similar to: 10.0.0-rc1: won't start: "empty buf size"

Hello, I wonder if anyone else has noticed this. I see a pair of calls to pipe() within the codec_g729a, and suddenly, I have a leaked file descriptor that remains until asterisk dies. Now, maybe no-one sees this, mainly because I have no g729 licenses on the machines where this happens. And conversely, I haven't yet studied servers that do have licenses. Why have codec_g729a.so loaded if

android email will not play wav49 file attachments. See: http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=1712 Now I'm getting a lot of pressure to change the format used in voicemail. Here's what I've got: format = wav49|gsm I'd like to change it to format = gsm|wav49, but the voicemail.conf.sample says "Don't Change the Format Unless You REALLY Know What

I'm trying to allow access to the office from home. But the ip provider (cablevision) blocks udp 5060. I can see the register packets leaving on wireshark, but nothing received by office. Changed to port to 6111 and now the packets show up. In the server I've set port=6111 in the device in sip.conf, but * is NOT listening for 6111: netstat -an | grep 5060 tcp 0 0

I've been lurking on the dev discussion on creating nat=auto. It all leads me to think there's no reason to use nat=no. We have about 60 internal sip extensions connected to an multihomed asterisk box where the external ip is not nat'ed. Each of the internal sip contexts has nat=no. On startup I get a slew of warnings about intruders being able to distinguish real extensions. But

I'm using iaxagent on a Droid X to connect by IAX to 1.8.3 at the office. 1.8.3 has sip phones. The audio is fine on the Droid X side. On the office side, they hear an echo of _their_ speech, not mine. The office uses sip-providers generally without any echo problem. Where do I start to figure this out? How do I narrow it down? Can I figure out if it is an iaxagent problem? Could using

I'm trying to use Asterisk as a PSTN simulator to run performance tests for echo cancellation algorithms. I'm using the following configuration: SIP <-----> Asterisk 1 <----> Asterisk 2 <----> Echo() Asterisk 1 and Asterisk 2 are connected using E1. Echo() is the dialplan application. The problem is the high delay using this configuration: 20 ms only in Asterisk 2.

We are using res_fax_digium with a Sangoma PRI card on asterisk 1.8.13 The docs at http://docs.digium.com/FAX/fax_for_asterisk_admin_manual.pdf indicate v34 is supported, but when I enable it I get the message "res_fax_digium.c:1624 dgm_fax_new: V.34 not supported, will be ignored." Is v34 only supported with SpanDSP? Also, the res_fax.conf.sample does not indicate v34 as a valid

Hello list, I need to know about Asterisk's friendly nature with RTCP. I've phones which support RTCP and they connect to the outer world via multiple carriers. In one of my recent packet traces I've observed that the caller initiated a call with rtcp string in SDP while for the same call dialling our from Asterisk to the carrier has no RTCP string in SDP ! Can anyone please tell why

Hi, I'm having some questions related to echo cancellation configuration on a Digium board enabled systems (B410P, TE420, TE420B, ....) for cases when a hardware ech canceller is present or not. I read in TEXXX manual that when setting echocancel=yes in chan_dahdi.conf on a VPMOCT64-equiped system, 128ms hardware echo cancellation was enabled. 1. I'm correct thinking that it is then

Hi all, Do you have an idea on the best way on how to implement a system with multiple Asterisk servers with BLF working in such a way that a peer on one server can subscribe to another peer on the other server in a seamless manner? Has anyone set-up a system like this before? Thanks! Regards, Ronald -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello, Which one of these ensures that SIP packets are sent and received in a secure format so that users using public wifi don't allow MITM type of attacks or others can't read the plaintext SIP packet info. VPN is not an option. Looking for 2nd most secure to VPN. P.S. Are both options part of the configs of Asterisk or need modules to be selected and installed before doing the

Bad day today. Why this new JIRA system not working. I have created issue and submit and i got blank page.. Please someone help me to create BUG!!!!!!!!!!! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110608/e99afa31/attachment.htm>

Hello, Trying to set up res_fax_spandsp. Based on https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/T.38+Fax+Gateway I wrote this in my extensions.conf: exten => 306,1,NoOp(Fax transmission) same => n,Set(FAXOPT(gateway)=yes) same => n,Dial(DAHDI/3) ----->FXS port to fax machine same => n,Hangup() Call flow Im trying to pull out is as follows: Zoiper -->

Hello, Im looking to buy a digium phone D70 unit just for testing on lab; to really understand the phone and features. I cant find any website with opinions; any here? Are they really valuable to the price? (D70 quite expensive) Does the SDK for building apps is usable? Can you build powerfull apps? Examples? Many thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

From asterisk -cvvvvv == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/chan_dahdi.conf': == Found == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/users.conf': == Found -- Automatically generated pseudo channel [Nov 11 17:43:28] WARNING[5756]: chan_dahdi.c:18155 process_dahdi: Ignoring any changes to 'userbase' (on reload) at line 23. [Nov 11 17:43:28] WARNING[5756]: chan_dahdi.c:18155 process_dahdi:

Howdy All, I'm considering Asterisk / Digium as a replacement to my existing phone switch. I need to continue to be able to push analog lines between multiple buildings in a campus environment. The Digium Analog 410 Card manual states it's not recommended to go beyond 1500 feet distance for an FXS card, and no line should leave the building or be bundled. The 2400 Series Manual does

Hi guys, I want to ask if its possible to make calls using one SIP account, The problem is like this : I have an iPhone app and I want all my users to call the same extension which is virtual extension to my call center, so the iPhone app will be using the same SIP account for all users lets say for example: iPhone users uses 6000 at mydomain to call 9000 at my domain(which is the call center)

I upgraded my server from Fedora Core 4 to Fedora Core 5. I was wondering if anybody else has run into the problem and know's the fix? I recompiled asterisk and if I don't have the /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_g729a.so file in place it works. I use or used to use the licensed G729 Codec from Digium. This is the error message from asterisk -vvg: [app_playback.so] => (Sound File

Hi list. I have Asterisk installed on a Debian 1.8 6 64-bit. What happens is the following, some channels are not being hangup properly. They run the hangup in dialplan, but the output of the command "core show channels" shows several channels with status "rsrvd." Checking the server's memory, the "top" command shows multiple processes and stopped using the

Hi, folks. I'm having a heck of a time trying to get outgoing T38 faxing (I don't need inbound right now) working with FFA and Gafachi. G711 faxing works (as well as can be expected over the internet), but I want the higher reliability of T38. I'm running Asterisk 10-beta1. When I drop my callfile in to make the call, I get this: -- Attempting call on SIP/18884732963 at