similar to: Different IP addresss for SIP and RTP

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "Different IP addresss for SIP and RTP"

2011 Apr 12
2
[LLVMdev] gcroot + `section not found for addresss ...' ???
On Apr 11, 2011, at 11:27 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Bill, > >> However, there isn't a personality function associated here. This conflicts with the fact that there's an LSDA associated with the function. It's not really feasible that there would be an LSDA but no personality function. > > GCC recently added support for this, i.e. a situation in which there are
2011 Apr 12
0
[LLVMdev] gcroot + `section not found for addresss ...' ???
Hi Bill, > If it's a matter of defaulting to the C personality function, then that should be a fairly easy change to make. I'll look into it, though it may take a backseat to other things that I have to do right now unless someone else wants to. I'll add this to the list of exception handling problems: it should be possible to write this level of simple eh code without a selector,
2011 Apr 12
0
[LLVMdev] gcroot + `section not found for addresss ...' ???
Hi Bill, > However, there isn't a personality function associated here. This conflicts with the fact that there's an LSDA associated with the function. It's not really feasible that there would be an LSDA but no personality function. GCC recently added support for this, i.e. a situation in which there are only cleanups to be run: it uses the C personality function even if the
2011 Apr 11
0
[LLVMdev] gcroot + `section not found for addresss ...' ???
The linker is going off in the weeds trying to parse the dwarf unwind info. The CIE has: Leh_frame_common_begin0: .long 0 ## CIE Identifier Tag .byte 1 ## DW_CIE_VERSION .asciz "zLR" ## CIE Augmentation .byte 1 ## CIE Code Alignment Factor .byte 120 ## CIE Data Alignment
2011 Apr 10
2
[LLVMdev] gcroot + `section not found for addresss ...' ???
Hi, If I type define i32 @main() gc "shadow-stack" { entry: %0 = alloca i8* %1 = call i8* @malloc(i64 1) store i8* %1, i8** %0 call void @llvm.gcroot(i8** %0, i8* null) ret i32 0 } declare i8* @malloc(i64) declare void @llvm.gcroot(i8**, i8*) nounwind in test.ll and then do > llc test.ll > gcc test.s I get the error ld: in
2011 Apr 12
2
[LLVMdev] gcroot + `section not found for addresss ...' ???
This is an interesting problem. The GC code is being converted into 'invokes' instead of calls: define i32 @main() gc "shadow-stack" { entry: %gc_frame = alloca %gc_stackentry.main %gc_currhead = load %gc_stackentry** @llvm_gc_root_chain %gc_frame.map = getelementptr %gc_stackentry.main* %gc_frame, i32 0, i32 0, i32 1 store %gc_map* getelementptr inbounds (%gc_map.0*
2008 Oct 22
3
asterisk video
hi, hs anyone able to make video to work on asterisk? i tried following this: http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+phone+xten+eyeBeam i can see that eyebeam is trying to broadcast a video but the other eyebeam is not receiving it. i tested the same setup but this time using ser with rtpproxy and eyebeam video works fine. any ideas? where do you think should i start
2016 Feb 18
2
Asterisk behind RTPproxy | On-Demand SDP engagement
Hi All, I've been wondering if I can instruct asterisk in the dialplan to engage the Media handling for a particular call or not. I've SIP users behind Kamailio & RTPProxy, and I can make use of sip.conf setting "directmediadeny|directmediapermit" to offload media from asterisk for peer-to-peer calls BUT what if someone wants to record a call or engage some feature-code ?
2007 Sep 28
3
Time went backwards in domU after migration
Hello gurus, I have two physical xen hosts and when I migrate a domU from one host to another, I get many of this error from domU kernel: clocksource/0: Time went backwards: delta=-3536123661 shadow=686019823475 offset=281887188 Sometimes domU time stalls and network stops working, but other times it gets working again. The two hosts are using different platform timer source:
2018 Mar 22
2
Broken relocation for generating offsets?
