Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "Extension continues ringing after caller hanged up"
2008 Dec 21
3
[Bug 19223] New: Exit code of X-Windows restart is always failure
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19223
Summary: Exit code of X-Windows restart is always failure
Product: xorg
Version: git
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Driver/nouveau
AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
2008 Dec 21
5
[Bug 19214] New: video mode change causes monitor to go out of range
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19214
Summary: video mode change causes monitor to go out of range
Product: xorg
Version: git
Platform: x86 (IA32)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Driver/nouveau
AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
2012 May 11
2
Help
I am trying to figure out 2 things. First I have downloaded the version 4.05 of the syslinux distribution and am looking for the pxelinux.0 file and can't see to find it in the distribution am I missing something?
Secondly I have an older copy and I can get it to boot to the tftp32 server for a server I am building. It errors out when it gets to the nic card and then exists to the shell.
2011 Aug 30
2
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of phi instructions?
Hi all,
is there a pass to get rid of phi-instructions in a function? There's no loop involved.
I have a function approx. like this:
void @func() {
entry:
…
bb1:
…
bb2:
…
%tmp100 = phi i32 [ 0, bb1 ], [ 1, bb2 ] …
%tmp101 = getelementptr …, %tmp100
tail call void @anotherfunc(…, %tmp101)
ret void
}
I would like it to rather be something like this:
void @func() {
entry:
…
bb1:
...
2011 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of phi instructions?
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Teemu Rinta-aho
<teemu.rinta-aho at nomadiclab.com> wrote:
> On 31.8.2011, at 11.41, Eli Friedman wrote:
>
>> Mmm... reg2mem will transform IR with PHI's into IR without them, but
>> it generates a bunch of alloca's, which I would assume are not cheap
>> to lower to VHDL. You might have to write your own pass to get the
2011 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of phi instructions?
> the next tool reading the IR does not like phis when it's generating VHDL.
If you're doing a conversion from LLVM IR to some other non-SSA IR
(like the tool's), you can do the phi node removal yourself as you
convert. Basically, every predecessor block referenced by a phi node
will have an assignment to that variable before branching. There are
techniques to make the resultant
2004 Nov 14
1
overflow in RExcel (PR#7368)
Full_Name: Isto Aho
Version: 2.0.0
OS: Windows XP
Submission from: (NULL) (80.186.9.143)
Hi,
The bug can be reproduced as follows. Install R 2.0.0 and RExcel.
Take an excel sheet having 65000 rows and 11 columns, integer values.
Give the 'context' command 'put R val' for the large enough selection
of rows. (I didn't check, how many are needed, but it seems that
10000 rows
2009 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] Arm port
Sandeep Patel wrote:
> My goal is to have Cortex-A9 support complete in far less than three
> months. I've recently gotten some additional help toward that goal, so
> the pace should pick up soon.
>
> As far as compiler texts, there are many newer texts to recommend as
> just about all the major optimization passes are done differently
> after SSA-form appeared in about
2009 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] Arm port
Christophe Avoinne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> - Cortex-A8 needs a specific instruction scheduler as dual issue forces
> you to interleave some instructions to allow to run two instructions in
> the same cycle for the best performance (Cortex-A9 is out-of-order so
> dual issue is not an issue (!) for performance).
> - Cortex-A8/A9 have several useful new instructions : for instance,
2013 Feb 10
0
[Bug 3099] Please parallelize filesystem scan
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3099
--- Comment #6 from Arie Skliarouk <skliarie at gmail.com> 2013-02-10 06:45:30 UTC ---
Any hope for the bug to be resolved? It is really inconvenient to have
production database to be down for double amount of time than what is really
necessary.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are
2009 May 21
6
[LLVMdev] Arm port
My goal is to have Cortex-A9 support complete in far less than three
months. I've recently gotten some additional help toward that goal, so
the pace should pick up soon.
