similar to: How to avoid interruptions with DIGIUM

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "How to avoid interruptions with DIGIUM"

2015 Sep 23
3
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 14:09 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 11:12 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 17:55 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 16:31 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 23:10 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > > > Hi Ming & Co, > >
2015 Sep 23
3
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 14:09 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 11:12 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 17:55 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 16:31 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 23:10 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > > > Hi Ming & Co, > >
2008 Sep 17
7
Megaraid SAS driver failing in Xen-3.3.0 but was working in Xen-3.2.2-rc3
On Xen-3.3.0, domain0 Megaraid SAS (SAS 1068 controller) driver is not loading correctly if vtd support in Xen is enabled. It fails at the point of initializing firmware. I wasn''t seeing this error with Xen-3.2.2-rc3 (Unstable version), though with vtd disabled in Xen-3.3.0, it is working. Looks like a degrade problem. Any clues? Thx, Venkat
2015 Dec 01
2
[RFC PATCH 0/9] vhost-nvme: new qemu nvme backend using nvme target
> What do you think about virtio-nvme+vhost-nvme? What would be the advantage over virtio-blk? Multiqueue is not supported by QEMU but it's already supported by Linux (commit 6a27b656fc). To me, the advantage of nvme is that it provides more than decent performance on unmodified Windows guests, and thanks to your vendor extension can be used on Linux as well with speeds comparable to
2015 Dec 01
2
[RFC PATCH 0/9] vhost-nvme: new qemu nvme backend using nvme target
> What do you think about virtio-nvme+vhost-nvme? What would be the advantage over virtio-blk? Multiqueue is not supported by QEMU but it's already supported by Linux (commit 6a27b656fc). To me, the advantage of nvme is that it provides more than decent performance on unmodified Windows guests, and thanks to your vendor extension can be used on Linux as well with speeds comparable to
2010 Jul 07
2
Bug#588310: Xen enabled kernel cannot find the / partition
Package: xen-hypervisor-3.4-amd64 and linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 Version: 3.4.3-1 and 2.6.32-15 Hello all, GRUB-PC does not automatically populate Xen related parameters in /boot/grub/grub.cfg so I added them manually (see below). All the packages involved on my Dell PowerEdge R710 running Debian GNU/Linux Squeeze AMD64 are from the Squeeze repository. There are four (4) 1TB SATA HDD
2008 Nov 27
8
FW: megaraid sas driver failing in Xen-3.4 unstable version
A gentle reminder on this issue Please can any one help on this problem? ________________________________ From: Manyam, Ramesh Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 7:46 PM To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Subject: megaraid sas driver failing in Xen-3.4 unstable version On Xen-3.4 (unstable version), I have created CentOS HVM guest & WS2K8 HVM guest and dedicated MegaRAID SAS controller but
2015 Sep 17
1
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> wrote: > Hi Ming & Co, Hi Nic, > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 10:28 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: >> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: >> > > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to
2015 Sep 17
1
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> wrote: > Hi Ming & Co, Hi Nic, > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 10:28 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: >> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: >> > > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to
2011 Feb 11
1
write-back cache question
I have a perc5i (and perc5e) raid controller in my poweredge 2970 running centos 5.5. The RAID controller config is set for write-back policy, which I can confirm by checking in OpenManage. I also called Dell and ran their reporting application and had them double check to make sure everything looks OK hardware wise and they confirm that it does Yet when CentOS boots is appears to use the
2012 Oct 18
1
PCI device not properly reset after VFIO
Hi Alex, I've been playing around with VFIO and megasas (of course). What I did now was switching between VFIO and 'normal' operation, ie emulated access. megasas is happily running under VFIO, but when I do an emergency stop like killing the Qemu session the PCI device is not properly reset. IE when I load 'megaraid_sas' after unbinding the vfio_pci module the driver
2012 Oct 18
1
PCI device not properly reset after VFIO
Hi Alex, I've been playing around with VFIO and megasas (of course). What I did now was switching between VFIO and 'normal' operation, ie emulated access. megasas is happily running under VFIO, but when I do an emergency stop like killing the Qemu session the PCI device is not properly reset. IE when I load 'megaraid_sas' after unbinding the vfio_pci module the driver
2013 May 23
11
raid6: rmw writes all the time?
Hi all, we got a new test system here and I just also tested btrfs raid6 on that. Write performance is slightly lower than hw-raid (LSI megasas) and md-raid6, but it probably would be much better than any of these two, if it wouldn''t read all the during the writes. Is this a known issue? This is with linux-3.9.2. Thanks, Bernd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
2015 Sep 10
5
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, > > basically modified from virtio-blk and nvme code. > > > > As title said, request for your comments. > > > > Play it in Qemu with: > > -drive
2015 Sep 10
5
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, > > basically modified from virtio-blk and nvme code. > > > > As title said, request for your comments. > > > > Play it in Qemu with: > > -drive
2015 Sep 17
2
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 23:10 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > Hi Ming & Co, > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 10:28 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > > > > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, > > >
2015 Sep 17
2
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 23:10 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > Hi Ming & Co, > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 10:28 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > > > > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, > > >
2007 Sep 26
13
Nice chassis for ZFS server
Hi, I just came across this box [0] (McKay Creek). Seems to be exceptional building material for ZFS based NAS/iSCSI unit. I especially liked the two extra system disks hidden inside the box ! Any one have an experience with these ? [0] http://www.intel.com/design/servers/storage/ssr212mc2 -- Regards, Cyril
2015 Sep 18
3
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 17:55 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 16:31 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 23:10 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > Hi Ming & Co, > > > > > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 10:28 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > >
2015 Sep 18
3
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 17:55 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 16:31 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 23:10 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > Hi Ming & Co, > > > > > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 10:28 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > >