similar to: SIP per-call heartbeat?

I've just been trying to do a "yum update" on a Centos 4.6 system, and one of the packages it wants to upgrade is heartbeat-ldirectord from 2.1.2-3 to 2.1.3-2 However, the newer version has dependency problems that can't be resolved: [root at miton2 ~]# yum update Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Loading "protectbase" plugin Setting up Update Process Setting

Hi, I'm trying to diagnose a particularly elusive problem, and am wondering if anyone else here has seen anything similar and can offer any ideas. I have a conference bridge running Asterisk 1.2.32 (with slight mods), in a colo talking via a LAN to an ITSP using SIP/RTP. It is dedicated to a single customer. On several occasions over the last few months, the customer has reported instances

Most of my experience until recently has been in Asterisk 1.2, and I am just starting to make use of Asterisk 11 for new systems. I have a question about using SIP on a multi-homed machine. I have a customer who wants an Asterisk box with two network interfaces: one on the public Internet (no NAT), and one on a private LAN. The box will not do any IP forwarding between interfaces. They want to

In article <mfbt6f$9rt$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > I am trying to debug a SIP issue, between an Asterisk 1.2.32 system that > is behind a network device to which I don't have ready access, which is > performing NAT with possibly some kind of SIP ALG, and an Asterisk 11 > system on a public IP. > > My question is

I am trying to debug a SIP issue, between an Asterisk 1.2.32 system that is behind a network device to which I don't have ready access, which is performing NAT with possibly some kind of SIP ALG, and an Asterisk 11 system on a public IP. My question is very specific, and I don't need right now to discuss the ins and outs of the above setup. What I am seeing is that when I have set up a

Hello list, I am confronted with the following problem : making a call only leasts for about 30 seconds, then the call is ended. The CLI shows : [May 21 14:31:50] WARNING[25345]: chan_sip.c:1980 retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on transmission 954539948-5060-2 at 192.168.1.100 for seqno 11 (Critical Response) -- See doc/sip-retransmit.txt. [May 21 14:31:50] WARNING[25345]:

In article <n009u2$85v$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > Apologies, this is slightly off-topic being to do with an EPEL package, > although it's running on CentOS6, so I thought others here might have come > across this issue. > > I have five CentOS 6 systems running fail2ban from EPEL, and this > package was updated

Has anyone else experienced a problem with the LED for span 1 on a TE410P or TE405P? I had a TE410P on which the span 1 LED would not light red, but once the span was connected, it did correctly light green. I RMAed the board to our UK distrbutor and received a replacement. However, the replacement board displayed the same problem! Wondering if it was related to the computer I was putting it

In article <20151125133008.6369360.14455.17239 at gmail.com>, Israel Gottlieb <isrlgb at gmail.com> wrote: > Try putting progress instead of answer Yes, I tried Progress already, and it didn't help. But thanks for the suggestion! Tony > I have a puzzling situation, and would be grateful for any insight. > > I have a dialplan that forwards an incoming call out to

In article <ml1jnh$afr$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > When I started using CentOS 6 instead of CentOS 5, I discovered that > "less" no longer understood \< and \>, which I had been used to using > since almost forever. > > Eventually research revealed that in the Fedora version on which > RHEL 6 was

In article <CAG2kNCyjsQZ2qW_8BBLp8BH_20=JgxoEYpn9BSwZhXg7_rHBbg at mail.gmail.com>, Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> > wrote: > > > I am just applying the latest C6 updates to a couple of KVM Linodes. > > It appears that the latest update of util-linux-ng has

worked came to one ring only now. Thank you very much. If I use TE410 or TE405 instead of X100P. do it make that first ring disappear? Shakil -----Original Message----- From: tony@softins.clara.co.uk [mailto:tony@softins.clara.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 12:27 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Auto Answering PSTN --> Asterisk using X100PCard In

In article <301a2e78-d490-3805-e30f-41b668aac5c1 at sysnux.pf>, Jean-Denis Girard <jd.girard at sysnux.pf> wrote: > > Hi Tony, > > Le 20/07/2019 à 06:29, Tony Mountifield a écrit : > > Are there any other languages/libraries I should be considering? > > Same here, after years of AGI / AMI, I recently made my first project > using ARI on Asterisk-16. I love

Thanks for the suggestion Tony, I installed each codec for MoH, core sounds, and extra sound packages. Unfortunately the tests produce the same results. [Sep 1 20:36:45] ERROR[10081][C-00007fe5]: frame.c:343 ast_frdup: FRACK!, Failed assertion Excessive refcount 100000 reached on ao2 object 0x20380b0 ( continuously for a while followed by a [Sep 1 20:36:46] WARNING[7761][C-0000770d]:

I've just been doing some tests using the manager API to originate an outgoing call via a X100P and connect the call to an extension: Action: Originate Channel: Zap/1/01234567890 Context: local-extensions Exten: 6000 Priority: 1 I've noticed that extension is getting called as soon as the outgoing call has been placed, rather than when it is answered. Is the X100P capable of detecting

Ok, that sounds a little more elegant. Does that delete switch delete those files after download, or does it stop it from downloading at all? On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > In article <CANZsmmM6C_F+NuPdjd+mGDEXaJVcfc1bdhpWdESSbC2CR7Dz3 > g at mail.gmail.com>, > Felipe Westfields <felipe.westfields at gmail.com>

@tonymountifield Does this still hold true? https://superuser.com/a/1075837 On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 7:21 AM Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > In article <E02FA554-9D6D-4E7D-8A78-5FBDE1DE939D at kicp.uchicago.edu>, > Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sep 26, 2020, at 8:05 AM, Jerry Geis

I want to use fail2ban on CentOS 6 to monitor Apache with the standard default logfile format ("combined"). Has anyone here succeeded in doing so? The format has the IP at the start of the line, followed by two dashes (if no authentication) and THEN the timestamp. What I've read on the fail2ban wiki seems to say that the timestamp must ALWAYS be at the start of the line, followed by

In article <55D20981.7030902 at centos.org>, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 08/17/2015 10:57 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: > > I recently applied updates to a CentOS 5 box running MySQL. I've discovered > > that the new version of openssl, 0.9.8e-36.0.1.el5_11, breaks MySQL SSL > > connections. > > > > If I rename

Has anyone here done any work on clustering Meetme conferences over multiple Asterisk boxes? The scenario I am thinking of is where there are two or more boxes connected to a set of PRIs that all answer to the same PSTN number, and where it's not possible to know in advance on which box a call would arrive. So it would be possible to have some calls on one box and some on another, that should