similar to: Inbound SIP calls work, just not when making calls between extensions.

On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:46:24 +0100 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 03.01.19 um 15:29 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:08:46 +0100 > > "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> We are in the process of switching over shares

Am 03.01.19 um 15:29 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 15:08:46 +0100 > "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> We are in the process of switching over shares from the old way of >> doing this to Windows ACLs: >> >> disable "valid users" "write list" etc >>

Reply to sender Reply to all Reply to folder Forward Move/Copy Delete Read previous item Read next item Get help information on the current window From: McMurtry, Benjamin G. To: 'r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch' Cc: Subject: Table Help Sent: 5/24/2005 4:33 PM Importance: Normal I have a very large table that I want to add some of the certain rows. The table is

Hello Community, Getting back to my previous post, here a a complement: - Having enabled sieve, I can store mails and create folder under the recipient - Having enabled public folders, I can move mail into them using a client (eg Thunderbird); security is therefore ok (actually I gave full control to the user) eg Public/Newsletters/SomeCompany - *BUT* running a sieve script to store to

Hello everyone, I have a 50-client Samba installation here (version of Samba is 3.0.12). The problem is, that files are not locked correctly. The scenario is the following: 1. User A opens a word document file and edits it 2. User B tries to open the same file, too 3. Instead of getting a warning that the file is in use by another user (like it was when we had NT4), Word opens the file without

On Monday 10. September 2007 01:10:44 Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On 9/10/07, Daniel Aleksandersen <aleksandersen@runbox.com> wrote: > > It is indeed necessary. I hope this format will be a huge leap in > > metadata descriptions for media content. Not only for music, but any > > media found in Oggs. > > You are thinking too small. Such standards

Hi, I have an application that requires a login to be able to view secured documents and need to give the users the option of emailing the document using their default email client, in this case Outlook. The Web server is Debian Basically I need to know, how to have an action, that will download the file to a specific location on the client system then bring up Outlook with subject and

Hello All: I'm having a strange issue with the yum proxy settings. It is directly related to passwords containing exclamation points. For example, the following works fine in yum.conf: http_proxy=http://somentlmproxy.somecompany.com http_password=regularpassword However, if the password contains any exclamation points, it will not authenticate properly. E.g., a password such as

Hi I've 3 iax connections to my provider , each of them have own DID , PH1<----| | \/ PH2<-->|-----| <---------------------------> |----|<-- DID1 | A1 | <---------------------------> |ISP |<-- DID2 PH3<-->|-----| <---------------------------> |----|<-- DID3 I had iax phone on each of this connection , but now I want to terminate all

i setup a RedHat server with samba/kerberos/winbind. I can retrieve my user and groups with wbinfo -u and wbinfo -g. BUT in the listings, the name appears like that : wbinfo -u DOMAIN+username1 DOMAIN+username2 DOMAIN+username3 DOMAIN+username4 If i try to authenticate a user with wbinfo -a username1%password i've got this error : plaintext password authentication failed error code was

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 13:40:59 -0500 Dale Schroeder <dale at BriannasSaladDressing.com> wrote: [snip] > > Sorry Rowland, but the break happened before the badlock patches when > Debian jumped from 4.1.x to 4.3.x, skipping 4.2.x altogether. [snip] > > Jim, currently at Debian 4.4.5. If you search this list, you will > find others who have had the same thing happen. To my

Many git commits in the monorepo look like the following: [Tag0][Tag1] Title line Summary: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Quisque mauris neque, porta nec tristique at, sagittis vel nisi. Fusce pharetra nunc et mauris consequat venenatis. Reviewers: username0, username1 Reviewed By: username0 Subscribers: username2, username3,

On 7/27/2016 12:18 PM, Jim Seymour wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 13:40:59 -0500 > Dale Schroeder <dale at BriannasSaladDressing.com> wrote: > > [snip] >> Sorry Rowland, but the break happened before the badlock patches when >> Debian jumped from 4.1.x to 4.3.x, skipping 4.2.x altogether. > [snip] >> Jim, currently at Debian 4.4.5. If you search this list, you

Hi all, New to Samba here so please bear with dumb questions. I have a server that's currently running SMB shares off of device 10.0.0.1 on a private network. It has a second device, 10.0.0.2 that I would like to add to the device bindings for Samba. I've tried this in the smb.conf file but it doesn't seem to work. Here's what I tried: workgroup = SOMECOMPANY netbios

Can we fix this in reviews.llvm.org's fork of phab? https://github.com/phacility/phabricator/blob/cac3dc4983c3671ba4ec841aac8efac10744a80c/src/applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialGetCommitMessageConduitAPIMethod.php Seems straightforward(-ish) to drop the relevant fields there, that way `arc land` automatically DTRT. Jon On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 11:30 PM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev

Hi all, i am after hours unfold of trying to implement a searchbar in a table with a habtam relashinship, but alas ! with no success... i was hoping some kind gentle mind can help me through these diffucult times; i have now reached the point where out of sheer annoyance, i cannot see myself getting anywhere nearer to the target, and was hopefully hoping one of you out there could help me

I also find the "Reviewed by" tag useful (as well as the review link), for the same reasons. In fact, I don't even use arcanist to push commits, so I do it all by hand, and only include the "Reviewed by" and "Differential Revision" tags. On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 at 20:55, David Blaikie via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I don't think

The limitation with the "Reviewed by" line is that if you just use `arc` it indicates who was added as reviewer on the revision, but not who approved it. Because of this, I am wary of relying on this line for anything. If you want to know who reviewed a change, better click on the Differential Revision link and go to the source of truth. -- Mehdi On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 10:44 AM

Hi Chris, I've properly started looking into this yesterday. NSD definitely shouldn't crash, still working on that. However, the provided zone is invalid too(?) I'm not the foremost expert on NSEC3 (or even DNSSEC), but is seems an NSEC3 is missing for bar.foo.com. Empty non-terminals should still have an NSEC3 RR. (Of course, the delegation point should be at bar.foo.com. too and

I'm sure I've seen many commits with both "Reviewed by:" and "Reviewers:" tags, which look to have been done with arc (though I can't be sure). How were those generated? On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 at 19:12, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, I tend to prune it down myself - and if the list has only one name > on it, it's usually a pretty