similar to: What''s the new syntax for predicates?

Hi all, I have an array of shipping_type''s being returned, and I want to see what is in there. In the past I have done: shipping_type.include?(Cart::SHIPPING_TYPE_REGULAR).should be_true This works, but looks really ugly.. It just doesn''t roll of the tongue very well. I then looked up the use of Predicates, which I had been using, but hadn''t realized:

On Dec 27, 2007 3:18 PM, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) <shot at hot.pl> wrote: > Shot (Piotr Szotkowski): > > > I happily hand-compiled Ruby 1.9.0-0 into /home/shot/opt/ruby today > > and I''m running into a strange error with RSpec ? all my examples work > > perfectly with Ruby 1.8 but are considered peding on Ruby 1.9. > > FWIW, I get the same result with

David Vandevoorde a écrit : > > I don't think those are _good_ reasons though: If one doesn't want a C+ > + function to be inlined, one shouldn't define it inline. > > You must not have written a lot of C++ template then. You don't have the choice in this case, just check your STL header. > > FWIW, I've been involved in a couple of attempts by

Hello, On (03/30/16 16:12), Minchan Kim wrote: [..] > +static void objidx_to_page_and_offset(struct size_class *class, > + struct page *first_page, > + unsigned long obj_idx, > + struct page **obj_page, > + unsigned long *offset_in_page) > { > - unsigned long obj; > + int i; > + unsigned long offset; > + struct page *cursor; > + int nr_page; >

Hello, On (03/30/16 16:12), Minchan Kim wrote: [..] > +static void objidx_to_page_and_offset(struct size_class *class, > + struct page *first_page, > + unsigned long obj_idx, > + struct page **obj_page, > + unsigned long *offset_in_page) > { > - unsigned long obj; > + int i; > + unsigned long offset; > + struct page *cursor; > + int nr_page; >

On Aug 27, 2009, at 3:07 AM, Cédric Venet wrote: > David Vandevoorde a écrit : >> >> I don't think those are _good_ reasons though: If one doesn't want >> a C+ + function to be inlined, one shouldn't define it inline. >> >> > > You must not have written a lot of C++ template then. (Ha!) > You don't have the choice in this case, just

Hi all I have been pondering this for a while, but not yet seen a clean way to do it I have a few puppet classes (apache/ntp/mysql/bacula/nagios/etc) I would like to generate part of my bacula and nagios configs for each host based on which other classes that host belongs to (or to put it another way, I would like to export variables from classes which would be used by my bacula and nagios

Dear everyone, I posted a similar question to Stack Overflow there: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46907554/binding-with-libiconv-failed-while-compiling-r-devel-on-ubuntu-17-04 and I was suggested to post my question here. I tried to compile R devel using Dirk Eddelbuettel's recipe (and many variants of it). Regardless of what I do, I have: === [...]/src/main/sysutils.c:794:

David Vandevoorde a écrit : > On Aug 27, 2009, at 3:07 AM, Cédric Venet wrote: > > >> David Vandevoorde a écrit : >> >>> I don't think those are _good_ reasons though: If one doesn't want >>> a C+ + function to be inlined, one shouldn't define it inline. >>> >>> >>> >> You must not have written a

Hi all What is the best strategy to add another storage to an existing virtual mail system ? Move some domains to the new storage and create symlinks ? Switch to dovecot hashing ? But in this case what is the easy-east way to migrate ? Thanks for any suggestions or tips !

Hey all, If any of you are using the new predicate_matchers feature, I just committed a change to it in trunk. See http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=10542&group_id=797&atid=3152 for more details, but the high level is that instead of this: predicate_matchers[:method_on_object] = :method_in_spec It now (as of rev 1898 - soon to be released in 0.9.2) does this:

>>> > > Aside from potentially needing smaller buffers for config files before > parsing (which seems trivial and unnecessary), what other benefits are > there to this strategy? > At the core, is that Syslinux is a general bootloader which gives access to a virtual filesystem.? It supports multiple open files, but not seeking or writing. <<< Please correct me if

Chris Lattner wrote: >>I don't grok this error message. Of course, -opt-a and -opt-b both work >>fine in isolation. >> >> > >You're right, this error message is terrible. As it turns out, all of >your passes invalidate all of the other passes, so C doesn't get A (which >is invalidated by B). The problem turns out to be a really trivial bug:

We''d like to get some feedback on RSpec 0.9 before we start pushing out releases via Rubyforge''s gem server and update the website. We have therefore made the first beta of 0.9 available - both prepackaged and tagged in subversion (see below). RSpec 0.9 introduces a new API for expectations, which essentially means that your underscores go away (there has been other discussions

Thanks for posting here. On 24 October 2017 at 14:14, Matthias Zytnicki wrote: | Dear everyone, | | I posted a similar question to Stack Overflow there: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46907554/binding-with-libiconv-failed-while-compiling-r-devel-on-ubuntu-17-04 and I was suggested to post my question here. | | I tried to compile R devel using Dirk Eddelbuettel's recipe (and many

I came into this with my eyes wide open. I have read ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING there is to be found on the net about avoiding echo problems BEFORE I even attempted to create a production system. Since lots of people are apparently using this in production environments now I just assumed that echo IS avoidable. As others have recommended, I created a test system with the proposed production

All, If you look at http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=6760&group_id=797&atid=3149 you''ll see that Chad (the submitter) found the source of the bug. Unfortunately, the source of *this* bug is the *solution* to a *previous bug* in which Rails was replacing RSpec''s method missing with its own. When we settled on underscores, my one reservation was

As things stand now, the following will all pass: true.should_be true "true".should_be true "false".should_be true 3.should_be true etc My feeling is that "should_be true" should only pass if it returns boolean true even though ruby says that non-nil/non-false is true. Anybody else? David

I sent this earlier under with the subject "artificial sugar causes cancer" and I think some spam filters ate it. Here it is again: ====================================== All, If you look at http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=6760&group_id=797&atid=3149 you''ll see that Chad (the submitter) found the source of the bug. Unfortunately, the source

I''m working with a has_many :through association, where a Member has_many Projects through ProjectViewers. The problem I''m running into is that Rails doesn''t load the association so line (3) fails until I explicitly access a member of the collection (in this case, I iterated it). Is there a better way? Thanks, Steve 1. assigns[:member].should_not_be_nil 2.