similar to: 3xx redirect response list Noop and capture

Sometimes I see in a context "NoOp" What is the purpose of "NoOp" (no operation) if it does nothing? -- #Joseph

> > Let me guess: The context in which you have the 2 thru n priorities is > the same one as you're using for regcontext right? > > Don't do that, bad things will happen (as you've noticed). > > I'd have to review the code again, but I think what you're seeing is as > a result of this. > > Regards, > - Brad > No, not exactly, I have a

OK this was an easy one to fix. All I had to do is RTFM. Note on the wiki: ATTENTION: Make sure you take a look at bug report 7144 Just do what Kevin said, include the regcontext in whatever static context you have the priority 2 extension and don't make a static regcontext in extension.conf. Let sip module do the rest. Works great. Thanks Guys. JR On 12/5/06, JR Richardson

Hi, I've new to http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+AEL2 I'm using NoOp and Verbose functions inside extensions.ael. Strangely, NoOp is not printing anything in Asterisk console while Verbose is working. Am I missing something obvious ? Cheers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Some of the alpha pci noop dma ops are identical to the common ones. Use them. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> --- arch/alpha/kernel/pci-noop.c | 46 ++++---------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/pci-noop.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/pci-noop.c index 2b1f4a1..8e735b5e 100644 ---

Some of the alpha pci noop dma ops are identical to the common ones. Use them. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> --- arch/alpha/kernel/pci-noop.c | 46 ++++---------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/pci-noop.c

We are going to require dma_ops for several common drivers, even for systems that do have an identity mapping. Lets provide some minimal no-op dma_ops that can be used for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> --- include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 2 ++ lib/Makefile | 1 + lib/dma-noop.c | 75

We are going to require dma_ops for several common drivers, even for systems that do have an identity mapping. Lets provide some minimal no-op dma_ops that can be used for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> --- include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 2 ++ lib/Makefile | 2 +- lib/dma-noop.c | 77

We are going to require dma_ops for several common drivers, even for systems that do have an identity mapping. Lets provide some minimal no-op dma_ops that can be used for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> --- include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 2 ++ lib/Makefile | 1 +

Hi all, i want lock Zap channels via global var FREE1 if FREE1 = 1 then call should go on with nothing and waiting for digits to go in _X. Otherwise hangup the channel But if the GotoIf goes to s|4 (NoOp) then comes a ringing indication.... !? The "immediate" property in the zapat.conf is "yes" [tel1] exten => s,1,GotoIf($[${FREE1} = 1]?s|4:s|2) exten =>

> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of > JR Richardson > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 3:49 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [asterisk-users] RE: regcontext,NoOp extension > vanishes when extension reload > > > > > Let me guess: The

Hi All I have a bit of a strange one, and am not sure I''m doing this right. This is with 2.6.4 on Solaris 10 We want to create a sym link from a source file that is created by a package. If the package isn''t installed, puppet in noop is registering an error (big red in the dashboard) because it cannot stat the source file of the link. root@warbjohn# cat /tmp/symlink2.pp

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, I found an article about libvirt, and one thing that I have not seen anywhere else: > IMPORTANT: If you boot a Linux VM, you might want to add > “elevator=noop” to your Linux boot command line to force the disk > scheduler to let the host machine handle the disk writes > reorganisations (like tunnelling tcp over tcp, it

Hello everyone, I'm trying to send debugging messages to the console. However, although my system seems to be working fine, it does not seem to be printing the NoOp messages on the console... Are there any flags that prevent that to happen? BTW, how to log specific debug messages to a log file? Any suggestions? Thanks for your help, Leo

> so i confess i'm still not clear on what the first index into > getelementptr is all about. I'm sure you're not the only one. :) This is one of the wierdest aspects of LLVM to the unaccustomed. > it makes perfect sense for an example like > getelementptr %mystruct * %reg100 > to just return a %mystruct * equivalent to %reg100. > > it does *not* make sense to

In case anybody else has found their --noop flag (and probably others) ignored with 24.6 here''s why, and while this may be a known issue I didn''t find it in the discussion board after some searching so wanted to save others.. I can''t remember why it was done, but at some point I made puppetd.conf a symlink to puppet.conf. For whatever reason, this causes the flag to

2008/11/6 Steve Murphy <murf at digium.com> > On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 13:55 +0100, Olivier wrote: > > > > > Yes, you're right : NoOp needs verbosity of 3 and above. > > Thanks for helping. > > > > The surprising thing is that AEL Verbose prints output whatever the > > verbosity level is (even with 0). > > Would you qualify this as normal ?

The Wikipedia pages about schedulers are quite informative. I don't know _why_ this makes a difference, but it does seem to make a small one. Even though for a single process (guestfsd) it would seem that the choice of scheduler should make no difference. BTW the default scheduler in the guest is 'cfq'. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noop_scheduler http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFQ

so i confess i'm still not clear on what the first index into getelementptr is all about. it makes perfect sense for an example like getelementptr %mystruct * %reg100 to just return a %mystruct * equivalent to %reg100. it does *not* make sense to me that getelementptr %mystruct * %reg100, uint 0 should act the same. for look, what this speaks of to me is indexing the first element in an

Hey all, I could have sworn I saw it done once, and it seems to make perfect sense that someone might want to colour code the NoOp() lines so that the console logging messages stand out more. If anyone has done this and wouldn't mind sharing the secret, I'd be much appreciative! Thanks! Leif Madsen.