similar to: installing with yum

Hi. I've been working with Asterisk for a few month now with great results. I'm very happy with this product. I hope I can be of help in the future of this project. Right now I'm having some problems installing it in a new server. I wont bore you with details because finally the solution to my problem was clean and elegant and it came from a guy in a Linux mailing list. Here is my

Hello! I am running openSSH 2.9x on an IRIX 6.5.x platform. This was recently installed using SGI-supplied "freeware" binaries. I find that as time goes on, it takes more attempts to establish an ssh connection from the IRIX platform to another machine, as it fails with "not enough entropy in PRNG." I posted a note asking for assistance, and received a reply suggesting I

Dear Folks, I have been pounding my head against a wall trying to solve mulitiple problems trying to get SAMBA to work (Fedora core 2). Authentication was taking several minutes, and CUPS printing was problematic. I finally removed the Fedora distribution SAMBA binary, and installed the source (from the distribution). Recompiling solved the authentication problem (by excluding the PAM

Dear Samba folks, I have heard and seen nothing about this or matters like it since my posting, so I thought I would repost with some updates. My thinking at the moment is to try to recompile SAMBA (I am using a Fedora core 2 binary distribution) without PAM support, but I hate to do that. Here it is again: I very recently replaced our SGI Challenge S file server, which employed samba 2 to

Dear Samba Folks, Re the message I sent you earlier (reproduced below). The logs are also producing error messages such as this: smbd[12778]: pam_succeed_if: requirement "uid < 100" not met by user "bonomo" smbd[12821]: pam_succeed_if: requirement "uid < 100" not met by user "bonomo" smbd[12840]: pam_succeed_if: requirement "uid <

Dear Samba folks, I very recently replaced our SGI Challenge S file server, which employed samba 2 to service Windows boxes, with an Intel Linux box running Fedora core 2 Linux with samba 3.0.3. When I connect to the server, it takes a number of *minutes* to get an authentication challenge window. After entering name and password, the connection proceeds, and shares are displayed normally.

1. Subject. 2. asterisk16-1.6.2.6-1_centos5.src.rpm have not asterisk.logrotate in SOURCES 3. for "--without dahdi" diff SPECS/asterisk16-my.spec SPECS/asterisk16.spec 750a750 > %{_libdir}/asterisk/modules/res_timing_dahdi.so 879d878 < %{_libdir}/asterisk/modules/res_timing_dahdi.so

Hello, I've defined some new musiconhold classes in musiconhold.conf : [default] mode=files directory=/var/lib/asterisk/moh random=yes ; [908001] mode=files directory=/var/lib/asterisk/moh/908001 random=yes ; [101001-1] mode=files directory=/var/lib/asterisk/moh/101001/1 random=yes ; [101001-2] mode=files directory=/var/lib/asterisk/moh/101001/2 random=yes But the new classes never show up

Hello. Who can add asterisk16-xmpp module to packages.asterisk.org or build asterisk with support xmpp and update packages? Thank You. -- Vasiliy G Tolstov <v.tolstov at selfip.ru> Selfip.Ru

For those who are using SuSE: At last they've managed to create ready-to-run packages for openSUSE_11.1. They are there since a couple of hours... (For other versions it was allready available for some time on the OBS) /srv/distro/repo/network:/telephony:/asterisk/openSUSE_11.1/x86_64/asterisk16-devel-1.6.0.6-82.2.x86_64.rpm

Le 15/01/2020 à 19:24, Administrator a écrit : > Hi all, > > we face a strange behavior while connecting an Asterisk16 instance > with PJSIP to 2 providers: we receive error 401 Unauthorized, both of > them having Kamailio as front-end. With other providers -we don't know > if they run kamailio- registration is just fine. > > One of the provider took a pcap and told

On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 1:14 PM Administrator <admin at tootai.net> wrote: > > Le 17/01/2020 à 11:54, Administrator a écrit : > > > > Le 15/01/2020 à 19:24, Administrator a écrit : > >> Hi all, > >> > >> we face a strange behavior while connecting an Asterisk16 instance > >> with PJSIP to 2 providers: we receive error 401 Unauthorized,

Hi all, we face a strange behavior while connecting an Asterisk16 instance with PJSIP to 2 providers: we receive error 401 Unauthorized, both of them having Kamailio as front-end. With other providers -we don't know if they run kamailio- registration is just fine. One of the provider took a pcap and told us that expiration was set to 0 that's why they don't accept the

Le 17/01/2020 à 11:54, Administrator a écrit : > > Le 15/01/2020 à 19:24, Administrator a écrit : >> Hi all, >> >> we face a strange behavior while connecting an Asterisk16 instance >> with PJSIP to 2 providers: we receive error 401 Unauthorized, both of >> them having Kamailio as front-end. With other providers -we don't >> know if they run

Hi Guys, I have tested and isntalled Asterisk 1.6.2 with FreePBX from Digium repos based on this url: http://www.asterisk.org/downloads/yum BUT that doesn't seem to work with Fedora instance which I am running on Amazon Ec2. Apparently Asterisk 1.4 is natively included in Fedora repository but not Asterisk 1.6. And when I added the Digium repository, it give me a 404 not found. I check and

On 2020-01-15 11:24, Administrator wrote: 8<'s > One of the provider took a pcap and told us that expiration was set to 0 > that's why they don't accept the registration. We took a pcap on our > side when SIP packet goes out of our server and we see that the > expiration parameter is setted to 3600 ! Howdy, Maybe the clipping of your SIP packet is occurring on

On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 10:45 AM Administrator <admin at tootai.net> wrote: <snip> > It become stranger and stranger: on one of the register peer we receive in > asterisk: > > *CLI> [2020-01-19 15:23:18] WARNING[17469]: > res_pjsip_outbound_registration.c:1021 handle_registration_response: Fatal > response '401' received from

Le 19/01/2020 à 00:31, Joshua C. Colp a écrit : > On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 1:14 PM Administrator <admin at tootai.net > <mailto:admin at tootai.net>> wrote: > > > Le 17/01/2020 à 11:54, Administrator a écrit : > > > > Le 15/01/2020 à 19:24, Administrator a écrit : > >> Hi all, > >> > >> we face a strange

Le 15/01/2020 à 19:50, C.Maj a écrit : > On 2020-01-15 11:24, Administrator wrote: > > 8<'s > >> One of the provider took a pcap and told us that expiration was set to 0 >> that's why they don't accept the registration. We took a pcap on our >> side when SIP packet goes out of our server and we see that the >> expiration parameter is setted to

Hi Everyone, I have done "yum install speex libspeex-devel speex-devel" and it was succesful on CentOS. I then tried "yum install asterisk16 asterisk16-addons asterisk16-configs" but "core show translation" doesn't show speex loaded. Is there a way to or an option that I can append to the asterisk install to make sure it compiles with speex in mind? Thanks,