similar to: ForkCDR and asterisk 1.6.1

Dear members of the list; I am writing in the hope to get some help with a very peculiar problem with my new asterisk 1.6.0.1 installation. The same code runs on version 1.2 without problems, but it seems the behaviour has changed (also on 1.4.7, which I tried). Please consider the following extension: exten => 1213,1,Answer exten => 1213,n,Set(counter=X) exten =>

Hello, I'm looking for a way to restore old behaviour (before Arkadia patch #0010668) of ForkCDR application in 1.4.18 I've done some research directly in the code (cdr.c & forkcdr.c), but can't find any flag. I am just f*c*ed or do you have something to suggest ? :) Thank you for help. Mathieu

Hello, When I bridge an incoming and outgoing call (attempting to simulate call-forwarding) I'm only getting one CDR -- that of the outgoing call. A (PSTN) calls B (residing on Asterisk) and the Asterisk calls C (cell phone on PSTN) and bridges the call. The only CDR created is from B to C. I have even tried using Answer() and ForkCDR() to get two CDRs, but to no avail. I am starting to

Hi, I'm tryng to place a call through Asterisk Manager Originate Action. Since I want separate CDR for each of the two legs of the call, I'm forking CDR with ForkCDR as the first Channel has picked up. The problem is that, while the first CDR is fine, in the second one the "answer" field is always empty, "billsec" field is 0 and "disposition" field is

Hi Guys, The ForkCDR is doing pretty well, except for the call disposition. The time stamps are great, but the disposition always reads answered, even when the call is busy or not answered at all. It should read BUSY and NO ANSWER. I can send a snippet of the CDR record with forked calls for an example if needed. I think the record is not forking properly, but is maintaining the disposition

Gang, I'm having this error pop up when I do a ForkCDR, and I'm not sure how to get around it. Here are a few log lines: Nov 8 10:37:08 VERBOSE[28079] logger.c: -- Executing ForkCDR("Zap/49-1", "") in new stack Nov 8 10:37:08 WARNING[28079] app_forkcdr.c: Channel does not have a CDR The scenario occurs like this: I use a .call file to generate a call on

I've been Googling all morning and searching voip-info.org but not quite finding what I'm looking for. I've read that you can modify the billing/account information on a CDR via AGI but I can't find an example or a "how to". I'd like to then assign specific accounts in the CDRs. Possible? Thanks, PB -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hello, CDR fans! I'm looking at some issues brought forward over time: 12726/10668: someone wants me to revert the changes I made via bug 10668, last Sept; (that's they are messing him up. And I didn't do the change suggested in ForkCDR, for fear of lousing up folks depending on current behavior. Which probably sparked: 11721 :

Hi guys, I am trying to make a trunk between two asterisk system SIP Trunk on Asterisk 1.6 but I cannt make it work, can any body help me plz? Thank you

I'm starting to look into binary instruction encodings in TableGen, and I'm a bit confused on how the instruction fields are populated. Perhaps I'm just being dense, but I cannot see how SDAG operands are translated into the encoding fields. Can someone please explain the following snippet from the PPC back-end. The AND instruction in PPC is defined as: 1011 def AND :

In our generated asm code we've got a constraint such that two registers in a ternary op have to be in different "banks", best illustrated with an example: add r1,r2,r1 # r1 <- r2 + r1 The problem here is that the first operand (the receiver of the value) is in the same "bank" as the 3rd operand (r1 again). This will cause an extra cycle to be burned. As it turns

Not sure what you mean. I.OutOperandList == (outs CPU16Regs:$rx) I.InOperandList == (ins CPU16Regs:$ry, CPU16Regs:$rz) On 07/02/2012 09:26 PM, Sean Silva wrote: > I think you're missing the template args for `FRRR16_ins` in the first > argument. The switch in TGParser::ParseType() doesn't cover the case > of types with template args though... which makes me wonder what is

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard at amd.com>wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 03:25:14PM -0400, Justin Holewinski wrote: > > I'm starting to look into binary instruction encodings in TableGen, and > I'm > > a bit confused on how the instruction fields are populated. Perhaps I'm > > just being dense, but I cannot see how SDAG

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 24, 2012, at 3:52 PM, Justin Holewinski < > justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard at amd.com>wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 03:25:14PM -0400, Justin Holewinski wrote: >> > I'm

class FRRR16_ins<bits<2> _f, string asmstr, list<dag> pattern, InstrItinClass itin> : // ... This class has template args. You don't specify them in the first template arg of class ArithLogicR16<FRRR16_ins I, SDNode OpNode, bit isComm = 0>: // ... --Sean Silva On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 2:29 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > Not sure what you mean.

No, I don't. Cheers, Gary Dale Johannesen wrote: > This looks OK to check in, do you have write access? > > On Aug 21, 2008, at 6:38 AMPDT, Gary Benson wrote: > > >Dale Johannesen wrote: > >>On Aug 19, 2008, at 7:18 AMPDT, Gary Benson wrote: > >>>I'm trying to implement llvm.memory.barrier on PowerPC. I've > >>>modelled my patch

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 03:25:14PM -0400, Justin Holewinski wrote: > I'm starting to look into binary instruction encodings in TableGen, and I'm > a bit confused on how the instruction fields are populated. Perhaps I'm > just being dense, but I cannot see how SDAG operands are translated into > the encoding fields. Can someone please explain the following snippet from

I've filed the following bug. Maybe I'm doing something stupid here or maybe someone knows of a workaround. The following fragment from mips16 (not yet checked into main source). The problem is that I should be able to pass parameters: I.OutOperandList, I.InOperandList But instead, I must back substitute what I know the values of these are. (outs CPU16Regs:$rx), (ins CPU16Regs:$ry,

Hello, i use shorewall for a very long time (2 years or so) and i use it for nat and as firewall....i now use portsentrys to detect portscans but there is one problem...i use the HOWTO from the shorewall mailing list to make portsentry and shorewall work together....but there is one prob portscans get detected and a drop rule is added to shorewall for example shorewall drop 62.178.xxx.xx

I think that what I did originally should have worked and the bug was correct as I reported it. Here is an alternate implementation which has the same problem. class ArithLogicRTest16<string I, SDNode OpNode, bit isComm = 0>: FRRR16<!cast<FRRR16_ins>(I).f, !cast<FRRR16_ins>(I).OutOperandList, !cast<FRRR16_ins>(I).InOperandList,