similar to: megatec driver floods syslog with "UPS lost/re-established" messages

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "megatec driver floods syslog with "UPS lost/re-established" messages"

2009 Dec 28
4
Megatec driver floods logs #2 & mail notifications
Hi there! I'm a n00b NUT user trying to get it running on RHEL5 and actually do something useful for me. Few questions: 1) I want it to notify me by email on power loss and power back events. I can't find any sample scripts for this purpose... Where shall I look for them? 2) So far, I've backported the package from Fedora and got my Ablerex running (previously used with Upsilon /
2006 Aug 04
1
RE nut drivers
Hi Alexander, > I've UPS named PowerMan RealSmart 1000, it is not listed in > compatibility list. I found that it works with "fentonups" driver and > have ups.model "Unknown S163-1000". Ithink "1000" is from capacity - > I've seen in Internet someone have RealSmart 800 identified "S163-800". > Also PowerMan have
2008 Sep 30
5
Corrupted transaction log file / record size too small
I recently upgradeded dovecot on one of our servers from version 1.0.10 to version 1.1.3. Ever since, we've been seeing occasional errors similar to this sequence (with the username and IP addresses elided): Sep 30 00:09:56 alcor dovecot: pop3-login: Login: [4954], XXXX, NNN.NNN.NN.NNN Sep 30 00:09:56 alcor dovecot: wrapper[5006]: pop3, XXXX, NNN.NNN.NN.NNN Sep 30 00:09:56 alcor
2006 Aug 16
1
default_realm problem
Hello List, I've upgraded to dovecot from FreeBSD ports, changed the config from previous 0.99 version, but meet a problem with %d variable beeing empty in userdb static configuration directive. Our server supports multiple domains, e.g. 'mxc.ru' and 'mail.mxc.ru'. Users can log into using their full e-mail address like antonm at mxc.ru or antonm at mail.mxc.ru, but the
2009 Apr 19
1
Trouble with PowerMan UPS
Hi, I get a trouble using nut with PowerMan Back Pro N 1400 Plus ~# /lib/nut/megatec -DDDDD -a pman Network UPS Tools - Megatec protocol driver 1.6 (2.4.1) send_to_all: SETINFO driver.parameter.port "/dev/ttyS0" debug level is '5' DTR=1, RTS=0 Starting UPS detection process... Asking for UPS information [I]... I => OK [# PCSTAR-PRO V1.02-2411] I VALUES => [
2015 Apr 14
2
Registering Windows 2012 impossible into samba4 after migration
hello, We've just migrated our samba PDC v3.4.5 (FreeBSD) to samba v4.1.17 (Debian wheezy) with samba4 classic upgrade. Most of the stations works fine. When I try to register a Windows 2012 as a member into the new Samba AD, Windows 2012 says it cannot authenticate the user used for registering the new host into the domain. Of course, this user have admin privileges into the AD target
2008 Oct 04
3
Joining forces with the Network UPS Tools
Hi Powermen ;-) I recently came across the Powerman project (http://sourceforge.net/projects/powerman/), pointed by Tony Merenda, from Opengear (thanks Tony). Congrats for your work in this area! I've thought a bit about Powerman and NUT since then... NUT currently supports hosts of UPSs and few PDUs (RPCs), and provides tons of features: http://test.networkupstools.org
2008 May 24
1
More info about Unitek UPS not working with Megatec driver
Hi again, I tested several times using the Megatec driver from nut 2.2.2 to no avail, as it definitely never "sees" the UPS. Always getting : # drivers/megatec -DDD -a Alpha Network UPS Tools 2.2.2 - Megatec protocol driver 1.5.14 [megatec] Carlos Rodrigues (c) 2003-2008 debug level is '3' Starting UPS detection process... Asking for UPS status [Q1]... Q1 => FAILED
2008 Jul 01
8
megatec process die
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20080701/3140c7d2/attachment.htm
2009 Oct 19
1
Megatec driver, this UPS has an unsupported combination of battery voltage/number of batteries, Infosec model E4 / 5000
Ubuntu 8.04 Nut : Version: 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu7.2 Hello, I choose the megatec driver and I connect through a serial cable. I receive a "This UPS has an unsupported combination of battery voltage/number of batteries" message. I know this is not an error but I don't really what I have to do next. Here is the result of /lib/nut/megatec -a infosec -DDD debug level is '3'
2009 May 31
1
Can't connect to UPS [mustek] (megatec-mustek): No such file or directory
