similar to: CVS branches?

I apologize for how basic a question this is. I am a Stata user who has begun using R, and the syntax differences still trip me up. The most basic questions, involving as they do general terms, can be the hardest to find solutions for through search. Assume for the moment that I have a dataset that contains seven variables: Pollution, Temp, Industry, Population, Wind, Rain and Wet.days. (This

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:28 AM, Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > FWIW, I am still against releasing 6.04-pre1 yet. Why? A pre-release is not a full release. It means we're getting ready and have something that we want more people to test, especially those who can't reliably build test binaries, especially those who can't build any. Yes there are open

... > nasm -f elf -Ox -g -F dwarf -DDATE_STR="''" \ > -DHEXDATE="0x56dc3c62" \ > -Di386 \ > -I/tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ \ > -l ldlinux.lsr -o ldlinux.o -MP -MD ./.ldlinux.o.d /tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ldlinux.asm > nasm -f elf -Ox -g -F dwarf -DDATE_STR="''" \ > -DHEXDATE="0x56dc3c62" \ > -Di386 \ >

After so much time and improvements, I'm glad to see and publicize a pre-release, 6.04-pre1 in https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/boot/syslinux/Testing/6.04/ Personally, I've already been working testing the pre-release as-is and my tests have been positive so far. I appreciate feedback like that from Gabriele Balducci and testing "make bios installer". Yes, there are a

On 06.03.2016 18:23, poma wrote: > On 06.03.2016 16:47, poma wrote: >> ... >>> nasm -f elf -Ox -g -F dwarf -DDATE_STR="''" \ >>> -DHEXDATE="0x56dc3c62" \ >>> -Di386 \ >>> -I/tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ \ >>> -l ldlinux.lsr -o ldlinux.o -MP -MD ./.ldlinux.o.d /tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ldlinux.asm >>>

> Thank you all. > > It looks like -mno-red-zone flag is already in master branch since > commit 7d70885d, but it seems it is applied to all EFI builds. Finally we are on the same page. > > IIUC, the problem only affects efi64 builds. Have you actually tested efi32 (ia32) builds? > > So here's the modification of my patch to only apply -mno-red-zone >

On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 9:29 PM Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > > > > _ target/EFI/BOOT/SYSLINUX.CFG > > > > I don't think that exists? (see list below) > > > In our "first test" (simple boot prompt), we created > "target/EFI/BOOT/SYSLINUX.CFG". In our "second test" we _added_ >

> >> Let me double check what the status of 6.04-pre1 is. Maybe this patch > >> is not necessary at all! > > OK, I have verified beyond doubt that 6.04-pre1 (prebuilt from > kernel.org) indeed does fix the issue on the affected systems. > > Again, sorry for the churn! > > Best Regards, > - Chris OK, so, from the user's point of view, the

> Let me double check what the status of 6.04-pre1 is. Maybe this patch > is not necessary at all! Just a reminder: _ 6.04-pre1 can be downloaded from kernel.org, and it includes pre-built binaries, so no "make" anything is needed (and to some degree, not always recommended). _ In many cases, testing with pre-built official binaries is desired, so others can attempt to

On 07/14/16 05:56, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > @Peter, Erwan, Gene, Michal, (and anyone else interested)... > > Although I haven't actually tested Erwan's patch, would it be > acceptable by you (all) if I were to send a patch to this Syslinux > Mailing List with the same code while changing the wording as I > previously suggested in a prior email? Would it be

Hi to all, I am having a problem when using recode from the car package. I have a variable that is char and when I use recode to create a new variable that is supposed to be numeric I get a factor variable. Here is the code I am using: > FCI$PRE1 <- recode (PRE1RES, " c('C', 'c')=1 ; else = 0 ; as.factor.result=FALSE ") So, if I understand correctly the recode

Network UPS Tools version 2.2.2-pre1 has been released. http://www.networkupstools.org/ Direct access: - Download: http://www.networkupstools.org/source/2.2/testing/nut-2.2.2-pre1.tar.gz - News: http://www.networkupstools.org/source/2.2/testing/new-2.2.2-pre1.txt - ChangeLog: http://www.networkupstools.org/source/2.2/testing/ChangeLog Arnaud and the NUT team -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D -

On 6/6/19 8:16 AM, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > >> the PXELINUX log line is >> printed (PXELINUX 6.04 lwIP 6.04-pre3 Copyright (C) 1994-2015 H. Peter >> Anvin et al), > > (snip) > > FWIW, the official binaries from 6.04-pre2 and 6.04-pre3 are not good > for troubleshooting. > > Is the same behavior present when testing with other versions? I would

On Sat, 13 Jul, at 07:58:21PM, Michael Szerencsits wrote: > I use VMWare Player 5.02 build 1031769 on Win2k8 R2 64bit. > I found that the last working version is 6.02-pre1 but beginning > with pre2 and also latest version 6.02-pre5 it fail to boot. Are you sure that 6.02-pre1 worked? There was only one commit between 6.02-pre1 and 6.02-pre2 and it shouldn't have affected anything at

I recommend someone verify that tar.gz and tar.xz files ( at https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/boot/syslinux/ ) unpack without errors. (I assume use of compression is in hope of saving download bandwidth) Regards

On 11/25/2013 04:12 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > > I made some more and more experiments beyond LBA 65535 > > Works: * isolinux-4.07.bin (size 24574) * isolinux-5.00.bin (size > 34816) > > Does not work: * isolinux-5.01.bin (size 34816) * isolinux-5.10.bin > (size 36864) * isolinux-6.00.bin (size 38912) * isolinux-6.02.bin > (size 43008) > > * I just

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 When I tried to use the menu.c32 from SYSLINUX 3.30-pre1, the simple menu have different background color than that in 3.20. 1. use the menu.c32 from SYSLINUX 3.30-pre1, the simple menu is: http://lfod.nchc.org.tw/stick/syslinux/syslinux_menu_3.30_pre1.jpg 2. use the menu.c32 from SYSLINUX 3.20, the simple menu is:

On 07/05/2013 01:02 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > > 5.00 [pxelinux.0] OK 5.01 [pxelinux.0] OK 5.02-pre1 > [pxelinux.0] OK 5.02-pre2 [pxelinux.0] OK 5.02-pre3 [pxelinux.0] > BAD (freeze, no error messages, 100% CPU used) > > 5.10-pre1 [pxelinux.0] BAD (freeze, no error messages, 100% CPU > used) 5.10-pre2 [pxelinux.0] BAD (Failed to load: ldlinux.c32,

Thanks for the hints - I have NOT CONFIG_EFI enabled - do I need this actually? I do not know which variables I need to boot... The kernel APPEND parameters are sufficient for me... And the relocatable config is set already. .. I enabled the EFI kernel config parts - no change... the console prints: Booting System... Loading linux... ok Loading iramfs.gz...ok [then reboot] My syslinux.cfg is

Op 2013-07-12 om 14:06 schreef syslinux-owner at zytor.com: > Reason: Message body is too big: 1780404 bytes with a limit of 512 KB So previous not on the mailinglist. > Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 23:05:05 +0200 (CEST) > From: Michael Szerencsits <szerencsits.michael at gmx.at> > To: syslinux at zytor.com > Subject: efi64 boot fail during download from kernel and initrd