similar to: Asterisk ports

Thank you for the reply. On 8 Dec 2010 at 13:38, Danny (Danny Nicholas <danny at debsinc.com>) commented about RE: [asterisk-users] Configuring Softphone: > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Gary Kuznitz > Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 1:27 PM > To: Asterisk

I see in sip debug it says Audio is at port 10342 Express Talk suggests Audio at UDP 8000-8020 I've tried changing Express Talk to 10000 and forwarded 10000-10400. Is there a possibility Express Talk won't work in the 10000 range? Is it possible to limit Asterisk to 8000-8020? Thank you, Gary

Someone has hacked into our system and is making calls overseas. How can I: 1. Find out the where the calls are originating from? 2. Block all calls that are not authorized? Our system is in the USA. Only calls from inside our LAN are allowed. Thank you, Gary Kuznitz -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I have been told that my logic in extentions.conf is wrong in trying to configure a SIP software phone called Express Talk (remote) . I'd like to make outgoing calls and calls to local extensions. Could someone please look at my configuration files at http://pastebin.com/ajp62wqF and see what I did wrong? Thank you, Gary

Hi, I wonder if anyone has any suggestions on how to setup a network to run VPN over wireless. I currently have: Wireless Laptop ----> Router with VPN pass through ---> DSL modem. There is also a wired desktop running Win '98se connected to the router. The Wireless Laptop is running XP Pro sp1. I am open for suggestions on how to run VPN over the wireless. I just want to protect

Hi, I'm trying to get a softphone configured. In Sip.conf [general] I found an example that said I need: nat=yes localnet=192.168.xxx.xxx Is localnet supposed to be a LAN IP or a WAN IP? Thank you, Gary

Hi all I fancied playing with SER and * on the same box. So i thought i'd just change the default sip port for * in sip.conf [general] port = 5065 ; Port to bind to (SIP is 5060) bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 ; Address to bind to (all addresses on machine) restarted * and now when i issue a > ]# netstat -anp |grep 5060 > udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:5060 0.0.0.0:*

I can run nmbd successfully, but smbd dies almost immediately when I run it, the smbd.log file has the message "bind failed on port 139 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0.". When I do a netstat -an | grep 139, it shows that tcp is listening on port 139. How do I resolve this conflict between tcp and smbd?

I'm running samba 4.1.2 on Linux Mint 15. Getting the following: ? ./samba-tool drs kcc samba-realm Failed to connect host 192.168.231.132 on port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED Failed to connect host 192.168.231.132 (samba-realm) on port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED. I don't see samba or smbd listening on port 135. 53 and 137 are. e.g.: ? netstat -anp | grep samba | grep

results from 'netstat -tlpn' gives me a line... tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:46929 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN - googling for port 46929 doesn't turn up anything and so I don't have a clue what process this belongs to. Do I have to start capturing activity on this port or is there a better way to find out what this port is about? -- Craig White <craig at

I'd like to find out how to block everyone outside of the our LAN. The following phone call got through: 1. accountcode: Blank 2. src: Caller*ID number Blank 3. dst: Destination extension 901185294464086 4. dcontext: Destination context DLPN_DialPlan1 5. clid: Caller*ID with text Blank 6. channel: Channel used SIP/xxx-088c48d8 7. dstchannel: Destination channel

Hy everybody, I have a little problem. Since a crash of my server we have problems to connect over the RSAT tools to our Samba 4 domain with the DNS tool. At the moment we have a Centos 6.5 server with Version 4.1.6-SerNet-RedHat-7.el6. If I connect to the AD server with the RSAT tool, i get this message in the log.smb: dnsserver: Found DNS zone _msdcs.nagy-blumen.at [2014/03/17

Remco B. Brink wrote: ><quote who="jensen galan"> > > > >>greetings! >> >>when i try to start the icecast server i get the >>following error: >> >>Could not create listener socket on port 8000 >>Server startup failed. Exiting. >> >>I did make sure that iptables has port 8000 open for >>tcp. >>

Hi, I have already tried to change for bindaddr=0.0.0.0 but it didn't worked. 2016-08-26 11:44 GMT-03:00, Frank Vanoni <mailinglist at linuxista.com>: > On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 10:12 -0300, Vitor Mazuco wrote: > >> bindaddr = all > > Try: > > bindaddr=0.0.0.0 > > > > > -- > _____________________________________________________________________

I currently have in extensions.conf: exten => 106,1,Set(CALLFILENAME=${TIMESTAMP}_${CALLERID(num)}) exten => 106,n,Monitor(wav,${CALLFILENAME},m) exten => 106,hint,SIP/106 exten => 106,Macro(stdexten,106,${HINT}) When I called x106 this was logged: -- Executing [106 at voicemenu-custom-4:1] Set("DAHDI/7-1", "CALLFILENAME=_xxxxxxx") in new stack --

I had lines 3 and 4 and added line 1 and 2 to extensions.conf exten => 106,1,SetVar(CALLFILENAME=${TIMESTAMP}_${CALLERID(num)}) exten => 106,2,Monitor(wav,${CALLFILENAME},m) exten => 106,3,hint,SIP/106 exten => 106,4,Macro(stdexten,106,${HINT}) I received this warning: WARNING[31463]: pbx.c:1832 pbx_extension_helper: No application 'SetVar' for extension

Hi, see the log below root at AsteriskSlave:~# ip addr 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: p3p1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu

Hi, I''m a home user who doesn''t understand the workings of the Shorewall firewall (or the linux OS on which I''ve just installed it) very well. Having just installed Shorewall 1.4.6c with a default "home user" configuration I gave it a run against the online ShieldsUp scan. Main surprise was that the ICMP echo was enabled. I''ve since gone into

I just see warning? 2016-08-29 11:30 GMT-03:00, Telium Technical Support <support at telium.ca>: > This shows that asterisk's IAX is already bound to all adapters - so that's > good. Symptomatically does your IAX stop working? Or do you just see a > warning? > > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com >

Hello! I have laid SSL aside for the time being, and continued compiling and installing Dovecot. Now I don't know how to start it! I have been through the config file and mostly left things as-is. I have created the dovecot user and group and put only dovecot user in the dovecot group. Then I tried imap-master, as specified in the INSTALL documentation, but there is no such file! Under