similar to: No subject

Polycom Phones (updated for 3.2.X firmware with asterisk 1.6.1 Jan/2010) With SIP 3.2.X firmware (available on the Polycom download site) and Asterisk 1.6.1, Polycom phones now support a full featured BLF showing statuses of Ringing, Inuse and Online and one touch directed call pickup. On the asterisk side all that needs to be done is to add a hint to the extension and enable directed pickup.

Struggling with an IP650 and 7 IP335s this morning. I have the following hints defined (courtesy of FreePBX 2.9): extensions_additional.conf:exten => 300,hint,SIP/300 extensions_additional.conf:exten => 301,hint,SIP/301 extensions_additional.conf:exten => 302,hint,SIP/302 extensions_additional.conf:exten => 303,hint,SIP/303 extensions_additional.conf:exten => 304,hint,SIP/304

What does the (T) mean? Am playing around with running an IAX trunk over an OpenVPN session and see this only on this peer. demopbx/sunfone 10.222.0.6 (D) 255.255.255.255 4569 (T) OK (26 ms) Same thing on the other side: sunfone/demopbx 10.222.0.1 (S) 255.255.255.255 4569 (T) OK (31 ms) Cheers, j

do you have selinux enabled? It should not be. p p.s. - if it comes to re-installing, you can backup all your settings with the freepbx backup utility and then restore so that you don't have to re-enter everything. From: "Lachek Butalek" <lachek@gmail.com> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Date:

Figuring I knew what I was doing (I didn't - surprise) I added a totally unnecessary line in /etc/asterisk/extensions_additional.conf a couple of days ago. Troubleshooting a dialing rule issue, I'm now realizing that FreePBX is updating its database with the new settings but is not rewriting/updating extensions_additional.conf with the changes I'm making. I've tried renaming the

This patch cleans up some 80-odd warnings I was seeing when compiling the xenpci driver, all completely trivial. It also replaces the use of asm for calling cpuid with the __cpuid compiler intrinsic, and modifies calling code accordingly. I''m pretty sure my mailer going to mangle the inline patch (below) so I''m attaching the pristine version. (will try to fix for next time) --

Hello- I have a low traffic AAH setup, a few hardphones, a few softphones, 50 calls per day max. I used the AMP Digital Receptionist to make a simple voice menu: "Thank you for calling xxxx". I did this for both Normal times and After Hours times. It worked fine. I then went to the AMP Maintenance window, Config Edit, got the "phpconfig for Asterisk PBX" page, and selected

[0004f2xxxxxx](poly650) defaultuser=0004f2xxxxxx callerid="Front Desk" <1600> mailbox=1600 *setvar=callidnum=1234561600* and from extensions.conf: [outgoing] ; Outbound unrestricted domestic calls exten => _1NXXXXXXXXX,1,Verbose(Outbound call from ${callidnum} to ${EXTEN} on ${STRFTIME(${EPOCH},,%D)} at ${STRFTIME(${EPOCH},,%T)}.) *exten =>

On 10/29/2017 03:12 PM, H wrote: > On 10/29/2017 03:49 PM, Frank Cox wrote: >> On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 15:03:49 -0400 >> H wrote: >> >>> I had three characters I was not able to translate and after much >>> hair-pulling realized to my surprise that they may be incorrectly drawn in >>> Centos 7. >> My first guess would be a faulty characters in

asterisk 1.4.35 dahdi 2.3.0.1+2.3.0 one span on a 4port T1 card Got complaints this morning that outbound and inbound calls were "scratchy" and I made a few test calls. It kind of sounds like the gain is too high somewhere, and the audio is overdriven. Is this a problem at the carrier? I'm trying to call them now, but it's Sunday morning in the sticks, and my chances of

Folks, First off, this is messy, and I hope someone will be kind enough to help me clean this up (the part added to extensions_additional.conf). You've been warned! For those of your using AMP or A@H, there has been a lot of talk about how to route incoming calls to different places based on which trunk is ringing. The standard answer is that you can only do this by using DIDs,

Hi All After lots of try I was successfull in connecting to PSTN to make and recevice calls , I used AMP for this purpose , now I wanted to try out this Asterisk server answers the call , ask for the extensions and then after the extension entered the call is forwarded /transfered to the extension no , I use Asterisk 1.2.4, configured using AMP , on RHEL3 I did some configuration for my

On 01/23/2016 06:20 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: > Sometimes the direction of UI development in gnome really angers me. > I'll have to be one who has to say that I really am not bothered by GNOME 3. It is better out of the box than GNOME 2 ever was, at least in my opinion, especially that abomination called Nautilus spatial mode. It is a bit irritating that things are either really easy

<font face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" size="2"> <span><div>Hi,<br>There was a mention of optimizing away C++ dynamic_casts in LTO in this presentation: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fd3afoM3UOE&t=1306" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fd3afoM3UOE&t=1306</a><br>I

Howdy, I am playing around with asterisk within an LXC container on Ubuntu 11.04. I have asterisk (1.4.42) running fine, but want access to dahdi_dummy for timing (meetme). I have dahdi installed on the "host", and dahdi_dummy is loaded: root at astnorth:/# ls -ltr /dev/dahdi total 0 crw-rw---- 1 root root 196, 250 2011-06-08 13:59 transcode crw-rw---- 1 root root 196, 253

On 01/25/2016 09:07 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 03:20:35PM -0800, Alice Wonder wrote: >> It's a fricken text editor, that should be the default - meaning you >> have to do something special to get fonts shown that aren't >> monospace. > > The default _is_ monospace (specifically, the monospace system font). Yes and I needed a larger font

On Jan 24, 2016, at 4:47 AM, John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: > > You can start > applications, move windows around, and manage files. What do people really > want from a DE? Given a choice between Helix GNOME [*] and GNOME 3, I?ll certainly pick Gnome 3. However, it is also a fact that GNOME has some longstanding design misfeatures that should have been fixed

On 10/29/2017 03:49 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 15:03:49 -0400 > H wrote: > >> I had three characters I was not able to translate and after much >> hair-pulling realized to my surprise that they may be incorrectly drawn in >> Centos 7. > My first guess would be a faulty characters in whatever font you're using. > > Compare it with a working

> The use of? monospace fonts > is an expectation for reading Markdown. > Really, it's the whole point. um... no. going way back to "triumph of the nerds", the number-one example steve jobs used to symbolize the absence of any esthetics at microsoft (and thus -- by extension -- inside the head of bill gates) was the fact they found a monospaced font acceptable.