similar to: Cisco 7940 phone and tftpd provisioning - for ever?

For anyone who is interested, I have a working tftpd (modified wvtftpd) capable of serving configuration, dialplans, and ringtones to Cisco 7960/7940 and ATA-186 devices that are located behind NAT firewalls. As TFTP is not a very firewall/NAT friendly protocol, I had to break some rules to get it to work with these cisco devices. It might cause problems for other TFTP clients, but it works with

Hi, I have been running TFTPD server for 3 weeks and performed about 100 deployments. After that, TFTPD started throwing the follwing errotrs in /var/log/messages Aug 20 21:52:55 RTP-OSP-Server tftpd[7146]: warning: cannot open /etc/hosts.allow: Too many open files Aug 20 21:52:55 RTP-OSP-Server tftpd[7146]: warning: cannot open /etc/hosts.deny: Too many open files Aug 20 21:52:55 RTP-OSP-Server

Hi, I have a question on tftpd on Slackware - I know this is an embedded Linux forum, but I think it still must be the appropriate place to ask. I have hpa-tftpd V0.40 on Slackware 9.1. No matter what I do, I can't get files transferred to the tftp server. I just get timeouts - no messages in /var/log/messages or in /var/log/syslog - just dealthly silence. This is the configuration line

I configure the system of remote boot. Almost all was done. But one simple problem. tftp doesn't download pxelinux.0 from boot-server, in.tftpd is running at. Problem isn't in pxelinux.0, but in protocol itself. I've created test file "test" in /tftpboot and tried to download it but "Timeout occured". From /var/log/messages: Mar 27 16:32:27 dk in.tftpd[26576]:

Hi! I am using OpenBSD 4.4 with the build-in TFTP-Daemon for PXE. Distributing OpenBSD works fine. Now I want to distribute OpenBSD and WinPE. I've installed PXELinux 3.72 and configured it. Works also fine for PXELinux and distributing OpenBSD. To distribute WinPE I need a remap rule (\ -> /) for the TFTP-Daemon. I've created a file /etc/tftpd.remap with the following rule: rgG \\ /

AI_CANONNAME is only relevant when the resulting official name is used, which is not the case in tftpd for the address to bind to. Also AI_ADDRCONFIG isn't helpful. This flag is good for sockets used to connect(2) somewhere. But for listening sockets it makes tftpd fail to start when -a 0.0.0.0:69 is passed and no network device is up yet. This addresses Debian bug

> Correct. Like most UDP-based inetd services, tftpd is intended to be run in 'wait' mode. When the first request arrives, inetd starts the service but does not read the incoming packet (it can't, because it has no way to pass it along to the server). After that, inetd ignores that socket until the server exits. This isn't critical for tftp, but it does help to keep down the

Hello, we have two diskless machines in a routed network. Both get their IP adresse and tftp configuration via dhcp. When we start one machine all works well, when the second machine tries to download the kernel via tftp we get this error: Jul 8 09:49:52 voyager2 in.tftpd[8374]: RRQ from 10.63.5.122 filename /andreas/pxelinux.0 Jul 8 09:49:53 voyager2 in.tftpd[8374]: tftpd: read: Connection

Hello, Peter and others! there are some issues regarding the tftp-hpa server: 1. Running as Windows service seems to require that the application does not detach (otherwise "net start" says smth. like "could not start, the service didn't report any errors"). The attached patch adds the option "-n", which can be used to have tftpd run in foreground.

Hi, I don't understand why a SIP hardphone can't provision itself using tftp. I'm very suspicious about my tftp daemon but I lack basic knowledge of Linux CLI to pinpoint what's going wrong and separate what belongs to SIP phone configuration from what comes from tftp server. What I would like to do is to add a given file in current /srv/tftp directory and test by hand that tftpd

Hopefully I'm not out to lunch here. I ported tftp-hpa to our proprietary OS, VOS (at stratus.com). We've always runs the old legacy tftpd from inetd, so I wanted to continue doing so with tftp-hpa. It seems to work okay, but I noticed that the code in tftpd.c has a 'while (1)' loop that has this at the end: /* * Now that we have read the request packet from

I''ve been poking around my system, and realized that having a tftp server would be handy. (I''m working with cisco routers, which have the capability to up and download configuration images via tftp.) However, I''m not content with the usual tftpd that comes with Linux. The whole "specify each directory you want" scheme is cock-eyed to me. I''d prefer

Hi In the pxelinux page, is referred that the tftpd server from http://tftpd32.jounin.net as working with pxelinux. However, from the tests I've made, it seems that the 'tsize' option is not supported. Anyone has knowledge of a working TFTPD server that runs on Windows NT4? p.s. it can be shareware, I just want to test it with NT4, I have had success with the 'builtin'

Hi, I've been struggling with this problem for the last couple of hours and am nowhere near solving the problem. I am trying to run a tftp server in a chroot jail. Now perhaps I am being paranoid, but I would like to have it launched from within its own jail even if it supposedly does a chroot itself and runs with a parameterizable user. I downloaded the atftp-server package and tried

Why tftpd doesn't support request from clients trying to tftp to the broadcast address? Will this feature ever appear in tftpd? Or is there any workaround for serving broadcast requests? Radek

I've got in.tftpd configured on a Fedora Linux server. The service is configured to boot printersm and sun sparcs. The printers boot fine, but there's a problem with the sparcs. When the sparc sends an initial request for a file, in.tftpd forks a process to handle it. If I do a "netstat -pan | grep tftp" I see that this forked process is listening on local address

Take 2 at bouncing this to the rest of the original recipients through a different MTA, since mail.zytor.com refused to accept it the first time. Please re-add Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at obsidianresearch.com> and 793921 at bugs.debian.org to the CC for replies. On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:34:00PM +0930, Ron wrote: > > Hi Jason, > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 03:45:30PM -0600, Jason

Hi I'm working on an update of the openbsd tftpd, mainly to support RFC 2349 (tsize option; and 2347-2348 too). In fact, i backport from tftp-hpa (which came from an old openbsd cvs). I know, i can use tftp-hpa but first it doesn't compile on openbsd, second, i hope the backport could be include in openbsd cvs ... does someone know a tftp client or a test to really know what is good or

Hello, On my previous TFTP server I had logging. I did see all requests in logfiles. On my current TFTP server I have also added the options '-v -v -v', but nog logging. At least I can't find it them in /var/log/*/* Where does tftpd-hpa writes it's logging? Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven

It seems that tftpd-hpa is more suitable at serving arbitrarily large files (greater than 65535 blocks long; with pxelinux.0 using a default block size of 1408 this is 92,273,280 bytes) as atftpd will complain in the log stating "Requested file to big, increase BLKSIZE". I saw that a while back HPA mentioned that atftpd was probably more scalable (number of clients) while tftpd-hpa is