As far as compiler texts, there are many newer texts to recommend as
just about all the major optimization passes are done differently
after SSA-form appeared in about 1991. However, for adding Cortex-A8
support, I don't
2003 Mar 19
2
WINBIND with usernames with &
Samba doesn't allow connections from usernames that have & in them. For
example, using 2.2.5 and winbind with
security = DOMAIN
password server = win2kmixed
workgroup = MIXEDDOMAIN
all my users can login, (for example MIXEDDOMAIN+aho, MIXEDDOMAIN+tdickson),
but my users named "&" and "bobalso&" (which should be MIXEDDOMAIN+& and
MIXEDDOMAIN+bobalso&)
2004 Feb 16
2
R Included with Open Infrastructure for Outcomes (OIO) system
Hi all,
I came across this article on LinuxMedNews (http://www.linuxmednews.com)
this morning:
http://www.linuxmednews.com/linuxmednews/1076524250/index_html
This refers to an integrated data management and analysis system (OIO),
which includes R and utilizes the RSessionDA package (Greg Warnes).
More information is available here for those interested:
2010 Sep 23
1
[LLVMdev] Mapping C++ class names to LLVM type names?
Hi,
We are writing a utility whose input includes the names of some C++ classes,
and we want to locate the corresponding LLVM types in the current module.
I'm trying to look through LLVM and clang sources but cannot figure out how
the LLVM type names are constructed for the C++ class names. Any help
appreciated (like the name of a library call to do it or even a pointer
to code where this
2011 Aug 30
0
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of phi instructions?
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Teemu Rinta-aho
<teemu.rinta-aho at nomadiclab.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> is there a pass to get rid of phi-instructions in a function? There's no loop involved.
reg2mem.
> I have a function approx. like this:
>
> void @func() {
> entry:
> …
> bb1:
> …
> bb2:
> …
> %tmp100 = phi i32 [ 0,
2011 Aug 31
0
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of phi instructions?
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Teemu Rinta-aho
<teemu.rinta-aho at nomadiclab.com> wrote:
> On 30.8.2011, at 19.19, Eli Friedman wrote:
>
>> reg2mem won't do quite this transformation... not sure exactly what you need.
>
> I need to get rid of phis. This code is compiled from C++ and for some functions
> there are no phis, but multiple call instructions. I am
2009 May 22
0
[LLVMdev] Arm port
Sandeep Patel wrote:
> My goal is to have Cortex-A9 support complete in far less than three
> months. I've recently gotten some additional help toward that goal, so
> the pace should pick up soon.
>
> As far as compiler texts, there are many newer texts to recommend as
> just about all the major optimization passes are done differently
> after SSA-form appeared in about
2006 Apr 18
1
[LLVMdev] OpenBSD. (Was: 1.7 Pre-Release Ready for Testing)
I'll Check it out.. is it in the CVS or the release yet.. or how do I apply a patch to it... thanks much for the update.. I'll feel better about the whole thing..OpenBSD is really nice with the pro-police stack and would like to see an alternative to the GCC only compiler chain of tools especially as it is based on a somewhat archaic optiminzation backend and procedural stuff is pretty
2011 Aug 31
4
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of phi instructions?
On 30.8.2011, at 19.19, Eli Friedman wrote:
> reg2mem won't do quite this transformation... not sure exactly what you need.
I need to get rid of phis. This code is compiled from C++ and for some functions
there are no phis, but multiple call instructions. I am targeting hardware
in the end, and the next tool reading the IR does not like phis when it's generating VHDL.
My questions may
2011 Aug 31
2
[LLVMdev] Getting rid of phi instructions?
On 31.8.2011, at 11.41, Eli Friedman wrote:
> Mmm... reg2mem will transform IR with PHI's into IR without them, but
> it generates a bunch of alloca's, which I would assume are not cheap
> to lower to VHDL. You might have to write your own pass to get the
> precise transformation you're looking for.
Right. Thanks. I need to see the reg2mem source code.
Teemu