similar to: core show channels consise in asterisk 1.8.3

I'm seeing this: 1 UID FETCH 31734 (ENVELOPE) * 23 FETCH (UID 31734 ENVELOPE ("Fri, 2 Mar 2012 19:05:24 -0500 (EST)" "XXXXXX" (({22} XXXXX \"X-XX\" XXXXXX NIL "XXXXXXX" "XXXXXXXXX.XXX")) (({22} XXXXX \"X-XX\" XXXXXX NIL "XXXXXXX" "XXXXXXXXX.XXXXXX.XXX")) ((NIL NIL "XXXXXXX"

On 14/06/16 15:36, Juan Ignacio wrote: > I go to answer all, here I go. > > Have you given your users a uidNumber attribute ? > > Not all, but im set it in my user and not work. > > Have you given 'Domain Users' (at least) a gidNumber attribute ? > > Not all, but im set it in my user and not work. > > If you have done the above, have you run 'net cache

Hello guys. When checking the Samba status, an error is displayed. This error was displayed after upgrading from version 4.7.5 to version 4.7.7 I've reviewed everything and found nothing wrong. Anyone have any idea what it is? *Mai 14 08:54:47 XXXXXX.XXXXXX.COM <http://XXXXXX.XXXXXX.COM> samba[14480]: [2018/05/14 08:54:47.676288, 0]

On June 5, 2011, we migrated from Mantis to Jira as the issue tracker for Asterisk [1]. We temporarily left Mantis running in read-only mode to smooth the transition. At 15 months, temporary has turned into semi-permanent. As a part of other infrastructure changes we are making to the community services, we will finally shut down Mantis for good. We will update our DNS servers on the morning of

On June 5, 2011, we migrated from Mantis to Jira as the issue tracker for Asterisk [1]. We temporarily left Mantis running in read-only mode to smooth the transition. At 15 months, temporary has turned into semi-permanent. As a part of other infrastructure changes we are making to the community services, we will finally shut down Mantis for good. We will update our DNS servers on the morning of

On 14/06/16 16:16, Juan Ignacio wrote: > Sorry, this is the Domain Member smb.con > Im using Debian last version. > Samba compiled from the sources. > > [global] > netbios name = XXXXX > security = ADS > workgroup = XXXXXX > realm = XXXXXXX > > log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log > log level = 1 > > # idmap

Hi I am having a problem with extension matching in asterisk (I am using asterisk 1.6.0.6). Is there a difference between extensions matching in realtime architecture and extensions matching in extensions.conf file. For example when I have these two extensions: -- _0699[134]XXXXX -- _06[069]XXXXXXX that are in the database and number 0699123123 comes in asterisk will always choose exten

I am getting a priveldged command error on the manager API. 16-Feb-09 11:51 am asterisk_command() Action: Login 16-Feb-09 11:51 am asterisk_command() Username: XXX 16-Feb-09 11:51 am asterisk_command() Secret: ZZZZ 16-Feb-09 11:51 am asterisk_command() Events: off 16-Feb-09 11:51 am DEBUG: Response: Success[CR ][LF ]Message: Authentication accepted[CR ][LF ][CR ][LF ] 16-Feb-09 11:51 am

On Wed, 9 May 2018 08:37:38 -0300 Carlos via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi! > > More information: > > samba -v (compilated) > > Version 4.4.4 > > Totla Dcs = 16 > > smb.conf: > > [global] >         workgroup = XXXX >         realm = XXXX.xxxxx.com.br >         netbios name = upsilon >         server role = active

hi gurus My samba upgrade woes: - I have to run 2 instances of samba one for dev and one for UAT. both the instances are giving me hard time after the upgrade. One instance keeps giving me following error: - connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to open the domain client session to machine xxxxx.xxxxx.xxxxx.xxxxxxx.COM. Error was : NT_STATUS_CANT_ACCESS_DOMAIN_INFO. [2012/09/04

Hi, All! I Have Samba (3.5.6) domain witch have trust relations with ADS (Named TEST) Win2008 (2008 domain mode) On PDC all working very good. I have also Domain Member server in my samba Domain. When i trying type wbinfo -u, or getent passwd on samba PDC (Named BINKLG) I see all, including ADS users. When I trying do it on Domain Member Server I don't see users from ADS Is it possible to

hi... i can setup dovecot lda in postfix with sieve in testing enviroment using dovecot 1.2.10 and dovecot-1.2-sieve-0.0.15 but now i want to setup them in producction so i reproduce the steps to do them but i receive the following errors: log dovecot-deliver-errors.log: Jul 29 11:48:26 deliver(xxxx at xxxx): Error: userdb lookup: connect(/var/spool/postfix/private/auth-master) failed:

When I issue a 'core show channels' command I notice that long usernames (and channel number) are truncated. For example, if the username is FONEMITEL1234567890 for a trunk, then it will show SIP Privilege: Command Channel Location State Application(Data)" IAX2/FONEMITEL123456 1296197222 at entryhome<mailto:1296197222 at entryhome> Ringing

Hello, We need help with an issue that we are running into when we are trying to run Dovecot in Docker container. Also how do we enable debugging for dovecot. Logs doesn't show any info about the issue. Below processes are not running when a Director service is started: dovecot-Dovecot/auth dovecot-Dovecot/ssl-params dovecot-Director/lmtp dovecot-Director/ssl-params

Hi We've been using dovecot with great success so far. We are trying to add sieve support for our users. We enabled managesieve and users can define rules from the webmail (roundcube) with sieverules plugin for roundcube. Everything goes ok, but here's a problem I couldn't figure yet. When I define a redirect rule, the mail is forwarded but a local copy is stored too. Weird thing is

Hi All, I am trying to send an email on a user sign up. The email is working without any issues. However there is a problem with the :from field that I am specifying. My SMTP setting look like : ActionMailer::Base.smtp_settings = { :address => "smtp.gmail.com", :port => "587", :domain => "test.com",

Hi, I am using Dovecot 1.0 beta 7, moving to beta8 probably tomorrow. I am seeing a few RFC compliance issues with IMAP responses. I have an in-house IMAP client that caches IMAP data for a web mail system (it parses millions of IMAP interactions a day), and it reports whenever it gets a line that does not look RFC compliant. Unfortunately, users modify their mailboxes before I can get a copy

Hi, I'm evaluating what could keep me from upgrading production systems to 1.6.2. As 1.6.2 seems pretty close to 1.6.1 but I gave 1.6.2 a try but I met an issue with BLF-pickup which kept me from going further. Have you met other issues I should include include in my checklist ? Regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I would like to report an issue which is 100% reproducible with a specific mail available in the reproducer attached to Red Hat's bugzilla <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894418> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1726535): -------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< ---------------- 8< -------- Return-Path: <XXXXXXXXX at

Hi, I have a dovecot installation with a strange problem: all the mails stays in storage after deleted from users mailbox. If user logon after the mails are deleted, they don't receive them any more, but the m.## files aren?t deleted. This happens with pop3 (default for this installation) and/or imap. The dovecot is installed along postfix with mysql and multi-domains support Here's the