similar to: Megatec battery level

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20080701/3140c7d2/attachment.htm

Hello Nut List! I have 2 "Lacerda 10KVA" UPS that returns strange values for Q1 and F commands: Q1 (215.0 215.0 219.0 004 60.0 2.27 39.0 00000001 F #220.0 045 240.0 60.0 At least what I know about Megatec, It seems to say that it has a 240.0 V battery with currently 2.27V. Quite strange. I contacted Lacerda to help me interpret this values and they said that 2.27 is just 1 element

Hello, I'm trying to get my UPS working with nut-hal-drivers, and it seems be detected correctly with Megatec protocol, but it provides wrong battery level. I read that I can use battvolts option to fix this problem, but HAL version of nut does not come with any config files. So, I'm guess it should be somehow fixed in sources? Parameters of Ippon Back Comfo Pro 800: VA = 800 max

On Feb 11, 2008 5:30 PM, Marcio Gomes <mpg at microlink.com.br> wrote: > I change the if in [OFF] detect state to, in original way, if you send a > reset.watchdog, the UPS goes > to OFF state in clients, but it is not correct, because UPS is OL and > Shutdown are in progress, but > the power is not OFF First of all, thanks for the patch. But I have a few comments: Are you

Hi, Charles, On Wed, 2 May 2007 07:58:08 -0400, you wrote: > > Will that be enough to make it useable as a contribution? I believe > > the more sensible values for 36V UPS'es will be useful to other models > > than the one I have, too. > > Sounds good, but I don't think I saw it hit the list yet... I now have the following in megatec.c: static BatteryVolts

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Arjen de Korte <nut+devel at de-korte.org> wrote: > Citeren Carlos Rodrigues <cefrodrigues at gmail.com>: > >> BTW, the patch has a small typo in one of the comments: "applied to >> battery.volage" :) > > I'll leave that up to you to correct. Since it is only a comment, it won't > be visible to innocent users

Hi, everyone, I've recently bought a UPS from Mecer. This is a South African brand that basically resells Mustek hardware, and this UPS is no exception; it's a Mustek product. It does come with software for Linux, but that is terrible (the background process that monitors the UPS is written in Java and needs a terminal to start properly, so you can't run it from a startup script...

Hi, everyone, I've recently bought a UPS from Mecer. This is a South African brand that basically resells Mustek hardware, and this UPS is no exception; it's a Mustek product. It does come with software for Linux, but that is terrible (the background process that monitors the UPS is written in Java and needs a terminal to start properly, so you can't run it from a startup script...

Hi folks! We have a Powercom Vanguard 6000 running here. It seems to be supported by the megatec driver within nut. So I get everything out of it exept the battery status. When I run Nut, it says: Megatec protocol UPS detected [UPS Model 6K Ver Y1.3]. This UPS has an unsupported combination of battery voltage/number of batteries. The "battery.charge" value will be bogus. So I would

On 1/23/07, Henning Brauer <hb-nut@bsws.de> wrote: > good new first: the megatec driverin 2.0.5 now works with the Online > Xanto S3000R here - well, for the very basics. > > the UPS has NO way ofidentifying itself. It also does not respond to > the power ratings query ("F"). I previously used a hacked up fentonups > driver. This means the driver cannot figure out

Ubuntu 8.04 Nut : Version: 2.2.1-2.1ubuntu7.2 Hello, I choose the megatec driver and I connect through a serial cable. I receive a "This UPS has an unsupported combination of battery voltage/number of batteries" message. I know this is not an error but I don't really what I have to do next. Here is the result of /lib/nut/megatec -a infosec -DDD debug level is '3'

Hi Jayson, I forward your request to the right place. Carlos (or some other) will have an answer, or at least some questions for you. -- Arnaud 2008/6/27 Jayson Anderson <jayson.anderson at gmail.com>: > Greetings Arnaud, > > I wrote you some time ago about whether NUT would support the Belkin > F6H550-UPS device in the future. > > You had replied and mentioned to send

2008/4/10, David Erosa <david.erosa at gmail.com>: > Public bug reported: > > Binary package hint: nut > > After updating to last nut package (2.2.1-2.1ubuntu6), the megatec_usb > driver seems to be working, except for the charge percentage: > > $ /lib/nut/megatec_usb -DDDDD -a SAI > ... > Checking device (0665/5161) (001/007) > - VendorID: 0665 >

Hi, I am not sure if you are the list to hit with this, but NUT's megatec driver support ours "Numeric Digital 3000 sw" UPS - at least that's what it claims on front- at the Watcher telescope at Boyden Observatory / RSA. I wasn't able to find manufacturer, but it looks Numeric is some existing UPS factory. I did not receive any informations from manufacturer, so I believ

Hi all, Currently, the "megatec" driver only supports UPSes which have a serial (RS232) interface. However, I'm under the impression that most of the models that speak the megatec protocol, and have an USB interface, just have a standard serial-to-USB converter inside. This being the case, there should be a "/dev/ttyUSBx" device which the megatec driver could use just as

Hi all, Currently, the "megatec" driver only supports UPSes which have a serial (RS232) interface. However, I'm under the impression that most of the models that speak the megatec protocol, and have an USB interface, just have a standard serial-to-USB converter inside. This being the case, there should be a "/dev/ttyUSBx" device which the megatec driver could use just as

I had some free time this weekend, and made some long overdue changes to "megatec". The thing is, these changes lead to a couple of questions that I must ask before I go on and "svn commit" them: 1) The blazer, fentonups, esupssmart, ippon, sms and mustek drivers are now completely covered and all of their functionality should now be present in megatec, and also every model

Hi! I don't know how I missed it before, but "bestups" seems to implement mostly the same protocol as megatec. Is anybody out there using this driver willing to try "megatec" to see if it works? AFAIK, the only difference seems to be the command that gets the UPS identification data ("I" on "megatec", "ID" on "bestups"), but

Hi! I don't know how I missed it before, but "bestups" seems to implement mostly the same protocol as megatec. Is anybody out there using this driver willing to try "megatec" to see if it works? AFAIK, the only difference seems to be the command that gets the UPS identification data ("I" on "megatec", "ID" on "bestups"), but

Hi there, A couple years ago, I had patched the "fentonups" nut driver to allow it to work with my Unitek Alpha 500 UPS. My patch had been accepted and incorporated in the standard fentonups driver. I have had no time to stay involved in the "nut" project since (and besides this I'm not a developper...). 2 days ago I upgraded from Ubuntu Gutsy to Ubuntu Hardy and got