similar to: Megatec driver floods logs #2 & mail notifications

Network UPS Tools version 2.4.3 has been released. http://www.networkupstools.org/ Note: this is only a bugfix release that only solves the regression on IPv6 activation. Direct access: - Download: http://www.networkupstools.org/source/2.4/nut-2.4.3.tar.gz - News: http://www.networkupstools.org/source/2.4/new-2.4.3.txt - ChangeLog: http://www.networkupstools.org/source/2.4/ChangeLog the NUT

Hi Sylvestre, On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > I am working on it as we speak. Hopefully, most of the 3.8 & 3.9 > packages are going to be green by next week. Any updates on that? It appears that Precise repositories are now in order, but all the others (and, most importantly, Trusty) are still not updated. Also, 3.9 packages are not mentioned on the web page,

Hi, I'd like to ask what's the status of the Debian / Ubuntu repositories linked from llvm.org, specifically http://llvm.org/apt/ ... If the timestamps are correct, some of the repositories haven't been updated for months. I've tried browsing them directly, and e.g. for Ubuntu 14.04 (Trusty), the newly released LLVM 3.8 is nowhere to be found, even though it's advertised

I am trying to install R-2.3.0 on a 64bit linux box and encounter several error during the make step. I'd appreciate any help. Error messages follow: [root at calculon R-2.3.0]# make make[4]: Entering directory `/state/partition1/apps/packages/R-2.3.0/src/modules/lapack' gcc -shared -L/usr/local/lib64 -o libRlapack.so dlamc.o dlapack0.o dlapack1.o dlapack2.o dlapack3.o cmplx.o

On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > This is still maintained. However the cmake transition (for both 3.8 and > 3.9) wasn't simple... While it should be fine for debian, it might need > more work for old Ubuntu (back port of cmake) Hi Sylvestre, Thank you for the clarification! Any ETAs on when the APT repositories are going to be updated with LLVM 3.8 & 3.9 builds?

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Sylvestre Ledru via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Le 09/03/2016 à 21:44, Yury V. Zaytsev a écrit : > > On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > >> This is still maintained. However the cmake transition (for both 3.8 > >> and 3.9) wasn't simple... While it should be fine for debian, it >

Le 12/03/2016 à 14:15, Johan Engelen a écrit : > > > > I'm not sure how clean / dirty of a solution you'd be okay with, but > > I'd just point out that CMake developers provide working binary > > tarballs for Linux with every release at > https://cmake.org/download/ . > > So, if you are not a purist and/or need the CMake backport for

Hi guys! I'm trying to get NUT into RPMForge and confusingly enough, it turns out that the code downloads are not available from the official website: http://new.networkupstools.org/download.html [buildbot at servinet SOURCES]$ wget http://www.networkupstools.org/source/2.4/nut-2.4.1.tar.gz --2009-12-25 13:26:23-- http://www.networkupstools.org/source/2.4/nut-2.4.1.tar.gz Resolving

Renato Golin wrote: [...] > Try setting armv7a-unknown-linux-gnueabihf and see if it works better. No, that doesn't work either. [...] > JIT was never the forte of ARM and I haven't tried yet, but I doubt > it'll be any Debian misconfiguration. The whole architecture > configuration is a bit odd... Debian's clang packages are totally broken on armhf --- the compiler

I have a simple expression-evaluation language using LLVM (it's at https://cowlark.com/calculon, if anyone's interested). It has pretty primitive support for 3-vectors, which I'm representing as a <3 x float>. One of my users has asked for proper n-vector support, and I agree with him so I'm adding that. However, he wants to use quite large vectors. He's mentioned 30

On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 08:10 Amaury SECHET via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I'd like to shime in here. These apt repository used to contain packages > named llvm-3.8-tools containing, amongst other things, the lit python > library used to test llvm. It seems that it went away recently and I have > travis build failing because of this. > > What is

Le 29/03/2016 à 14:17, Yury V. Zaytsev a écrit : > Hi Sylvestre, > ri > On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > >> I am working on it as we speak. Hopefully, most of the 3.8 & 3.9 packages are going to be green by next week. > > Any updates on that? Yes, most of the remaining issues are fixed (the sync to llvm.org/apt was disabled). I will send a summary soon.

On 8 February 2013 14:28, David Given <dg at cowlark.com> wrote: > Debian's clang packages are totally broken on armhf --- the compiler > emits a confused warning about the platform being unrecognised, and then > generates softfloat code --- so I was wondering about LLVM itself. I'm using Ubuntu on Pandas and Chromebooks and LLVM itself behaves well, with the right set of

llvm-3.8-dev is broken: CMake Error at /usr/share/llvm-3.8/cmake/LLVMConfig.cmake:178 (include): include could not find load file: /usr/share/llvm/cmake/LLVMExports.cmake llvm-3.7-dev is ok. Why is it so error prone for so many years? On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 11:31 PM Amaury SECHET via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > So, it turns out that the secret sauce to

On 08/02/13 14:42, Renato Golin wrote: [...] > Can you paste the result of a "clang -v -mcpu=CPU file.c" on your box? I > want to see what are the arguments and the assembler/linker it's > choosing to use. What CPU are we talking about? The box itself is an Allwinner A10; armv7l. /proc/cpuinfo says it's got swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp neon vfpv3. I've been

Hi. If anyone is interested, here is a working prototype: http://git.etherboot.org/?p=people/xl0/syslinux-lua.git;a=summary Os, io and math libraries are not compiled right now. Also, there are no bindings for any syslinux functions. Otherwise, everything should work just fine, like ISOLINUX 3.71 pre14-14-g8b9b72a* Copyright (C) 1994-2008 H. Peter Anvin Could not find kernel image: linux

Yesterday morning I awoke to alerts from my SAN that one of my OS disks was faulty, FMA said it was in hardware failure. By the time I got to work (1.5 hours after the email) ALL of my pools were in a degraded state, and "tank" my primary pool had kicked in two hot spares because it was so discombobulated. ------------------- EMAIL ------------------- List of faulty resources:

Hi! I have finally set up NUT more or less the way I want it to work, but after live testing, it turned out that the UPS (Ablerex VS000361, serially connected using megatec driver) does not switch on the load after the shutdown has been initiated & completed and power came back on. Is there any magic command that I'm missing that I have to issue to instruct the unit to switch the load

On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 09:38 Amaury SECHET <deadalnix at gmail.com> wrote: > I'd be happy to do it, but this is a bit much high level for me to be > actionable. Can you explain me what I should do to reintroduce them int he > debian packaging ? > On the CMake side, I'm not sure. I think it's just a matter of using the "install()" functions to install them

On 8 February 2013 11:01, David Given <dg at cowlark.com> wrote: > I've tried overriding the triple to arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf and > arm-linux-gnueabihf (via module->setTargetTriple), and while the triples > are accepted, the actual generated code doesn't change with either. > Hi David, If you set the triple to arm it won't help, since it'll default to