similar to: early shutdown of VMware VMs

Greetings. We are running * on RH9 using a Digium TDM400P four-port FXO card. We use only two ports on the card (ports 0 and 2 in this case). A consultant set this up for us, and it mostly works OK. However, outbound calls use our secondary number rather than our primary number first. This undesirable because of Caller ID; we'd like the primary number to appear instead. Yes, I can

Future AMD SVM supports a new feature called flush by ASID. The idea is to allow CPU to flush TLBs associated with the ASID assigned to guest VM. So hypervisor doesn''t have to reassign a new ASID in order to flush guest''s VCPU. Please review it. Thanks, Wei Signed-off-by: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.wang2@amd.com> -- Advanced Micro

Attached patch for svm will enable a tlb flush for each vmrun. Applies cleanly to 8781:dcc2beb8a1d2 Signed-off-by: Tom Woller <thomas.woller@amd.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

On Tue, 12 May 2015 15:34:47 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:14:53PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Wed, 06 May 2015 14:07:37 +0200 > > Greg Kurz <gkurz at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > Unlike with add and clear, there is no valid reason to abort when checking > > > for a

On Tue, 12 May 2015 15:34:47 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:14:53PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Wed, 06 May 2015 14:07:37 +0200 > > Greg Kurz <gkurz at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > Unlike with add and clear, there is no valid reason to abort when checking > > > for a

I didn't go there due to its use by Cisco. On Fri, Mar 12, 2021, 10:03 PM Baker, Lawrence M via Nut-upsuser < nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote: > Jim, > > The terminology I recall for that one-to-many relationship is > publisher-subscriber. > > Larry Baker > US Geological Survey > 650-329-5608 > baker at usgs.gov > > > > On Mar 12

I didn't go there due to its use by Cisco. On Fri, Mar 12, 2021, 10:03 PM Baker, Lawrence M via Nut-upsuser < nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote: > Jim, > > The terminology I recall for that one-to-many relationship is > publisher-subscriber. > > Larry Baker > US Geological Survey > 650-329-5608 > baker at usgs.gov > > > > On Mar 12

Hi all, Please can anybody explain how communication(direct or indirect) happens between xen and guest os(windows) in full virtualization mode. Both from VMM to guest and from guest to VMM. Thanks and regards, Aditya. __________________________________________________________ Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new http://in.answers.yahoo.com/

I want to try to use NUT on Linux server, but most of the servers I need to shutdown are Windows. Before I try to install I wanted to ask you how stable is the Windows Beta of NUT ? I need only the client part of the Windows port, only to shut down the Windows servers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 3/12/21 9:14 PM, Rusty Bower wrote: > Manager/subscriber seems most accurate > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 12, 2021, at 20:13, Douglas Parsons <doug at parsonsemail.com> wrote: >> >> ? >> In place of secondary how about subscriber? It would be accurate to >> the role. I'd been going to suggest controller and ... something.

On 3/12/21 9:14 PM, Rusty Bower wrote: > Manager/subscriber seems most accurate > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 12, 2021, at 20:13, Douglas Parsons <doug at parsonsemail.com> wrote: >> >> ? >> In place of secondary how about subscriber? It would be accurate to >> the role. I'd been going to suggest controller and ... something.

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:17:09PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com> > > Implement a handler for #VC exceptions caused by MONITOR and MONITORX > instructions. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com> > [ jroedel at suse.de: Adapt to #VC handling infrastructure ] > Co-developed-by: Joerg Roedel

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:17:09PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com> > > Implement a handler for #VC exceptions caused by MONITOR and MONITORX > instructions. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com> > [ jroedel at suse.de: Adapt to #VC handling infrastructure ] > Co-developed-by: Joerg Roedel

There is, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publish%E2%80%93subscribe_pattern I said I stayed away from it because of the Cisco link. Others as well as you are free to persue it. I was just making suggestions. On Fri, Mar 12, 2021, 10:43 PM Baker, Lawrence M <baker at usgs.gov> wrote: > That is terminology from Computer Science. (Decades ago?) It is > familiar. Not invented by

There is, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publish%E2%80%93subscribe_pattern I said I stayed away from it because of the Cisco link. Others as well as you are free to persue it. I was just making suggestions. On Fri, Mar 12, 2021, 10:43 PM Baker, Lawrence M <baker at usgs.gov> wrote: > That is terminology from Computer Science. (Decades ago?) It is > familiar. Not invented by

Thank you for the suggestions, keep them coming :) To me, I think I considered pub-sub but it did not quite fit - gotta refresh my memory by code re-reading (or expert comments) - I found I'm vague now on who hits the big red button to shout that a particular power source device got critical - the upsmon in "master" role, or "upsd" that talks to all subscribed (indeed!)

Thank you for the suggestions, keep them coming :) To me, I think I considered pub-sub but it did not quite fit - gotta refresh my memory by code re-reading (or expert comments) - I found I'm vague now on who hits the big red button to shout that a particular power source device got critical - the upsmon in "master" role, or "upsd" that talks to all subscribed (indeed!)

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 03:10:45PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:38:45PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:17:09PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > +static enum es_result vc_handle_monitor(struct ghcb *ghcb, > > > + struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt) > > > +{ > > > + phys_addr_t monitor_pa; > >

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 03:10:45PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:38:45PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:17:09PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > +static enum es_result vc_handle_monitor(struct ghcb *ghcb, > > > + struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt) > > > +{ > > > + phys_addr_t monitor_pa; > >

That is terminology from Computer Science. (Decades ago?) It is familiar. Not invented by Cisco. As in, producer-consumer, from the same time. Those were all different paradigms for client-server relationships. There must be Wikipedia citations that can be consulted. As I recall, there were distinctions, such as, producer-consumer were tightly bound, where the producer had no purpose