similar to: asterisk and fail2ban

I have fail2ban on my mail server monitoring Dovecot and Exim. I have noticed that it has stopped banning IP's. I have seen in /var/log/fail2ban.log: 2020-04-07 09:42:05,875 fail2ban.filter [16138]: INFO [dovecot] Found 77.40.61.224 - 2020-04-07 09:42:05 2020-04-07 09:42:06,408 fail2ban.actions [16138]: NOTICE [dovecot] Ban 77.40.61.224 2020-04-07 09:42:06,981

On Friday 19 April 2019 16:15:32 Kenneth Porter wrote: > On 4/19/2019 5:30 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote: > > I've followed one of the pages on line specifically for installing fail2ban on > > Centos 7 and all looks fine. > > Which page? It would help to see what they advised. > On Friday 19 April 2019 16:15:32 Kenneth Porter wrote: > On 4/19/2019 5:30 AM, Gary Stainburn

Hello list. I have a question for fail2ban for bad logins on sasl. I use sasl, sendmail and cyrus-imapd. In jail.conf I use the following syntax: [sasl-iptables] enabled = true filter = sasl backend = polling action = iptables[name=sasl, port=smtp, protocol=tcp] sendmail-whois[name=sasl, dest=my at email] logpath = /var/log/maillog maxretry = 6 and the following filter:

I'm trying to setup and test fail2ban with dovecot I've installed fail2ban, I've copied config from https://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/Fail2Ban, and, trying to test it, attempted multiple mail access with wrong password, but, get this: # fail2ban-client status dovecot-pop3imap Status for the jail: dovecot-pop3imap |- Filter | |- Currently failed: 0 | |- Total failed: 0 | `- File

Hello, fail2ban does not ban offending IP. NOTICE[29784] chan_sip.c: Registration from '"user3"<sip:1005 at asterisk-ip:5060>' failed for 'offending-IP:53417' - Wrong password NOTICE[29784] chan_sip.c: Registration from '"user3"<sip:1005 at asterisk-ip:5060>' failed for ?offending-IP:53911' - Wrong password systemctl status

On Mon, December 18, 2017 3:06 am, Alex JOST wrote: > Did you enable the dovecot service in fail2ban? By default all jails are > disabled. > > /etc/fail2ban/jail.conf: > [dovecot] > enabled = true Alex, thanks no, not in jail.conf, I've put it in the (1) /etc/fail2ban/jail.local I've also added postfix, that seems to work: I've made test failed dovecot and

Hi all... Recently a new Fail2Ban was available among some other updates for my Centos 7 system, and I just updated all. It seems that was a very BAD idea. Just noticed that Fail2Ban have generated a 6MB error log because of the update, and FirewallD a 1MB log of errors ! (not sure if any of those were really working after this) ok, I'll just run yum downgrade fail2ban I thought. Naa, no

Been working on fail2ban, and trying to make it work with plain Jane install of Centos 7 Machine is a HP running 2 Quad core Xeons, 16 gig or ram and 1 plus TB of disk space. Very generic and vanilla. Current available epel repo version is fail2ban-0.9.1 Looking at the log file, fail2ban starts and stops fine, there isn't output though showing any login attempts being restricted.

I created a filter and verified it with fail2ban-regex against actual lines in my log and it works. During restarts of fail2ban, only some previous ip's get banned immediately whereas some need a reoccurrence despite the jail's config specification of maxretry and findtime suggesting the entries mandate blocking. I'd assume the behavior after a restart is noe way if it weren't for

> > > > /var/log/fail2ban.log is showing that it's working: > > I have seem similar odd behaviour with f2b with other filters. > Try to uninstall the package > fail2ban-systemd > and stop and start fail2ban again. > This might change its behavior to the better. > The fail2ban-systemd package configures fail2ban to use systemd journal for log input. The OP

Hi! I have a server running CentOS 7.7 (1908) with all current patches installed. I think this server should be a quite standard installation with no specialities On this server I have fail2ban with an apache and openvpn configuration. I'm using firewalld to manage the firewall rules. Fail2an is configured to use firewalld: [root at server ~]# ll /etc/fail2ban/jail.d/ insgesamt 12

Hello List, with CentOS 7.2 it is not longer possible to run fail2ban on a Server ? I install a new CentOS 7.2 and the EPEL directory yum install fail2ban I don't change anything only I create a jail.local to enable the Filters [sshd] enabled = true .... ..... When I start afterward fail2ban systemctl status fail2ban is clean But systemctl status firewalld is broken ? firewalld.service -

P? Tue, 31 Dec 2019 18:53:38 +0000 John H Nyhuis <jnyhuis at uw.edu> skrev: > Just a random stab in the dark, but CEntOS6 was iptables, and CentOS7 > is firewalld. They take different fail2ban packages. > > CentOS6 = fail2ban > CentOS7 = fail2ban-firewalld > > Are you sure you are running the correct fail2ban package for your > firewall? (I screwed this up myself

If this is a small site, I recommend you download the free version of SecAst (www.telium.ca <http://www.telium.ca> ) and replace fail2ban. SecAst does NOT use the log file, or regexes, to match etc.instead it talks to Asterisk through the AMI to extract security information. Messing with regexes is a losing battle, and the lag in reading logs can allow an attacker 100+ registration

I've got an up-to-date Centos 5.8 and can't seem to get fail2ban to get rid of troublesome sshd login attempts. /etc/fail2ban/jail.conf has these sections: [ssh] enabled = true port = ssh filter = sshd logpath = /var/log/auth.log maxretry = 6 # Generic filter for pam. Has to be used with action which bans all ports # such as iptables-allports, shorewall [pam-generic] enabled =

I am working to a CentOS 6 server with nonstandard iptables system without rule for ACCEPT ESTABLISHED connections. All tables and chains empty (flush by legacy custom script) so only filter/INPUT chain has rules (also fail2ban chain): Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination f2b-postfix tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 ACCEPT all --

On a CentOS 6.7 system that's been running fail2ban for a long time, we recently started seeing this: ct 28 19:00:59 <servername> fail2ban.action[17561]: ERROR iptables -w -D INPUT -p tcp --dport ssh -j f2b-SSH#012iptables -w -F f2b-SSH#012iptables -w -X f2b-SSH -- stderr: "iptables v1.4.7: option `-w' requires an argument\nTry `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for

Hi, Some time ago I had SELinux problems with Fail2ban. One of the users on this list suggested that it might be due to the fact that I'm using a bone-headed iptables script instead of FirewallD. I've spent the past few weeks getting up to date with doing things in a more orthodox manner. So currently my internet-facing CentOS server has a nicely configured NetworkManager, and

Is there an easy way to setup diaplan so when someone pushes a digit such as * during a call, they will be transferred to another destination. For example, a caller is hearing ringing while calling a UA, but instead of waiting for the UA to pick up, they can push * and go directly to that UA's voicemail. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Feb 26, 2020, at 08:52, Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > >> Le 26/02/2020 ? 11:51, Nicolas Kovacs a ?crit : >> SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/python2.7 from read access on the file disable. >> ***** Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests ***** >> If you believe that python2.7 should be allowed read access on the disable file by default.