similar to: [Dahdi 2.4.0] Flash() hangs up

Hello Incoming calls from the FXO trigger an AGI script which simply NOOP data sent by Asterisk through stdin. The first two NOOP work fine, but after this, Asterisk isn't happy: ============= extensions.conf ... [from_fxo] exten => s,1,Wait(2) exten => s,n,Set(CID=${CALLERID(num)}) exten => s,n,AGI(/var/tmp/test.lua) exten => s,n,Wait(5) exten => s,n,Hangup =============

Hello No matter what I try, Asterisk still fails dialing back through a callfile built through an AGI script. The whole thing works fine when the original call that triggers Asterisk is from an internal extension (Xlite), but it fails when it's from my cellphone ringing through the FXO/Zaptel port and I want to wait a few seconds and call back through the FXO/Zaptel. Could it that even

Hello The following, dead simple Bash script ran as AGI doesn't reply to Asterisk: ============= extensions.conf [from_fxo] exten => s,1,Wait(2) exten => s,n,Set(CID=${CALLERID(num)}) exten => s,n,AGI(/var/tmp/basic.agi) exten => s,n,Hangup() ============= /var/tmp/basic.agi #!/bin/bash #Ripped from #http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2003-July/008554.html while

Hello I'd like to configure Asterisk so that... 1. I ring it from my cellphone with CID number displayed, just to notify Asterisk that I wish to make a call 2. Asterisk waits until I hang up, calls me back, and prompts me for the number I wish to call 3. Asterisk puts me on hold through Flash(), which is apparently the equivalent of hitting the R key on European handsets 4. Asterisk calls the

I am having a problem getting users that were added in smbldap-useradd to be able to login. After I add them they are visible, but you can see I get this error - pdb_get_group_sid: Failed to find Unix account for test10 I believe that this has something to do with nss_ldap. because doing a getent passwd, it doesn't display any smb info. Any debugging info or help would be amazing, I'm

With Thunderbird 3.1 I can now "delete" a folder which moves it to Trash. But I cannot remove the folder in Trash. The following is from the Thunderbird log file: 248[6814c00]: 8103800:imap.kzone.ch:A:SendData: 64 rename "test10" "Trash/test10" 248[6814c00]: 8103800:imap.kzone.ch:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: 64 OK Rename completed. 248[6814c00]:

Thanks, Sanjay, that makes sense. The opportunity for improving instcombining splat sounds promising. Another question about shuffle simplification. This is a testcase from test/Transforms/InstCombine/vec_shuffle.ll: define <4 x i32> @test10(<4 x i32> %tmp5) nounwind { %tmp6 = shufflevector <4 x i32> %tmp5, <4 x i32> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 undef, i32

Hello Using Asterisk 1.4.20 and Zaptel 1.4.3-1, I notice that Asterisk sends FXO calls to a context named "numberplan-local" that is not mentionned in my configuration file, which prevents incoming calls to be successfull: ======= /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf ================== [trunkgroups] [channels] ;Send incoming calls to this context in extensions.conf context=from_fxo

Although the specific behaviour that was reported has been fixed, bugs remain in Sweave's processing of comment lines when keep.source=TRUE This is in some senses a follow-up from earlier bugs. Hence the query -- what is the preferred procedure, to submit a new bug report? (Another option might be to add a comment to the web page for bug 14459.) Is there now a preference to submit via

I'm having a bit of a problem here: I have a * box with a fritz isdn card (running capi 2.0 and chan_capi) and a x100p card for testing purposes. As a proof of concept, I wanted to be able to dial into the * using the isdn line, listen to a message, and enter a 3 digit extension number. If this happens, I wanted the * box to dial out using the x100p card, into our PBX (Nortel Meridian). If

Hi, can anyone tell me what does that 2.4.0+2.4.0 means in dahdi release numbering ??? 2.4.0????? regards upendra. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20120411/9b160392/attachment.htm>

Hi, I'm using a two-years old installation script for the first time on a Squeeze (linux 2.6.32) platform. For an unknown reason (might be an obvious one), Dahdi can't be loaded anymore. 1. First of all, it seems /dev/dahdi content was previously (ie in Lenny) owned by asterisk:asterisk (asterisk is run as asterisk). Now it is owned by root. Any clue about this ? 2. Secondly, I changed

Hello On a brand new CentOS 5.5 host, I wanted to install Dahdi before installing Asterisk 1.4.x. So I untarred dahdi-linux-complete-2.4.0+2.4.0.tar.gz, followed by make, make install, make config. Next, I created the following files from scratch: ============ /etc/modprobe.d/dahdi.conf: options wctdm opermode=FRANCE ============ /etc/dahdi/modules wctdm ============ /etc/dahdi/system.conf

Hello I'm using an AGI script in Lua to make a callback through Zaptel. For this to work, I must wait until the channel is idle, or I get this kind of error, even after waiting over 10 seconds after the remote end rings once and hangs up: ============== channel.c:2863 __ast_request_and_dial: Unable to request channel Zap/1/123456 pbx_spool.c:341 attempt_thread: Call failed to go through,

After a reboot, I can't reproduce the problem anymore which is quite frustating. 2011/6/14 Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 03:44:32PM +0200, Olivier wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm using a two-years old installation script for the first time on a > > Squeeze (linux 2.6.32) platform. > > For an unknown reason (might

can someone confirm this? it does not happen on openbsd. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Florian Wunderlich <fwunderlich at devbrain.de> Subject: Re: fds closed after SIGCHLD bug still in newest version Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 14:44:17 +0100 Size: 3926 Url:

People, I''m trying to run the ruby debugger against a Test::Unit::TestCase class which is a parent of a Rails class. I started my study with a simple script: # # bikle_test.rb # require ''test/unit'' class BikleTest < Test::Unit::TestCase def setup @string10 = "hello" end def test10 assert_equal @string10, "hello" end end The

Hi. I've tried GTA3 on wine with the kernel 2.6-test10 and I've found it a lot faster than with the 2.4.22. The problem is that the games is very fast but it's not smooth, once a second it'll block for some millseconds but this not happen always and not with the same frequency... this happens the same with or without kernel preemption. After some tryes I've discovered that

> This patch looks good, but you need to add a test case. You can add it > to the file test/CodeGen/R600/zero_extend.ll Version 2 of patch attached which includes test case. -Jon -------------- next part --------------

I just updated from zaptel to dahdi 2.4.0 I dont recall missing keys or duplicating keys with zaptel. With dahdi 2.4.0 I tried serveral calls and I was trying to enter 204 and I got 2204. Is there another or new parameter I need to tweek? Thanks, jerry