similar to: HP/Compaq T700H UPS cable pinout

Hi Has anyone got a Compaq(/HP) T700 UPS to work with the BCMXCP driver? I've built yesterday's CVS of NUT 2.1 on one of my FreeBSD systems but chown root:wheel /dev/cuaa0 /usr/local/libexec/upsdrvctl -u root start gives: -- Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.1.0 Network UPS Tools - BCMXCP UPS driver 0.10 (2.1.0) Communications with UPS lost: Error executing command

Hi there! I just recently got a nice new UPS to power most of my computer equipment, and having it working perfectly under NUT. However, I had a perfectly good Powercom Black Night 600AP UPS, which I'm now trying to get to power my internet gateway. Unfortuantly, due to not thinking on my part, I threw away the original serial cable. I have tried a straight - through cable, and the one

I am trying to test the T1 card in our legacy PBX but the connector to the card is a 15 pin serial cable. I would like to make it myself so I can try this test today. Does anyone have a pinout for it? I just made a T1 RJ-45 loop back to test my TE110P and it tested out fine. I'm trying to resolve some timing issues and a tech from Digium is going to ssh in and walk around my asterisk server

Hi, I have an HPML150 using fedora4 and am attempting to use nut tools with it's HP T700 UPS - Following this howto : http://fedoranews.org/contributors/kazutoshi_morioka/nut/ Attached are relevant configs. I've tried a whole bunch of ups drivers; apcsmart, fentonups, bestups, genericups type 1--> 16 Yet to try the remaining drivers Some genericups upstypes trigger immediate

Hi, Digium's E400P has RJ45 conector and my E1 link has BNC concetor. Could someone tell me the cable pinouts to make this conection? thanks Eduardo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Has anyone gotten it working at all with Linux :) I picked one up for thiry bucks and would love to monitor it! Liz - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFD/5fEIACpLcG4dhwRAmeCAJ9+8FGXqKoOlZdkw/KFXb9n0PEemwCdHaoD NVnv7JjmBAjNsExK6WzAdnA= =pcPX - -----END PGP

Hi, I have a Comapq T2400H model 242688-003 and do not have the special cable to connect it to my serial port. I have tried all sorts of cable wirings that I found on the net, including ones for the powerware 5119 which appears to be the same model. I have read the documentation that comes with NUT, tried to read the source code and looked at the genericups code too.? I have

Say I had a crossover cable that connected a Mitel SX200 to a TE110P and the pinout was done as such: 1 - 4 2 - 5 5 - 1 4 - 2 (the 5 and 4 are transposed on the left side) Instead of the proper way of: 1 - 4 2 - 5 4 - 1 5 - 2 What would the results be? We have had the former as our cabling for a few months and the connection has been fine. Slip errors here and there. But we have had major

My telco used cat5 as well for the demarc to CPE. It's also with noting that many channel banks, such as my Atlas, and zapata.conf itself also have parameters to allow you to tune the gains to compensate for cable signal loss. I've never had to touch them, and my CPE is about 300 feet from the PRI demarc (with an ordinary Cat5 cable connecting them)

At Sangoma we do quite a lot of back-to back T1 and E1 connections. T1 is not a very fussy connection, as the baud rate is only about 750 kbps. In our experience, for error free communications you can use the following rules of thumb: Up to 50 ft: Flat patch cable Up to 500 ft: Ordinary twisted telephone cable Cat 5 may be overkill unless you are going hundreds of feet. David Yat Sin

I was once told by a lineman that the cables they use didn't have that many twists in them because it wasn't needed, and that the extra twists would effectively use more cable and thus cost and weigh more than triple what they do now. He told me that with the number of twists in the Cat 5 cable it would cancel out any interference, but he also stated that the effective length was

>> >>Good thing he doesn't work for a cable manufacturer as that's >>a total crock of crap that even an inexperienced person >>should be able to detect. (You can't twist two wires to make >>them weight three times as much, or cost three times as much.) He may have started out as an underground lineman, posibly inhaling too much swamp gas and CO from

I tend to use the soft sell. Looks like I Just self-promoted :-) -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of John Novack Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 12:05 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: Pinouts for T1/E1 crossover cable WAS "RE: [Asterisk-Users]

I have used cross-connect wire from the spool to make T1 crossover cables with RJ45 ends. All that matters is that pin one goes to four and two goes to five on both ends. ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com on behalf of Andrew Sent: Sat 4/22/2006 2:51 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: Pinouts for T1/E1

> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 12:14 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: Pinouts for T1/E1 crossover cable WAS "RE: [Asterisk-Users] > whatcable to connect a legacy PBX to

The "telco guys" probably did something non-industry standard and reversed send and receive in the jack that they plugged the CAT5 into. Sure it works, sure it is easier, sure it is not the correct way of doing things. Thanks, Steve ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com on behalf of Lacy Moore - Aspendora Sent: Sat 4/22/2006 2:55 PM To: Paul

I agree. I haven't had a problem using CAT-5, even for long runs, however it's not a real T-Carrier cable and I didn't know how old the PBX is. Paul >I have not in my experience seen any problems with using a Good Quality >Cat5 vs. Cat 3 (telco standard) cable for X-connects. YMMV, but you >should be fine. As far as the shielding goes, I use UTP cables and >Connectors

I for one think it is a great idea to buy a book with hard earned money and wait a few days to a week just to get an answer to a question that is freely available on the internet immediately. Hard pressed to think of anything in the "book" that is not on with wiki with more up to date and useful information. -----Original Message----- From: Alexander Lopez

Can't anyone stop self-promotion and tell the poor guy what he needs. A T1/E1 X-over cable using an RJ-45 (8-cond.) is pinned out as follows: 1 - 4 2 - 5 3 - NU 4 - 1 5 - 2 6 - NU 7 - NU 8 - NU NU = Not Used I have not in my experience seen any problems with using a Good Quality Cat5 vs. Cat 3 (telco standard) cable for X-connects. YMMV, but you should be fine. As far as the shielding

Hi, I have a Cisco 7960G phone for which I know the pinout of the headset socket. I have a couple of standard telephone headsets which I do not know the pinout of. I'd like to connect the two. If I have the pinout of a normal/standard headset I can rewire the ones I have to match the cisco. Thanks Mike