similar to: asterisk compatible cards?

Hey all, I''m not sure if this is a ZFS bug or a hardware issue I''m having - any pointers would be great! Following contents include: - high-level info about my system - my first thought to debugging this - stack trace - format output - zpool status output - dmesg output High-Level Info About My System --------------------------------------------- - fresh

so, i use vpopmail to auth my users,but after upgrading from dovecot-0.99.14-r1 to dovecot-1.0_alpha5 and tweaking dovecot.conf i get this in the log : dovecot: Dec 15 12:12:11 Info: auth(default): client in: AUTH 1 PLAIN service=POP3 lip=81.xx.xx.xx rip=81.xx.xx.xx resp= dovecot: Dec 15 12:12:11 Info: auth(default): client out: CONT 1 dovecot: Dec 15 12:12:11 Info:

As the issue concerns both the -user (configuration) and -devel (OOPS), I''m sending this message to both lists. Some time ago I complained about two problems: - VLANs are not working on machines with 100 Mbit cards - I get a kernel Oops (sometimes panic) when I try to use bonding and VLANs with Xen The root of the issue is the same in both cases: VLAN interfaces must *not* be

As the issue concerns both the -user (configuration) and -devel (OOPS), I''m sending this message to both lists. Some time ago I complained about two problems: - VLANs are not working on machines with 100 Mbit cards - I get a kernel Oops (sometimes panic) when I try to use bonding and VLANs with Xen The root of the issue is the same in both cases: VLAN interfaces must *not* be

Hi, i have a question if linux is able to do the same thing that commercial wan simulators do (which cost 7000 $ or more). Basicly i want to use the following setup. Linux Router Machine 192.168.0.1 192.168.1.1 Eth0 192.168.10.1 Eth5 192.168.2.1 Eth1 192.168.100.1 WEB Server. 192.168.3.1 Eth2

I'm running rsync via ssh on two machines connected with 100 Mbit/s Ethernet cards (at high speed) via a Linksys switch. It's all right here in a single closet. I'm sending large files (initial transfer, nothing preexists on the destination machine) and seeing transfer rates in the 2 Mbit/s range. The CPUs on both machines are more than 90% idle, and I upped the --block-size to 256

i upgraded dovecot from 0.99 to the last version and it doesnt seem to work anymore.. im using vpopmail userdb and i get this in the logs : dovecot: Dec 18 03:42:08 Info: auth(default): client in: AUTH 1 PLAIN service=POP3 lip=81.x.x.x rip=81.x.x.x resp= dovecot: Dec 18 03:42:08 Info: auth(default): client out: CONT 1 dovecot: Dec 18 03:42:08 Info: auth(default): client in: CONT 1

Who mentioned fax? :-) Native CAPI isn't an option for us (unfortunately), as our service is a point-to-point service, which the AVM CAPI drivers don't support. We've now got another problem -- we're now able to make calls -- once. The kernel panics as soon as someone terminates a call (and, so it would seem, at various other times too). This has only been occuring since mISDN

Hi Guys Just a quick question regarding on the 501, has anyone been able to configure the transfer button and messaging buttons to work with asterisk? Can you share a configuration to do this? Thanks in advance. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060301/df504eef/attachment.htm

Hi, i''ve following problem. One of our gateway router, which connects some of our customers should have bandwith limit. So customer A with IP XX should have 2 Mbit, customer B with IP YY should have 10 Mbit. There is no need of borrowing bandwith so no fairness needed. My simple question: with which technique should I manage this shaping? Or is there any existing project which

Hi, any pointer on how to debug this: [ 19.741005] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0541 -> 0543) [ 19.741095] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: Using 32-bit DMA via iommu [ 19.741165] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: NVIDIA GP108 (138000a1) [ 19.752562] tg3 0004:01:00.0 enP4p1s0f0: renamed from eth0 [ 19.832879] [drm] Initialized ast 0.1.0 20120228 for 0005:02:00.0 on minor 0 [ 19.856391] nouveau

Hello everyone, I''m a newbie experimenting with CBQ shaping and am facing a few problems. Can any of you please help? TEST SETUP: +---------------+ +----------------+ | 10.0.0.103 |----------->| 10.0.0.102 | +---------------+ +----------------+ 10.0.0.103: Linux, 100Mbit/s NIC 10.0.0.102: Windows, 100Mbit/s NIC, iperf tcp server (ports 2000 and 2001) WHAT I

Hopefully this is not too off topic. I have a server in which I'm creating an Exchange Information Store backup using ntbackup. The .bkf file it creates is 112GB. My goal was first to rsync it over to a local linux server, and then rsync just the changes over the internet to another linux server. I do this with other Exchange .bkf files (in the 4GB to 20GB range) and it seems to work well

Author: anish Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 7c4fe5bc3d340613b336f2b91002d33d0010a403 Log message: 6360419 get master aborts accessing config space of amd64 hostbridge devices on systems with CK8-04 device Files: update: usr/src/uts/i86pc/io/pci/pci.c update: usr/src/uts/i86pc/io/pci/pci_common.c update: usr/src/uts/i86pc/io/pci/pci_common.h update:

Author: anish Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: ebc37fd690a4ad2a9f05ea88e4a73c9438c20b86 Log message: 6420136 After Solaris installation and reboot to login screen, host is wedged... Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/os/ddi_intr_impl.c update: usr/src/uts/common/sys/ddi_intr_impl.h update: usr/src/uts/i86pc/io/pci/pci_common.c update: usr/src/uts/i86pc/io/pciex/pcie_ck804_boot.c

Does anyone know if the Dell Power Edge 1900 has an issue with multiport E1 cards? We've had this server running for a while now with 2 E1 cards. At first we tried to install an Openvox D210P card with two E1 ports but after a couple of kernel panics we thought that maybe the card was defective and we replaced it with two Digium TE120P cards. Now the customer needs a third E1 port and

Hi all, We are using Tinc 2.0.22 as a layer 2 VPN between nodes over the Internet. We are experiencing very slow network speed using Tinc. Between 2 nodes, we have 150 Mbit/s network speed without Tinc (public IPv4 to public IPv4 using iperf), and only 3 Mbit/s using Tinc (private IPv4 to private IPv4). Here is the configuration of Tinc we use : AddressFamily = ipv4 BindToInterface = vmbr1

Hello, I have a serious problem with HTB which I wasn''t able to solve myself. I run a masquerading router with ppp0 as interface to the Internet. Three clients need to share a downstream of 1 MBit, which I want to divide with tc. When I see a packet being forwarded to one of these clients, I give it the appropriate unique mark: iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -d 192.168.34.141 -j MARK

Hello, hope this isn't too far offtopic here but being a troller for a long time here I've realized there is a great knowledge base so I wanted to at least see if i could get some tips. I help run a small colocation company in California and I am in the middle of recommending a new 'core router' platform for our network. We offer mainly colo and dedicated servers, and several of

Buenas, tengo 30 000 000 de datos, y el R no me deja trabajar, como podria corregir eso problema para trabajar con los 30 000 000, mintras es estoy trabajando cada 1 000 000 pero no es igual. Espero puedan ayudarme saludos -- Manuel Bonilla