similar to: Testing UPS

I have read the shutdown.txt in the docs directory. It says that after upsmon calls the shutdown command init takes over. This I understand clearly. However, step 8. 8. init then runs your shutdown script. This checks for the POWERDOWNFLAG, finds it, and tells the UPS driver(s) to power off the load. Since init is shuting down the system, why is the POWERDOWNFLAG needed? Why do I

> On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:26:09 -0600 > durwin at mgtsciences.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Centos is RHEL recompiled and as such, it will suffer from the same > > > problems as Fedora (some people call Fedora, RHEL testing) from the > > > Samba point of view. Basically, if you are going to change distro, > > > you need to find

Ever since installing Fedora 7, samba stopped showing the machine on the network. I can connect to it by entering the machine name (\\lazarus), but it will not show itself from a Windows machine. I tried a command suggested to test if it was listening and this is what I got; $ smbclient -L localhost -U% Domain=[LAZARUS] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.25b-2.fc7] Sharename Type

I have hollowed these instructions. https://github.com/thctlo/samba4/blob/master/full-howto-Ubuntu18.04-samba-AD_DC.txt My normal domain is company.com. For the Samba domain it is msi.company.com. DNS is working. I ran these commands. host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.msi.company.com. _ldap._tcp.msi.company.com has SRV record 0 100 389 dc0.msi.company.com. host -t SRV _kerberos._udp.msi.company.com.

>> From: schulz at adi.com (Thomas Schulz) >> To: durwin at mgtsciences.com, h.reindl at thelounge.net, > samba at lists.samba.org >> Date: 02/25/2015 06:39 PM >> Subject: Re: [Samba] Workgroup name too long >> Sent by: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org >> >>>> From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> >>>> To: samba at

> > > > > > There are two opensource kerberos servers, one is MIT, which is the > > > default on red-hat distros, the other is Heimdal, which is the > > > default for Samba. After a lot of work, Fedora is now using MIT > > > with Samba, but there is still a lot more to do, so it is > > > recommended to only use the Fedora packages for testing

> From: Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Date: 04/19/2019 08:29 AM > Subject: Re: [Samba] GPO Filtering Denied > Sent by: "samba" <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> > > On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:00:32 -0600 > Durwin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I followed Part 1, Part

> From: Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Date: 05/14/2019 02:50 PM > Subject: Re: [Samba] Workstations cannot update DNS > Sent by: "samba" <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> > > On 14/05/2019 21:36, Durwin via samba wrote: > > I am trying to get DDNS working, so workstations can update their ip.

Two attachments are not being sent. Pasting contents. DC0 smb.conf # Global parameters [global] netbios name = DC0 realm = MSI.MYDOMAIN.COM server role = active directory domain controller server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate workgroup = MSI # This line was added 190710 (DFD)

>> From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> >> To: samba at lists.samba.org >> Date: 02/25/2015 02:52 PM >> Subject: Re: [Samba] Workgroup name too long >> Sent by: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org >> >> >> >> Am 25.02.2015 um 22:48 schrieb Miguel Medalha: >>>> I have searched for this and the solutions I found were

> > > > > > Is this dns server also authoritative for the same dns domain as > > > the AD domain ? > > > > Yes, the Fedora29 server is authoritative. > > > > > > > > > > > Lets start with the smb.conf from the DC, your DC's FQDN and > > > ipaddress (sanitised if you have to) and the same for your Fedora

Your setup is in consistant. > 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost > 127.0.0.1 localhost I suggest run my debugscript, make sure the servers there base setup is the same. + set both DC's there /etc/resolv.conf search msi.mydomain.com mydomain.com # IF THIS IS DC1 nameserver 172.23.93.26 nameserver 172.23.93.25 nameserver 172.23.93.3 # and for DC0

Hai,   That -k  should use the kerberos auth. we should think about a bit better description here.   When your root/Administrator then it works ok also. Wel, you found the problem and you where able to fix it, so im happy.   and good to see that you did not have any errors running: samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset   Thanks for the notice back.   Greetz,   Louis       Van: durwin at

Am 25.02.2015 um 22:48 schrieb Miguel Medalha: >> I have searched for this and the solutions I found were for instances >> where the workgroup name *was* too long. However, my workgroup name is >> *not* too long. The spaces between PEGASUS and ^[ are part of the >> message, I did not add them. If you count them there are 16 total >> including ending ^[. I

On 02/03/2020 18:59, Durwin via samba wrote: >> Can you run this script on both DC's. OK, dc0 seems to have the ipaddress: 172.23.93.25 ?????? dc1 seems to have the ipaddress: 172.23.93.26 So why does dc1 use 172.23.93.3 as its nameserver ? and what is 172.23.93.3 ? The /etc/krb5.conf files should be the same on both machines, I prefer this format: [libdefaults] ???????

> > There are two opensource kerberos servers, one is MIT, which is the > default on red-hat distros, the other is Heimdal, which is the default > for Samba. After a lot of work, Fedora is now using MIT with Samba, but > there is still a lot more to do, so it is recommended to only use the > Fedora packages for testing and Samba with MIT is marked as > experimental. >

On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:55:43 -0600 durwin at mgtsciences.com wrote: > > From: Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > > To: samba at lists.samba.org > > Date: 04/19/2019 08:29 AM > > Subject: Re: [Samba] GPO Filtering Denied > > Sent by: "samba" <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> > > > > On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:00:32

I have 2 Ububtu DCs. One acting as a secondary/failover. At one point the users were replicated from primary to secondary. But now they are not replicating. The output from samba-tool drs showrepl is attached. What else may I provide to aid diagnostics? I know Samba does not replicate sysvol 'yet', so rsync is needed, but that does not seem to contain the users. Thank you,

> > > > > Why are you using the internal dns server on one DC and Bind9 on the > > other ? > > I am very familiar with configuring Named on Fedora. I thought it > > would be > > just as easy on Ubuntu. After discovering the files were in different > > places > > and so many more being 'included', I decided to use internal on the

I am trying to get DDNS working, so workstations can update their ip. The domain is msi.mycompany.com The DC server works, as well as group policies. I set rights to these files > chgrp bind /var/lib/samba/private/ > chmod 750 /var/lib/samba/private/ > chgrp bind /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab > chmod 640 /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab journalctl shows this. May 14 14:22:32