similar to: Question regarding progressinband

I don't expect my SIP provider to provide useful "Remote-Party-ID" information. Therefore, I am using "CONNECTEDLINE(num)=xxx" AND "CONNECTEDLINE(name)=yyy" to populate remote party information from a local database. I am also using the "I" (upper case "i") option for Dial. Generally I like to see to see the remote party name appear on the

I have progressinband=yes in sip.conf, but Asterisk sends a 180-Ringing to my polycom phones and then it also sends 183-Session Progress. That doesn't seem to make sense. Shouldn't Asterisk NOT send 180-Ringing if progressinband=yes ? Doug.

Hi All, We have a Cisco CME linked to our Asterisk PBX (named 'epstein'). Off said PBX we have numerous other PBX's, some IAX and some SIP. On a call placed from CME (SIP) to 'epstein' it all works fine except for a few quirks. When calling through epstein to an IAX peer we get '100 trying' followed by '180 ringing' sent back down the SIP leg to CME.

I have this in sip.conf: [general] context=default allowoverlap=no bindport=5060 bindaddr=0.0.0.0 srvlookup=yes progressinband=yes [19256002182] type=friend username=19256002182 callerid="Test hone 1" <+19256002182> host=dynamic canreinvite=no secret=password context=test disallow=all allow=g729 [level3] type=peer host=xxx.yyy.16.99 context=default

I have a box (Genband) expecting the following: 100 trying 180 ringing with SDP Or 100 trying 183 with SDP And asterisk is sending: 100 trying 180 ringing 183 with SDP Any way to modify asterisk to send what he is expecting? Thanks, Dave -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi everyone, We have an Asterisk 1.4.17 user who has problems with sometimes not getting a ring tone on the calling phone. We're considering setting progressinband = yes, but would like to know how much extra CPU load this will require? If anyone can give something even roughly specific (eg "30% increase") that would be great, rather than just "lots". Also, are there any

Chris Abel writes: >Hello everyone! > >I've had this problem for a while and cant figure it out. When an outside >caller calls an extension on my asterisk system, they do not hear any >sort of ringing. Inside extensions calling other extensions do hear >ringing. We have 3 other asterisk systems that are configured the same >way, but do not have this problem. We think it

Asterisk 1.4 We are experiencing an issue on transfers where no progress tones are heard by the caller: 1. Call from 1593 (SPA525G 0026998D2FFFF) to 1595 (SPA922 000B820AFFFFF). 1595 answers 2. From 1593 initiate transfer to 1597 (SPA508G 1CDF0F4AFFFF). 1595 hears MoH. 3. 1597 starts ringing and 1593 presses transfer again. MoH stops but 1595 hears no ringing When xfer is pressed and the

Hello! An extension registered at asterisk 13.23 initiates an external call (pjsip). After the Invite, the callee (-> ISP) sends a 100 Trying 183 Session Progress (*without* SDP) Asterisk now sends to the extension: 183 Session Progress (*with* SDP) 183 Session Progress (*with* SDP) (really two times) The callee meanwhile sends 180 Ringing (*without* SDP) which is

Any ideas on why callers who call into my customer's SIP trunk are not hearing a ringback tone? I had this on one other asterisk system, and wound up needing to set progressinband=yes in the SIP trunk config. I have set this on the current system & restarted asterisk, but to no avail. I am using: AsteriskNOW distro Asterisk build is 1.6 from AsteriskNOW repository:

Andrew, I don't think it's a Polycom issue. We took Asterisk out of the picture and had our Polycom phones communicate directly with an Audiocodes PSTN gateway. Unlike Asterisk, the audiocodes do not send 180 Ringing before sending 183 Session Progress, and the polycom's play the correct tones in this case. We WANT Asterisk to send progress tones in band. In our case it IS needed.

Hello everyone! I've had this problem for a while and cant figure it out. When an outside caller calls an extension on my asterisk system, they do not hear any sort of ringing. Inside extensions calling other extensions do hear ringing. We have 3 other asterisk systems that are configured the same way, but do not have this problem. We think it has something to do with asterisk 1.6. The other

On 2003-04-08 at 09:42, Mark Spencer wrote: > > So audio should probably be cut through as soon as dialing is finished. > > We do pass audio through whenever we get 183 Session Progress (or even > without it). However, in at least one users tests, interfacing with Cisco > equipment, the Cisco is sending to the wrong port number (not the one we > specified in our SDP) so

Whoops, email client auto-filled dev previously. Let's try this again. Michael Maier wrote: <snip> > Ok - but this doesn't seem to answer my main question: > > Why must > > progressinband=never > > be applied especially if asterisk uses it by default? The big difference > between w/ and w/o it is: The default in 13 is "no" which still

Dear Asterisk community! I am having trouble with a project concerning the 183 Session Progress SIP messages. Asterisk seems to only accept these when there is also a Session Description (SDP) included in the message. I also verified this by looking at the code. However for a project we are working with a trunk to a third party system (Alcatel) and they are insisting that this behavior is

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- Nov 21 14:17:47 VERBOSE[32580] logger.c: <-- SIP read from 172.25.103.222:5060: INVITE sip:1715;phone-context=exp_net.ascom@ascom.be:5060;maddr=172.25.96.48;transport=udp;user=phone;x-nt-redirect=redirect-server SIP/2.0 From:

Hello, I have a problem with the following: When I dial a PSTN number from a UAC, the call is made through a SIP Trunk (which has a connection to the PSTN) in Asterisk. The PSTN Gateway returns a 180 Ringing WITH SDP, but Asterisk forwards the 100 Ringing WITHOUT SDP: As you can see below, the SIP message from 10.254.254.1 (the PSTN Gateway) has SDP, while * (with 192.168.0.173) removes the SDP

On 12.12.18 at 19:43 Joshua C. Colp wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, at 12:31 PM, Michael Maier wrote: > > <snip> > >> >> The problem: The extension doesn't create a ringback locally, because >> it most probably expects it to >> be sent by the callee - but the callee doesn't send anything (not >> surprising, because there has been >>

Hi all, I have been asked to look into using asterisk as part of our setup. The eventual goal is to replace as many parts of the existing setup as possible, but in the interim, I just have to make it bolt on and work with all existing parts. My current setup is as follows: Cisco 7940 (ext 2000) | v Asterisk -> Snom SIP proxy(v2.22) -> Vega100 PSTN gw -> Index PBX |

[Resent due to non-descriptive subject line.] Hi folks When connecting two SIP users, is there any way to stop Asterisk from sending SIP 183 Session Progress messages, either globally or per-peer? Scenario as follows: Call from UA1 to Asterisk (UA2) to UA3. UA3 sends RTP before SIP OK to Asterisk (UA2). Asterisk (UA2) detects early audio from UA3 and sends 183 Session Progress with SDP to