses for courses perhaps. But I get way too much email, and > personally find book marking a current web conversation much easier. Not to sound rude, but sounds like a 'you' problem and not an 'Icecast mailing list' problem. > Moreover, I don?t want my email address shared with a massive (presumably) list, so I

> "Web" forums are super old fashion. I mean they even predate IP and E- > Mail... Horses for courses perhaps. But I get way too much email, and personally find book marking a current web conversation much easier. Moreover, I don?t want my email address shared with a massive (presumably) list, so I have to use a ?throw away? address, which is added hassle. Especially when said

Good morning, On Sun, 2023-03-26 at 00:24 +0000, rack00terry at icloud.com wrote: > Yes, but we all get to read them as they go to everyone :) > > It is a bit old fashioned. And it?s probably run on a Linux server > that hasn?t even been rebooted for a decade. The machine isn't nearly as old as that to begin with. ;) > I myself am waiting for a response to my email, which

Hi everyone, I try to add many vectors (L1,L2,L3....) to multiple list objects (a.list, b.list....) in a workspace. Somethings like below, but it is not working. Any suggestions will be appreciated. Best, John lf=ls(pattern=".lst")  for (x in listfiles) {     dat=read.delim(x,header=F)     for (i in lf) {     assign(i$add,as.numeric(dat[,3]))   #or i$add=as.numeric(dat[,3]    

Can someone tell me why I get on of these every once and a while. My emails are small. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: samba-bounces@lists.samba.org <samba-bounces@lists.samba.org> Date: Jun 15, 2005 8:26 AM Subject: Your message to samba awaits moderator approval To: diadicic@gmail.com Your mail to 'samba' with the subject Re: [Samba] Domain logon problem

I have started to read r-help on Gmane using Thunderbird as a reader. Before that I had messages sent to gmail account. The first post through Gmane needed moderator approval, but then I got a message from Your friendly autoauthorizer at Gmane.org saying You are now authorized to post to the gmane.comp.lang.r.general newsgroup. But my messages are still needing moderator approval, which I

Hi, If you are getting tired of being teased about updating your syncmail script to the new CVS loginfo syntax, this mail is for you. If you have opted to use the CIA script, you have already switched to the new loginfo format. If not, you need to do now. For that you need to add UseNewInfoFmtStrings=yes to the CVS config file. Then if you have script using the old format you can escape it

Hello, Usually is it easy to identify a valid non-subscriber-posting. Example given: the four postings about "bugzilla is back" in last day. Today there is a posting from the data plane development kit project, http://dpdk.org/ DPDK is a set of libraries and drivers for fast packet processing. Packets being network packets. That posting is not spam, but it should not go to this

Hallo, Luke, Du meintest am 02.04.16: > Also, when I run testparm -svv | less I can find these four lines on > both the working and non-working servers: > server max protocol = SMB3 > server min protocol = LANMAN1 > client max protocol = NT1 > client min protocol = CORE Perhaps a max protocol = NT1 in the global section helps. And

Is that with an active directory domain controller? On Apr 3, 2016 11:21 PM, "barış tombul" <bbtombul at gmail.com> wrote: > my conf win10 no problem: > client NTLMv2 auth = Yes > client lanman auth = No > server max protocol = SMB3_11 > server min protocol = LANMAN1 > client max protocol = SMB3_11 > client min protocol = CORE > >

Dear All, I am using R to do my work and thank you very much for developing, maintaining and making such excellent software available to anyone that is interested enough to ask for it. I have registered at Nabble. I was wondering the right forum for me to send my help request. I have tried sending to R-help at r-project.org. However, I do receive a kind of warning email stating that my email

On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 07:49:46PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > > It is not important how long I have been moderator for this mailinglist. > > Thing is that I'm thinking about stepping back. > > > } Who would like to help the Syslinux project by moderating this ML? > > I'm willing to help with