similar to: megatec driver floods syslog with "UPS lost/re-established" messages

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "megatec driver floods syslog with "UPS lost/re-established" messages"

2009 Dec 28
4
Megatec driver floods logs #2 & mail notifications
Hi there! I'm a n00b NUT user trying to get it running on RHEL5 and actually do something useful for me. Few questions: 1) I want it to notify me by email on power loss and power back events. I can't find any sample scripts for this purpose... Where shall I look for them? 2) So far, I've backported the package from Fedora and got my Ablerex running (previously used with Upsilon /
2006 Aug 04
1
RE nut drivers
Hi Alexander, > I've UPS named PowerMan RealSmart 1000, it is not listed in > compatibility list. I found that it works with "fentonups" driver and > have ups.model "Unknown S163-1000". Ithink "1000" is from capacity - > I've seen in Internet someone have RealSmart 800 identified "S163-800". > Also PowerMan have
2008 Sep 30
5
Corrupted transaction log file / record size too small
I recently upgradeded dovecot on one of our servers from version 1.0.10 to version 1.1.3. Ever since, we've been seeing occasional errors similar to this sequence (with the username and IP addresses elided): Sep 30 00:09:56 alcor dovecot: pop3-login: Login: [4954], XXXX, NNN.NNN.NN.NNN Sep 30 00:09:56 alcor dovecot: wrapper[5006]: pop3, XXXX, NNN.NNN.NN.NNN Sep 30 00:09:56 alcor
2006 Aug 16
1
default_realm problem
Hello List, I've upgraded to dovecot from FreeBSD ports, changed the config from previous 0.99 version, but meet a problem with %d variable beeing empty in userdb static configuration directive. Our server supports multiple domains, e.g. 'mxc.ru' and 'mail.mxc.ru'. Users can log into using their full e-mail address like antonm at mxc.ru or antonm at mail.mxc.ru, but the
2008 May 24
1
More info about Unitek UPS not working with Megatec driver
Hi again, I tested several times using the Megatec driver from nut 2.2.2 to no avail, as it definitely never "sees" the UPS. Always getting : # drivers/megatec -DDD -a Alpha Network UPS Tools 2.2.2 - Megatec protocol driver 1.5.14 [megatec] Carlos Rodrigues (c) 2003-2008 debug level is '3' Starting UPS detection process... Asking for UPS status [Q1]... Q1 => FAILED
2008 May 18
1
REGRESSION: New "megatec" driver does't work for UPS that was managed by old fentonups driver
Hi there, A couple years ago, I had patched the "fentonups" nut driver to allow it to work with my Unitek Alpha 500 UPS. My patch had been accepted and incorporated in the standard fentonups driver. I have had no time to stay involved in the "nut" project since (and besides this I'm not a developper...). 2 days ago I upgraded from Ubuntu Gutsy to Ubuntu Hardy and got
2009 May 31
1
Can't connect to UPS [mustek] (megatec-mustek): No such file or directory
NUT recently stopped working on my debian. I'm not sure which upgrade broke it. ups.conf: [mustek] driver = megatec port = /dev/ttyS0 desc = "mustek ups" # upsd -DDDD Network UPS Tools upsd 2.4.1 listen_add: added ::1:3493 listen_add: added 127.0.0.1:3493 setuptcp: try to bind to 127.0.0.1 port 3493 listening on 127.0.0.1 port 3493 setuptcp: try to bind
2008 Oct 20
1
Megatec driver status [was: Re: UPS (Megatec) with strange voltage values]
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Arjen de Korte <nut+devel at de-korte.org> wrote: > Citeren Carlos Rodrigues <cefrodrigues at gmail.com>: > >> BTW, the patch has a small typo in one of the comments: "applied to >> battery.volage" :) > > I'll leave that up to you to correct. Since it is only a comment, it won't > be visible to innocent users
2009 Oct 19
1
Megatec driver, this UPS has an unsupported combination of battery voltage/number of batteries, Infosec model E4 / 5000
Ubuntu 8.04 Nut : Version: 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu7.2 Hello, I choose the megatec driver and I connect through a serial cable. I receive a "This UPS has an unsupported combination of battery voltage/number of batteries" message. I know this is not an error but I don't really what I have to do next. Here is the result of /lib/nut/megatec -a infosec -DDD debug level is '3'
2007 Jul 06
3
energizerups and bestups -> megatec?
