similar to: DID and the Caller ID for outgoing

I'm trying to connect a Cisco 7942 to my Asterisk box. I have a 7960 and 7912 currently connected and functioning. I'm trying to use the recommendations from here: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+phone+cisco+79x1+xml+configuration+files+for+SIP I have created a "XMLDefault.cnf.xml" and it took the latest image but the phone states it's unprovisioned? Any

continuing discussions of 79xx issues. i've seen referenced and am experiencing difficulty getting a 7970 to work behind NAT to a public asterisk server. i am successful with 7960s. 1. SIP load is 70.8-3-3SR2S 2. config works fine if 7970 is connecting to an asterisk server a local LAN (same subnet) 3. when debugging it in a NAT'd environment I see the register and

Hi, ? We are new to IP phone firmware upgradation (Sorry if it is a re-post of previous question(s)). ? Recently we have bought a cisco 7942G IP phone. It currently has SIP 42.9-0-2SR1S firmware loaded on it. We do not see any option to configure a SIP Proxy where we can provide SIP Server (Asterisk PC/Device)? IP address (with current firmware on it) to register it with Asterisk. ? Do we need to

Hi, I have been using Cisco 7960's with Asterisk for years. I am trying get a 7961 working and have a problem. In my configuration, not all of my line appearances register to the same Asterisk SIP server. I have an Asterisk server at home and another at work. My Line 1 button registers to the home server and my Line 2 button registers to the work server. This has worked for years

Anyone have the 7970 xml config for sip yet? Aaron

Hi Everyone, I am having some issues getting my 7961 working with Trixbox. I have loaded the SIP code (8-3-3SR2) fine but when the phone boots up it goes into an unprovisioned state. A status message shows up and says ?Error Verifying Config Info?. I have read quite a bit on this topic (getting 7961?s to work with Asterisk and TB) and only came across a few postings where other people

Hi all, I was initially going to send this email to a thread on llvm-commits where David explained the issue with poison and select to me, but then some quick googling led me to this thread. I've been thinking about a possible semantics for poison values in a certain way: The key semantic difference between undef and poison, as I understand it, is that when justifying an execution trace the

> Is there some uniform way to find data dependence between two (sets of) > instructions? There is use/def data, and there is AliasAnalysis > information, but I am looking for something more high-level and uniform. > I guess I am missing then was abandoned. Any ideas? Nope, there currently isn't a uniform interface for doing so, at least not at the LLVM level. As you said,

> What specific information do you need? All my experiments eventually analyze or transform the data dependence graph, which takes into account both registers and aliasing information. Because there is already a built-in support for graphs, I hoped there is also built-in support for data dependence graphs. That would allow, for example, to display them naturally with dot utility.

> > No, this would have to be a void side effecting instruction which is a bit > different. What do you mean by "void side effecting instruction"? I'm not sure I fully understand what you mean. The flag register is an implicit register added to the selected > MachineInstr's operands. Is this something that is always done by LLVM? Is it me who is telling to LLVM

John, Sanjoy, Nuno, David, Thanks for the tip, below are the relevant posts from the archives. I am suggesting something similar to Dan's third option below (Tue Nov 29 2011 "the nsw story”, Dan Gohman), when hoisting an instruction with ‘nsw’ it looses the ‘nsw’ attribute, but without saying “add-nsw is a fully side-effecting instruction”. This option was back then seen by

> WELCOME TO MY WORLD :D > (Hey, are the new foobar packages done, how about the xwyz packages) > Thanks, > JOhnny Hughes When you snip the rest of my post man that last request sounds really bad on its own. Sorry guys. I saw the "uploading the new DVD's" a few days ago and thought I would ask. I really do not want to put anyone out and please do not go through any

Oops sorry, ugh another poor selection of words as I meant to say "When I saw the rest of my post snipped, I then realized that last request sounds really bad, which was not my intention. > When you snip the rest of my post man that last > request sounds really bad on its own. Sorry guys. I > saw the "uploading the new DVD's" a few days ago and > thought I would

Hi All My first experience with syslinux I have created a debian live bootable environment. Which creates a fat16 format USB-HDD and then uses syslinux to boot up with (Provided the hardware allows you to boot from USB). When I plug the USB Stick into say a windows machine it mounts the USB drive and you can see the linux kernel files syslinux and other files Question: Is there a way to

I would like to experiment with testing the fit of a loess model against the fit from an ordinary linear regression. The 1988 JASA paper by Cleveland and Devlin *appears* to indicate that this can be done, at least ``approximately''. They, as I read it, advocate the use of an ANOVA type test with degree of freedom chosen to make the ``F ratio'' have an approximate F distribution

Is the new Isolinux series effecting hardware in a different way as 2.xx series? I'm getting a system crash in VMware. I guess this is a Vmware issue, but thought you might want to know. 2.xx series works OK for me. I get to see 8 dots when loading a 360KB imagefile, following by crash message mentioned below. Replacing MEMDISK by old version does not matter, only replacing isolinux.bin 3.05

http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/CodeGenerator.html "A SelectionDAG has designated "Entry" and "Root" nodes. The Entry node is always a marker node with an Opcode of ISD::TokenFactor. The Root node is the final side-effecting node in the token chain. For example, in a single basic block function, this would be the return node." Isn't it should be: "...The

The LLVM projects page says this: "We need some way to reason about errno. Consider a loop like this: for () x += sqrt(loopinvariant);" and: "The hard part of this project is figuring out how to describe errno in the optimizer" The important property here is the idempotence of sqrt(): it is potentially side-effecting, but that side effect is independent of the

On Nov 28, 2010, at 8:29 PM, Isaac Asay wrote: > > I am continuing to look over the code in the ARMLoadStoreOptimizer.cpp file, but I was wondering if you had a specific suggestion or a documentation resource that I could use to perform this instruction rearrangement in an LLVM idiomatic way. Using my algorithm, I already know where I can move MachineInstrs without effecting program

> Chain doesn't guarantee that operations on parallel chains don't get interleaved This would be a sequential chain... > This is the case for all operations expanded as library calls I think their originating node already has a chain (i.e. mem operand or side effect in llvm-ir). My case is a arithmetic node without ordering constraints (divrem) getting lowered into sth that _does_