similar to: Dahdi and BRI NT PtmP [SOLVED]

Hi, In my lab, I'm testing BRI spans in NT/ptmp mode. My setup is: asterisk 11.2.1 libpri 1.4.14 dahdi 2.6.1 wctdm24xxp (HA8 hybrid with B400M) SIP phone <----> Asterisk with HA8 <----> Patton SN4638 <----> Asterisk <----> SIP phone The single BRI line I'm testing remains down: CLI> pri show spans PRI span 1/0: In Alarm, Up, Active I'm quite certain this

Hi Olivier It seems wrong configuration, because according to your mail Asterisk it will be acting as terminal mode (ie Patton gateway acting as network and asterisk as terminal). But Asterisk message is indicated Asterisk a s a NT mode [ 212.226050] wctdm24xxp 0000:0a:01.0: xhfc: Configuring port 0 span 1 in NT mode with termination resistance ENABLED. It could help by checking parameters on

Hi, After an upgrade, I discovered yesterday strange things I would like to share here. Basically, I'me comparing platforms: The first one is a 2.6.26 (Debian Lenny) platform, with Asterisk 1.6.1.18, Libpri 1.4.10.2, Dahdi revision 8853 (must be between 2.3 and 2.5, I think). The second one is a 2.6.32 (Debian Squeeze) platform, with Asterisk 10.5.1, Libpri 1.4.12, Dahdi 2.6.1. Both are

Hi, I need to rebuild a system which has 4 BRI ports and is connected to Point-to-multiPoint lines, in a country where telco often "drop lines for energy savings". I'm planning to use latest 11.4.0 asterisk version along with dahdi and libpri (no misdn). Which version are recommended for Dahdi and Libpri ? My main requirements are, beside having calls coming in and out: - keep a

Hi all, So, we reverted the LibPRI version and tested it, and then tried with the latest version of everything. Still no changes. The BRI line is in PTMP. If we set the configs to PTMP in the genconf_parameters and try it, we get the following: [Jan 21 17:32:20] ERROR[20341]: chan_dahdi.c:12645 dahdi_pri_error: Unable to receive TEI from network! If we set it to PTP (which it is not) we

Hi, As you may know, these ISDN BRI features are very important here in Europe as ISDN Basic Rate Access is very popular among Small & Medium Entreprises. I don't really know why but it seems that in many countries, default is to install small PBX using Point-to-Multipoint (PtMP) mode as opposed to Point-to-Point (PtP) which is the norm for PRI. So basically, in several countries, SME

Hi all, As i tested with Asterisk+dahdi+libpri with openvox BRI with NT mode, the ISDN phone does not work. There is the setting and error. ***********************Enviroment********************************** Asterisk-1.6.1.18 dahdi-linux-2.3.0.1 dahdi-tool-2.30. libpri-1.4.11.2 CentOS-5.5 OpenVox B400P ******************************************************************** In my case , I set prot 1

Hi, I've read that the new dahdi channel supporting B410P doesn't support PtmP when in NT mode. Does it support PtmP when in TE mode ? Cheers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20081209/f422b5d0/attachment.htm

Dear Supports, I was attempting to install BRI Card(OpenVox B800P) with wcb4xxp in NT mode .But I can not make it worked! Could you please give me some hints? Thanks in advance! Here are my environments: ------------------------------ CentOS-5.3 Kernel-2.6.18-164.el5 asterisk-1.6.1.6 dahdi-linux-complete-2.3.0+2.3.0 libpri-1.4.10.2 OpenVox-B800P(the first port is spliting into

Hi, At the moment, libpri /w Asterisk 1.6, Dahdi 2.1, is not supporting NT-Point to multi-point mode. Here (France), most small PBXes are connected to ISDN through BRI trunks in PtmP (don't know why but it seems the general case). So this NT-PtmP function would be very helpful to easily slide an Asterisk box between an existing PBX and the network. Does the same case apply elsewhere (UK,

