similar to: Polycom dhcp boot

Hi, I have a Polycom 501 that is currently unusable because I started a firmware and sip upgrade that I can't complete. The Ubuntu box address is set static at: 192.168.1.101. The phone address is set static at 192.168.1.51. The phone settings for the server menu are: Server Type: Trivial FTP Server Address: 192.168.1.101 Server User: PlcmSpIp Server Password: PlcmSpIp (not sure what it

When I try to boot my 501, it runs through the usual stuff, then stops with Config file error Error is 0x4020 and then reboots. The log on the FTP server shows: 0105164151|app1 |3|00|Bootline: ircaIP 0105164155|cfg |3|00|Image bootrom.ld has not changed. 0105164159|cfg |3|00|0004f202f803.cfg could not be downloaded, getting next file. 0105164206|cfg |3|00|Image sip.ld has not changed.

We are running a PBX box for our small company's phone system. There are two phones on our network that are not working though. When I reboot a phone that works correctly, like this (note 4907 is the phones extension): asterisk -rx "sip notify polycom-check-cfg 4907" It returns this: Sending NOTIFY of type 'polycom-check-cfg' to '4907' and the phone proceeds to

I am having an issue with doing FTP auto provisioning of Polycom 501's when they are behind a NAT. If I put the phone on the same subnet as the provision server it loads the configs and changes fine but as soon as I put in behind a NAT it comes up with cannot contact boot server. I have tried behind and replicated this behind a PIX 501, a Linksys SOHO router and a Motorolla SOHO router.

Xen-users, I have what I think is a bug in the serial console interaction of Xen and Ubuntu. Essentially, the serial console appears to work just fine until it is passed off to dom 0 from Xen. Then it stops communicating with dom0, but still communicates with Xen, if I use the control-A escape sequence. Google will not show me anything related to this. I have local RS-232 serial console working

Xen Users, Has anyone on the list been able to run Xen 4 on an Intel DX58S02 board? Sincerely, John McDermott ---- What is the formal meaning of the one-line program #include "/dev/tty" J.P. McDermott building 12 Code 5542 john.mcdermott@nrl.navy.mil Naval Research Laboratory voice: +1 202.404.8301 Washington, DC 20375, US fax: +1 202.404.7942

Hi, I'm having an issue where some phones behind a sonicwall are auto-congesting. The status on "sip show peer" shows ping times anywhere from 80ms all the way up to 1100ms. PCs behind the same firewall have a ping time of about 30ms to the PBX itself. Does anyone know if the sonicwall is inserting delay into the SIP signaling path and lagging the OPTIONS messages for qualify?

I've just started deploying these (well the T28P model) after years of Snom issues and they look pretty good (although the documentation is execrable; if you thought the Snom stuff was obtuse Yealink have got them knocked into a cocked hat!). Anyway, for provisioning I use HTTP with a DHCP entry like:- # # Yealink Phones # group { #

Hello, I have been trying to take the derivative of a quadratic B-spline obtained by using the COBS library. What I would like to do is similar to what one can do by using fit<-smooth.spline(cdf) xx<-seq(-10,10,.1) predict(fit, xx, deriv = 1) The goal is to fit the spline to data that is approximating a cumulative distribution function (e.g. in my example, cdf is a 2-column matrix with x

I am looking for a simple way to guarantee to each flow going through my traffic control point 1/numflows of bandwidth. I thought using SFQ would do this effectively but it appears to be quite unfair: a very high speed download that fills the pipe easily starves smaller flows to the point where it becomes unusable (especially if they are at all interactive) Because numflows is dynamic,

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:28:19 +0100 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > Am 04.03.19 um 21:18 schrieb Mark Foley via samba: > >> It shouldn't, you normally only have one gateway, it is by definition > >> the 'gateway' to the WAN & internet, so I would use the same one on all > >> your machines. > > > > The LAN host

I am running Samba 3.4.8 as a PDC on Solaris 10. I recently made this the WINS master- previously the BDC (Samba 3.0.37 on another Solaris 10 server.) I also use Sonicwall ipsec VPN for remote access (Windows XP clients.) The sonicwall client creates a virtual NIC on the client so that the client can have an IP address directly on the company LAN (ie. the same LAN as the samba

Recently the small business I work at replaced an aging linksys wrt style router with a SonicWall one. Ever since this change I have issues with this node falling back to TCP constantly. TCP for me ends up performing very sub-par, and most of the time unworkable. For some reason too the connection usually ends up being routed through another node. I created a new tinc instance using TAP

Hello Has anyone else run into a problem with dovecot pop3 and sonicwall? A week after switching to dovecot we had two local customers call and report they could no longer download emails with attachments. It turned out to be the email macro filter on the router. After the first report I thought maybe the customer had just changed something or it was a fluke, but then a day later we had the

Hi all, I currently have an Asterisk test server behind a TZ170 Sonicwall firewall / NAT box, with several DIDs. I've found that inbound IAX2 calls don't work reliably (i.e., I get a busy tone) unless I enable "Use Consistent NAT" in the Sonicwall. This feature is poorly documented by Sonicwall, so I thought I'd pass it along. Has anyone else run into this, or figured

Hi all, I have several locations, each connected by a Sonicwall VPN through PPPOE DSL, with Snom 360 phones. I've found that I have to tweak the Asterisk server MTU (inside one of the firewalls) to get everything to work "just right". Set the server MTU too low, and the Snom phones don't communicate correctly anymore. Too high and the phones work, but the server can't

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:31:07 +0000 From: Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 12:58:17 -0500 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 17:18:31 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 11:48:00 -0500 > > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >

Sonicwall now has "SIP transformations" check box in the Access section of the interface - does anyone know how to make sense of this function? Tech support is useless, and the help description is confusing. Using on office network to connect Grandstream and Cisco phones to asterisk PBX at remote location. I hate to use linksys or belkin, but they're (ironically) the only 2 that

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 17:18:31 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 11:48:00 -0500 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 14:50:38 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 09:15:12 -0500 > > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 14:50:38 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 09:15:12 -0500 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I have a rather strange and urgent problem. Last evening I installed > > a Sonicwall firewall between the Internet and office LAN. The only > > change that I know of for the LAN workstations was that the