similar to: HP DL360G7 with T1 card(s)

Can anyone here report success or failure at making the Asus Xonar DX PCI-express sound card work under CentOS 4? Or failing that, 5? Google only turned up people using it on Ubunt or SuSE... I need to specify the addition of audio outputs to a HP DL360 system, and don't want to buy stuff that will be a pain to get working. :-) Or can anyone recommend any other simple sound cards for

I have some more investigation to do on this, but I wanted to see if anyone here had any insight into the issue I've run into. The hardware is a HP DL360 G6 with a TE420 gen 5 4-port T1 PRI card. It is one of several systems that have been running without issue since 2010/2011. They have all been running CentOS 4 32-bit with Zaptel 1.4.12.1 (with patch for gen 5 card), libpri 1.2.8 and

In article <CAHZ_z=w5DMg93gShtC93kuC+fnmraPgV46BS956U5BQXVgyhxg at mail.gmail.com>, Matt Fredrickson <creslin at digium.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:44 AM, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > > I have some more investigation to do on this, but I wanted to see if anyone > > here had any insight into the issue I've run into. > > >

I have recently built a single-T1 Asterisk box using an HP DL120G6 with a Digium TE122 card. I was finding that I was getting missed interrupts on the TE122, causing the driver to report that it was increasing latency. It kept doing this until the T1 did not work reliably. I tried my usual procedure of disabling the USB subsystem in the BIOS (or so I thought), but I found that the USB drivers

I have just built a new system using an HP DL360G7 with a TE420 T1 card, and this is the first system using a generation 7 server. I'm not sure whether that is an issue or not. I am using Asterisk 1.2, and Zaptel 1.4.12.1 with patches for GEN5 of the TE420 card. I have successfully used this combination on several systems based on the DL360G6 and TE420(gen5), which have been in production for

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 4:57 PM, Matt Fredrickson <creslin at digium.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> > wrote: > > In article <CAHZ_z=w5DMg93gShtC93kuC+fnmraPgV46BS956U5BQXVgyhxg@ > mail.gmail.com>, > > Matt Fredrickson <creslin at digium.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:44 AM, Tony

I am trying to install CentOS5 on a new HP DL360e G8 with B120i disk controller. It appears that a proprietary HP driver is needed for it. I found a useful description at http://www.linuxhelp.in/2013/08/Installing-centos-on-HP-Proliant-DL360e-Gen8-with-B120i-controller.html I have a pair of hard drives to use as a RAID1 mirror. My question to people who may have been this way already is: is it

In article <mfbt6f$9rt$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > I am trying to debug a SIP issue, between an Asterisk 1.2.32 system that > is behind a network device to which I don't have ready access, which is > performing NAT with possibly some kind of SIP ALG, and an Asterisk 11 > system on a public IP. > > My question is

In article <n009u2$85v$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > Apologies, this is slightly off-topic being to do with an EPEL package, > although it's running on CentOS6, so I thought others here might have come > across this issue. > > I have five CentOS 6 systems running fail2ban from EPEL, and this > package was updated

Has anyone else experienced a problem with the LED for span 1 on a TE410P or TE405P? I had a TE410P on which the span 1 LED would not light red, but once the span was connected, it did correctly light green. I RMAed the board to our UK distrbutor and received a replacement. However, the replacement board displayed the same problem! Wondering if it was related to the computer I was putting it

In article <20151125133008.6369360.14455.17239 at gmail.com>, Israel Gottlieb <isrlgb at gmail.com> wrote: > Try putting progress instead of answer Yes, I tried Progress already, and it didn't help. But thanks for the suggestion! Tony > I have a puzzling situation, and would be grateful for any insight. > > I have a dialplan that forwards an incoming call out to

In article <ml1jnh$afr$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > When I started using CentOS 6 instead of CentOS 5, I discovered that > "less" no longer understood \< and \>, which I had been used to using > since almost forever. > > Eventually research revealed that in the Fedora version on which > RHEL 6 was

Thanks for the suggestion Tony, I installed each codec for MoH, core sounds, and extra sound packages. Unfortunately the tests produce the same results. [Sep 1 20:36:45] ERROR[10081][C-00007fe5]: frame.c:343 ast_frdup: FRACK!, Failed assertion Excessive refcount 100000 reached on ao2 object 0x20380b0 ( continuously for a while followed by a [Sep 1 20:36:46] WARNING[7761][C-0000770d]:

worked came to one ring only now. Thank you very much. If I use TE410 or TE405 instead of X100P. do it make that first ring disappear? Shakil -----Original Message----- From: tony@softins.clara.co.uk [mailto:tony@softins.clara.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 12:27 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Auto Answering PSTN --> Asterisk using X100PCard In

In article <CAG2kNCyjsQZ2qW_8BBLp8BH_20=JgxoEYpn9BSwZhXg7_rHBbg at mail.gmail.com>, Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> > wrote: > > > I am just applying the latest C6 updates to a couple of KVM Linodes. > > It appears that the latest update of util-linux-ng has

In article <301a2e78-d490-3805-e30f-41b668aac5c1 at sysnux.pf>, Jean-Denis Girard <jd.girard at sysnux.pf> wrote: > > Hi Tony, > > Le 20/07/2019 à 06:29, Tony Mountifield a écrit : > > Are there any other languages/libraries I should be considering? > > Same here, after years of AGI / AMI, I recently made my first project > using ARI on Asterisk-16. I love

I want to use fail2ban on CentOS 6 to monitor Apache with the standard default logfile format ("combined"). Has anyone here succeeded in doing so? The format has the IP at the start of the line, followed by two dashes (if no authentication) and THEN the timestamp. What I've read on the fail2ban wiki seems to say that the timestamp must ALWAYS be at the start of the line, followed by

On 06/09/2015 12:48 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > On 06/09/2015 12:33 AM, tony at softins.co.uk (Tony Mountifield) wrote: >> In article <ml1jnh$afr$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, >> Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: >>> When I started using CentOS 6 instead of CentOS 5, I discovered that >>> "less" no longer understood \<

Ok, that sounds a little more elegant. Does that delete switch delete those files after download, or does it stop it from downloading at all? On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > In article <CANZsmmM6C_F+NuPdjd+mGDEXaJVcfc1bdhpWdESSbC2CR7Dz3 > g at mail.gmail.com>, > Felipe Westfields <felipe.westfields at gmail.com>

@tonymountifield Does this still hold true? https://superuser.com/a/1075837 On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 7:21 AM Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > In article <E02FA554-9D6D-4E7D-8A78-5FBDE1DE939D at kicp.uchicago.edu>, > Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sep 26, 2020, at 8:05 AM, Jerry Geis