NUT recently stopped working on my debian. I'm not sure which upgrade broke it. ups.conf: [mustek] driver = megatec port = /dev/ttyS0 desc = "mustek ups" # upsd -DDDD Network UPS Tools upsd 2.4.1 listen_add: added ::1:3493 listen_add: added 127.0.0.1:3493 setuptcp: try to bind to 127.0.0.1 port 3493 listening on 127.0.0.1 port 3493 setuptcp: try to bind
2008 May 18
1
REGRESSION: New "megatec" driver does't work for UPS that was managed by old fentonups driver
Hi there, A couple years ago, I had patched the "fentonups" nut driver to allow it to work with my Unitek Alpha 500 UPS. My patch had been accepted and incorporated in the standard fentonups driver. I have had no time to stay involved in the "nut" project since (and besides this I'm not a developper...). 2 days ago I upgraded from Ubuntu Gutsy to Ubuntu Hardy and got
2008 Oct 20
1
Megatec driver status [was: Re: UPS (Megatec) with strange voltage values]
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Arjen de Korte <nut+devel at de-korte.org> wrote: > Citeren Carlos Rodrigues <cefrodrigues at gmail.com>: > >> BTW, the patch has a small typo in one of the comments: "applied to >> battery.volage" :) > > I'll leave that up to you to correct. Since it is only a comment, it won't > be visible to innocent users
2010 Oct 13
2
ups nut-2.4.x bug. driver megatec forceshutdown may dont work.
2010/10/13 Vitaly Lavrov > I found bug in nut/drivers/megatec.c - force shutdown may dont work. > See patch. > could you please give a try to blazer, since it is set to replace megatec with 2.6.0. Arjen will quite probably comment on your patch usefulness within the blazer scope. thanks for your contrib. cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton -
2007 Jul 06
3
energizerups and bestups -> megatec?
Hi! I don't know how I missed it before, but "bestups" seems to implement mostly the same protocol as megatec. Is anybody out there using this driver willing to try "megatec" to see if it works? AFAIK, the only difference seems to be the command that gets the UPS identification data ("I" on "megatec", "ID" on "bestups"), but
2007 Jul 06
3
energizerups and bestups -> megatec?
Hi! I don't know how I missed it before, but "bestups" seems to implement mostly the same protocol as megatec. Is anybody out there using this driver willing to try "megatec" to see if it works? AFAIK, the only difference seems to be the command that gets the UPS identification data ("I" on "megatec", "ID" on "bestups"), but
2006 Dec 04
4
megatec and some changes to cmdvartab and new-names.txt
I had some free time this weekend, and made some long overdue changes to "megatec". The thing is, these changes lead to a couple of questions that I must ask before I go on and "svn commit" them: 1) The blazer, fentonups, esupssmart, ippon, sms and mustek drivers are now completely covered and all of their functionality should now be present in megatec, and also every model
2006 Nov 01
2
megatec driver and usb-to-serial converters
Hi all, Currently, the "megatec" driver only supports UPSes which have a serial (RS232) interface. However, I'm under the impression that most of the models that speak the megatec protocol, and have an USB interface, just have a standard serial-to-USB converter inside. This being the case, there should be a "/dev/ttyUSBx" device which the megatec driver could use just as
2006 Nov 01
2
megatec driver and usb-to-serial converters
Hi all, Currently, the "megatec" driver only supports UPSes which have a serial (RS232) interface. However, I'm under the impression that most of the models that speak the megatec protocol, and have an USB interface, just have a standard serial-to-USB converter inside. This being the case, there should be a "/dev/ttyUSBx" device which the megatec driver could use just as
2007 Jan 23
2
Voltage override in megatec and megatec-over-usb [was: Re: nut-2.0.5 megatec + Online Xanto]
On 1/23/07, Henning Brauer <hb-nut@bsws.de> wrote: > good new first: the megatec driverin 2.0.5 now works with the Online > Xanto S3000R here - well, for the very basics. > > the UPS has NO way ofidentifying itself. It also does not respond to > the power ratings query ("F"). I previously used a hacked up fentonups > driver. This means the driver cannot figure out