similar to: Please test: STUN patch for Asterisk behind NAT

Hi, I am trying to register SIP clients which are behind NAT on different network. In order to achieve this goal I think I need STUN Server . I downloaded STUN Server from http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/stun/stund_0.96_Aug13.tgz But I don't know how to install/configure it. And please advice me that STUN server is good idea for this scenario? Thanks in advance Wazb

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040715/b37cee4b/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- ? Hi friends I have some doubt in connecting my firefly3rd party softphone from windows machine to asterisk server in linux . My asterisk is behind the "Port Restricted NAT". I am using STUN server to cross the

Guys. Im reading a lot about ser, nat, stun, etc. And I noticed there are a lot of ways to get around nat but I would like to hear some success stories about handling nat users with multiple voip phones behind nat. I have my asterisk box behind but ports are forwarded (5060 5004 10000-20000 for rtp and 4569 for iax2) but still.. I can quite figure out what ser and stund have to do on this

I'm wondering if anyone can recommend one over the other. I'm mostly interested in running open source solutions, so I would prefer if your recommendations are within the open source arena. Basically, I contemplated the idea of using SER as a NAT Helper and possibly as a SIP server for a portion of our user base. We prefer to have Asterisk in the mix because of the additional

Hi, I'm trying to configure Sipura 2000 (behind NAT) which connects to Asterisk (public IP, no NAT) and having interesting results. When Sipura is behind Linux/NAT firewall it works great and no special NAT settings on Sipura are necessary. The issue I'm having is when Sipura is behind Linksys broadband NAT router. Sipura gets registered with Asterisk just fine, but I can't hear

I've got my asterisk server in the DMZ of my local LAN - I've used my Budgetone and GXP2000's from the Internet- on direct IP connections with no problems. However, I'm about to deploy about 5 phones (either budgetone or GXP2000's) all on a LAN behind a NAT- on a different network than the Asterisk server. Should I look into using STUN servers? Will this setup be a

Does anybody have a good link how to connect Sipura with Asteriks, both behind NAT? I'm using FWD but their connection is like a weather (especially IAX), I need something more reliable. I was thinking of using stun and/or proxy but can not find any good link explaining how to setup Linux server -- #Joseph

> Joshua Colp wrote: > > There should be nothing different, except for how you configure things. > What is the full PJSIP configuration? What is the environment where > Asterisk is running? Is ICE actually in use on the other side? What is > the full SIP trace? > The full configuration is here: http://pastebin.com/XqZG1m5X I am connection over TLS / SRTP on port 5063. When

I decided to give the whole family IP phones for christmas, all hooked into my asterisk server, so all the nephews can have their own lines. However, one of the phones I got was the SNOM 200. That's worked fine for me on my own network, but I'm having bad luck getting it to work behind NAT talking to Asterisk. It talks to my termination/origination provider, which seems to ruthlessly

Hi, I know this is slightly off topic but I figured the knowlege here is probably the best on the subject.. I want to setup remote offices with 4 to 6 SIP phones (SNOM 200) using ADSL and the internet to connect to the Asterisk box.. These phone will be behind an ADSL router using NAT... I don't want to setup another Asterisk system in each office so IAX is not an option.. I could use

I have two phones, one does not need stun, the other one needs. All settings are identically, except the number/password and said above stun - not stun I use codec in the order: g729 g711u g711a Any ideas, why the user can hear me, but I cannot hear him (stun) while the other user without stun has no problem. bye Ronald

I have been trying out several stun servers with Asterisk 1.6.0.9 and 1.6.1.0 and I keep getting the following message: [May 26 12:26:35] WARNING[16174]: chan_sip.c:2695 ast_sip_ouraddrfor: stun failed [May 26 12:26:35] WARNING[16174]: chan_sip.c:2695 ast_sip_ouraddrfor: stun failed [May 26 12:26:35] WARNING[16174]: chan_sip.c:2695 ast_sip_ouraddrfor: stun failed [May 26 12:26:35] WARNING[16174]:

HI all! I'm looking for some infos to configure stun server support for a SIP peer. I've installed Asterisk 1.4.3, but searching for stun support in chan_sip (sip.conf) i've found nothing, only a "misterious" externip = stun... But where i have to put the ip of stun server? No infos around Google and forum! :-) Thank all, regards -- Marco Ciacci Asterisk Admin Windows

Hi all, Love tinc by the way. It's a great VPN. I'm having issues with 2 nodes always talking through an intermediate node. My set up is a VPS in a cloud somewhere that's running tinc and 2 other nodes - one a roaming laptop (always NAT'd) and the other a server behind a dynamic IP home broadband connection (Not NAT'd but firewalled). Neither the laptop nor the home

At 7:36 PM +0200 on 5/22/04, Olle E. Johansson wrote: >>[snip] >Sending NOTIFY to Asterisk is an error, but a workaround. Since Asterisk >can handled the NAT traversal all by itself with Qualify (as John points >out) disabling the NOTIFY will not change anything. > >The NOTIFY will in no way affect the status - unreachable/reachable. > >Another problem with the SIPURA is

I have an asterisk 13 server behind NAT on a dynamic IP Address. It is running the PJSIP Stack It is registering to another asterisk 13 server that is on a Static IP outside of the firewall at a different location (also on the PJSIP Stack). How do we implement STUN/ICE on the server behind the dynamic Address. It does not appear to be registering properly without knowing the NAT pubic

Not sure if it's alright to talk about this here??? compiled the STUN server from Vovida on RedHat 7.3. Looks simple to configure. It isn't starting...it tries to for a long time and then just craps out. Here is my config:/etc/sysconfig/stund #!/bin/echo Not to execute. # Path to stund STUND=/usr/sbin/stund # Set the required args for STUND STUNDPRIMARYHOSTNAME=208.x.x.x # The hostname

Sipura does include STUN as an option. It has for quite some time. We are using it with all of our Sipuras behind NAT'd gateways and it works great! Try upgrading to the latest Sipura firmware rev. Darren Nay > -----Original Message----- > From: John Todd [mailto:jtodd@loligo.com] > Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 1:57 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject:

Hi, I've followed the guide at: http://blogs.operationaldynamics.com/andrew/software/research/using-tinc-vpn and have a working tinc VPN. Here's my topology: - CentralNode has a fixed public IP address that everyone connects to - Leaf1 and Leaf2 may have different IP addresses depending on where they are, and usually those will be behind NAT (think, two laptops going around and you get

What is the best solution? I dont want to have modify firewall's at all or do port fowarding. Ideally I would like a solution that with either a softphone or wireless hardphone one could connect via friends, family, or hotspots without reconfiguring their devices. What are people using? STUN? SER? Thanks in advance! -blake -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was