Hi all, Last night I went to replace an Asterisk 1.4 + mISDN + b410p box with Asterisk 1.6.2 and DAHDI BRI - to no avail. I had two servers so copied network setting etc from the working one, moved the card across, ran dahdi_genconf etc and it didn't work. Here's the console output with notices disabled: lucas*CLI> pri intense debug span 1 Enabled debugging on span 1 [Dec 16

Hi all, As i tested with Asterisk+dahdi+libpri with openvox BRI with NT mode, the ISDN phone does not work. There is the setting and error. ***********************Enviroment***************************** Asterisk-1.6.1.18 dahdi-linux-2.3.0.1 dahdi-tool-2.30. libpri-1.4.11.2 CentOS-5.5 OpenVox B400P ****************************************************************** In my case , I set prot 1 and

Hi, My setup is: IPPhone1 --- Asterisk1 with B410P ---- Patton 4638 --- Asterisk2 --- IPPhone2 I want to evaluate Asterisk1 in TE/PtmP mode. So, Patton box is configured in NT/PtmP (with 3 BRI links between both systems). Anyway, asterisk -rx "pri show spans" keeps replying : PRI span 1/0: Provisioned, Down, Active PRI span 2/0: Provisioned, Down, Active PRI span 3/0: Provisioned,

connecting legacy PBX to Asterisk (for the very same reason, those PBX use TE-PTMP). If others could join this thread and say if they agree or not with NT-PTMP being the 2nd most needed mode, would be great. Please, do not hesitate to comment. > > > Right now, I would not preclude the possibility that NT-PTMP support > might be added, but I could not give you a concrete time at which

Hi, I'm facing an issue with which loading wctdm24xxp module fails. Here is relevant dmesg's output : [ 13.455729] dahdi: Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 [ 13.455729] dahdi: Version: 2.4.0 [ 13.510847] ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:01:0b.0[A] -> GSI 22 (level, low) -> IRQ 22 [ 15.527788] wctdm24xxp 0000:01:0b.0: Timeout waiting for receive frame. [ 17.527787]

Hi, I would appreciate some advice on the following: how does one use a single BRI port HFC chipset based ISDN cards with the latest DAHDI, libpri and Asterisk 1.8? For Asterisk 1.4 I would first install mISDN & mISDNuser and then build Asterisk 1.4. Now I noticed that Digium's HFC chipset based B410P is supported by the latest DAHDI & libpri but reading the source of the

Hi, Reading http://www.asteriskguru.com/tutorials/bri.html , it seems PtP is the way to connect businesses but if you read http://public.swbell.net/ISDN/connect.html you would think the opposite. Can anyone elaborate a bit PtP or PtmP respective advantages ? Cheers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

2011/6/15 A J Stiles <asterisk_list at earthshod.co.uk> > On Wednesday 15 Jun 2011, Olivier wrote: > > At the moment, my console is full with messages such as : > > [Jun 15 09:06:25] WARNING[2140]: chan_dahdi.c:3369 pri_find_dchan: No > > D-channels available! Using Primary channel 9 as D-channel anyway! > > [Jun 15 09:06:25] WARNING[2141]: chan_dahdi.c:3369

2012/1/10, Olivier <oza_4h07 at yahoo.fr>: > Hi, > > 1. This patch didn't correct the issue but I'm far from certain that I > correctly applied the patch. I was right to suspect I was wrong : now, after correctly applying the DAHLIN-275 patch, it's working OK (with the EchoCan module plugged-in). Thanks for your lighting fast correction !! > 2. I took the

Hello everybody, I try to install -Ubuntu 8.04 server- a B410P and a TDM2400P together with Asterisk 1.4.26-2, dahdi-linux-2.2.0.2 and dahdi-tools-2.2.0. Problem I face is the following one: CLI> module load chan_dahdi.so == Registered application 'DAHDISendKeypadFacility' == Registered application 'ZapSendKeypadFacility' == Parsing