Hi! I don't know how I missed it before, but "bestups" seems to implement mostly the same protocol as megatec. Is anybody out there using this driver willing to try "megatec" to see if it works? AFAIK, the only difference seems to be the command that gets the UPS identification data ("I" on "megatec", "ID" on "bestups"), but
2007 Jul 06
3
energizerups and bestups -> megatec?
Hi! I don't know how I missed it before, but "bestups" seems to implement mostly the same protocol as megatec. Is anybody out there using this driver willing to try "megatec" to see if it works? AFAIK, the only difference seems to be the command that gets the UPS identification data ("I" on "megatec", "ID" on "bestups"), but
2010 Oct 13
2
ups nut-2.4.x bug. driver megatec forceshutdown may dont work.
2010/10/13 Vitaly Lavrov > I found bug in nut/drivers/megatec.c - force shutdown may dont work. > See patch. > could you please give a try to blazer, since it is set to replace megatec with 2.6.0. Arjen will quite probably comment on your patch usefulness within the blazer scope. thanks for your contrib. cheers, Arnaud -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton -
2008 Oct 27
1
Megatec and Batteries
Hi to all, I am new on the lists but using nut on megatec for last two and half years. Looking at archives I saw that there is a lot of people confused about battery voltage and I want to help them to clear out some stuff in their heads. This story is based on my experience with UPS devices from 600VA to 20kVA, from single phase systems to three phase systems, with battery packs from 1
2006 Nov 01
2
megatec driver and usb-to-serial converters
Hi all, Currently, the "megatec" driver only supports UPSes which have a serial (RS232) interface. However, I'm under the impression that most of the models that speak the megatec protocol, and have an USB interface, just have a standard serial-to-USB converter inside. This being the case, there should be a "/dev/ttyUSBx" device which the megatec driver could use just as
2006 Nov 01
2
megatec driver and usb-to-serial converters
Hi all, Currently, the "megatec" driver only supports UPSes which have a serial (RS232) interface. However, I'm under the impression that most of the models that speak the megatec protocol, and have an USB interface, just have a standard serial-to-USB converter inside. This being the case, there should be a "/dev/ttyUSBx" device which the megatec driver could use just as
2006 Dec 04
4
megatec and some changes to cmdvartab and new-names.txt
I had some free time this weekend, and made some long overdue changes to "megatec". The thing is, these changes lead to a couple of questions that I must ask before I go on and "svn commit" them: 1) The blazer, fentonups, esupssmart, ippon, sms and mustek drivers are now completely covered and all of their functionality should now be present in megatec, and also every model
2008 Feb 12
1
SMS and Megatec protocol Diffs
On Feb 11, 2008 5:30 PM, Marcio Gomes <mpg at microlink.com.br> wrote: > I change the if in [OFF] detect state to, in original way, if you send a > reset.watchdog, the UPS goes > to OFF state in clients, but it is not correct, because UPS is OL and > Shutdown are in progress, but > the power is not OFF First of all, thanks for the patch. But I have a few comments: Are you
2007 Mar 10
2
Belkin F6C900-UNV and the megatec driver
Greetings! Thanks to all the developers who have made this project so far. Searching for a Linux based Belkin UPS monitor led me straight to the Network UPS Tools. I have bought a Belkin F6C900-UNV (900VA) for use on a Slackware 10.2 server to replace an older APC model that died suddenly. So far I have successfully managed to get NUT 2.0.5 compiled and configured and found that this Belkin
2007 Feb 08
3
Re: [nut-commits] svn commit r801 - in branches/megatec-usb: . drivers
Hi Alexander, thanks for your good work on the megatec_usb driver. I have made a few more (cosmetic) changes. Is the driver now working stably for your device? In particular, do the instant commands (and particularly "upsdrvctl -k") work properly? In this case, we could hopefully mark the device as "supported" and merge the driver to the main branch. There is still the
2008 Jan 23
1
Some question about megatec vs. powercom
Hi folks! We have a Powercom Vanguard 6000 running here. It seems to be supported by the megatec driver within nut. So I get everything out of it exept the battery status. When I run Nut, it says: Megatec protocol UPS detected [UPS Model 6K Ver Y1.3]. This UPS has an unsupported combination of battery voltage/number of batteries. The "battery.charge" value will be bogus. So I would