Hello, I append another clue I found out: The problem is definitely not caused by "__ImageBase" the problem comes with the "OFFSET". I generated another object file which crashed. The commonality: mov edx, DWORD PTR ?normalPlanschbecken@@3HA ; normalPlanschbecken lea rcx, OFFSET FLAT :??_C at _0CC@LCMJAIPO at Reading?5?$CCnormalPlanschbecken?$CC?5?$CFi@
2011 Sep 20
5
[Bug 8471] New: The file of DBCS file name contains DBCS second byte of x'5C' cause error.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8471 Summary: The file of DBCS file name contains DBCS second byte of x'5C' cause error. Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at
2016 Apr 26
3
Can't access by NetBIOS Aliases or IP Address
Hi all. I am running Debian jessie server with Samba, which has joined the Active Directory domain. The domain controllers are Windows Server 2012 R2. After I upgraded Samba version from 4.1.17+dfsg-2+deb8u2 to 4.2.10+dfsg-0+deb8u2, I'm facing the problem that I can't access Samba share by NetBIOS Aliases or IP Address. The Samba's NetBIOS name is mysamba, and I can access by
2007 Jun 02
7
u32 classifier
Hi folks...!!! I´ve a problem that i did not solve it. i want to limit the DOWNLOAD to my hosts (upstream traffic for the firewall) using IMQ, If i classify by PORT (source or destination) all seems to be fine, but...BUT...if i want to restrict by IP addresss (internal IP address) i can´t do it, because my hosts go to Internet toward the firewall using NAT, so after NAT my IP address in
2009 Jul 27
2
Asterisk and Kamailio NAT problem
Hello Im using Asterisk as a SIP client of Kamailio with RTPproxy. Asterisk is behind NAT. X-Lite and SNOM phones behind NAT work fine. But when I try to connect with an Asterisk behind NAT, the Asterisk client doesn't receive sound. I already tried in 2 different NATs, with no firewalls. This is my Asterisk config: [kamailio] type=peer host=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx disallow=all allow=ulaw
2018 Mar 22
0
Broken relocation for generating offsets?
I wouldn't be surprised if JITing COFF files on Windows doesn't work so well, since the object file format assumes most symbols are dllimport or within the local 2GB module address range. I'm not familiar with the current JIT state of the art, though. On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 1:45 AM via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I append another clue I
2017 May 12
3
JIT - Resolve obj file without a main
Hello Lang, I noticed, if I load a obj-File without a main-function, the Jitter won't resolve any address. But if I have a main, everything works fine. Why is this so? Is there a way to stop this? Kind regards Björn Als GmbH eingetragen im Handelsregister Bad Homburg v.d.H. HRB 9816, USt.ID-Nr. DE 114 165 789 Geschäftsführer: Hiroshi Kawamura, Dr Hiroshi Nakamura, Markus Bode, Heiko
2019 Jun 28
2
JIT crashing when compiling source code with Clang and -mretpoline flag
Heyho both Mailinglists, I'm not sure if I encountered a bug or if I'm doing something wrong. I compiled a "Hello World"-function with Clang to LLVM-IR code, while passing the "-mretpoline" flag. I tried jitting and calling that function with the KaleidoscopeJIT code, but when calling "lookup" for that function the application crashed. I also tried that file
2007 May 11
1
Need a RTP/SIP Proxy to be used as SBC (Session Border Controller)
Hi all, I have been using asterisk to do such kind of thing, But I must admitt, this is not 100 % conveniant (Mainly because Asterisk isn't a SIP Proxy). I just wanted to know if you knew/used some kind of SBC or packages which would deal both with SIP AND RTP ! SER/OpenSER woulc be a good SIP Proxy ... but then how to deal with RTP ? Any tip, info greatly welcome ! Thanks, JM
2018 Dec 13
2
Setting a function in a module to extern
But in my module this function already exist… I first want to delete it but without also deleting the calls to it… From: Boldizsar.Palotas at esa.int <Boldizsar.Palotas at esa.int> Sent: Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2018 10:53 To: Gaier, Bjoern <Bjoern.Gaier at horiba.com> Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Setting a function in a
2009 Mar 05
2
Cisco IP Communicator with Asterisk/Trixbox
Hi guys, Has anyone had any luck with getting the Cisco IP Communicator working with your Asterisk or primarily, Trixbox installation? I've tried searching the net for information, and found someone said to set it up like the 7970 hard phone, which I have, and I'm just running into the problems with it saying "Error Verifying Config Info". Any and all help is appreciated.