similar to: Exchange UM Play on Phone

Can anyone tell me what might be going on here? Thanks in advance David : Jan 9 22:02:15 dns1 winbindd[19219]: [2010/01/09 22:02:15, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:smb_register_idmap_alloc(201) Jan 9 22:02:15 dns1 winbindd[19219]: idmap_alloc module tdb already registered! Jan 9 22:02:15 dns1 winbindd[19219]: [2010/01/09 22:02:15, 0] winbindd/idmap.c:smb_register_idmap(149) Jan 9 22:02:15 dns1

Hi I'm trying to make a Linux server (RHEL 5.3) join my company's ADS domain. The company's domain is built from serveral kerberos realms and Windows domain. the Linux FQDN resolves to the name of one of the kerberos realms we have, but I was asked to to have the linux server join a different kerberos realm and windows Domain. When I attempt to run the command: 'net ads join -U

Now I have a some time to answer, maybe a few of your questions. Am 26.02.19 um 20:59 schrieb lists via samba: > Hi, > > No replies unfortunately. Unsure why. There are still a lot of questions open and I think a lot of things have to be done. > > We searched the list, and we found little discussion on the subject of > trusts. We see occasional questions, but they are often

Dear List, I?m trying to figure out *memory page sharing***using HVM on Xen 4.0.1, but I?m not really able to find some useful information or sources about this issue. I just found two links porviding these sources: http://knol.google.com/k/learning-grant-tables http://blog.chinaunix.net/space.php?uid=20286427&do=blog&id=109114 Both are not working.. I think they are made for an older

Hi, Having read the release notes on the status of trusts within samba, we see for 4.9 > "improved support for trusted domains" but we also always see these messages: > "Both sides of the trust need to fully trust each other!" and > "DCs of domain A can grant domain admin rights in domain B" What we would like to achieve is a one-way incoming trust

There was a discussion a while ago about adding inheritance to definitions. There is a need for a way to specialize parameters while allowing passing other options. This comes up with remotefile where it would be nice to have a default server location but not specify all the parameters (and their defaults) in the definition. Was there a change to the syntax? Is there a way to accomplish this?

Thanks everybody! The sudden burst of help (both on- and offlist) is much appreciated. :-) I'll get back to my test setup next week, and try again with these new insights. MJ On 2/28/19 3:46 PM, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hai Maurik-Jan, > > Stefan's work can be found here, i'm reading it myself and its really good. > >

I don't completely understand this.. Lemme try it out.. [default] exten => 1112223333,1,Macro(happy-did) [macro-happy-did] exten => s,1,Goto(${MACRO_EXTEN},1) exten => _XXXXXXXXXX,1,NoOp(Normal "s" exten stuff here) So when this is ran it will cut the cdr and the s will show the actual DID not the s correct? But then the NoOp would be something like: ....

Hello. I'm having trouble with callerid on outgoing calls. The recipient of the call only sees "unknown" rather than the number I'm specifying. If I set callerid info when calling an internal extension then I see the callerid name and number when I call that extension. I did that thusly: exten => 101,1,Set(CALLERID(number)=1112223333) exten =>

Hi, No replies unfortunately. Unsure why. We searched the list, and we found little discussion on the subject of trusts. We see occasional questions, but they are often left unanswered, like this one. If someone could point us to some good up-to-date docs on trusts with samba then we would really appreciate it. We setup a test environment (one samba 4.9.4 testad2 AD, one native windows

Hi Stefan, Thanks for your input. I'll check the dns stuff. I put resolvers for both domains as primary and secondary on both machines, but I guess that's not good enough. I'll look into setting up a (query logging) dns proxy, that should tell us at least who is asking what. Any chance to share that (german) article you wrote? My german is not perfect, but good enough to

We have several customers we need to place outbound calls for (in a single system). May have to place calls for thousands of different caller ids. Customer signs a contract guaranteeing the caller id they provide is owned by them. I have everything setup for AMI Originate and can place the calls. However, I'm encountering a problem with the caller id. The system I'm dialing through

Asterisk 12.5 I'm using AMI to initiate a "call me now" feature from the web site. The AMI looks like: Action: Originate Channel: Local/s at callmenow Context: dial-to-customer Exten: s Priority: 1 Async: true Variable: CHANNEL_TO_CUSTOMER=SIP/voipms/1112223333 Timeout: 999999 Dial Plan: [callmenow] exten => s,1,NoOp(callmenow: Queue without answer) same

Hai Maurik-Jan, Stefan's work can be found here, i'm reading it myself and its really good.

I'm looking into the dialplan specifics: tleilax:~ # tleilax:~ # cat /etc/asterisk/extensions.conf [general] static=yes writeprotect=no [globals] CONSOLE=Console/dsp ; Console interface for demo TRUNK=DAHDI/r1 ; Trunk interface TRUNKX=DAHDI/r2 ; 2nd trunk interface TRUNKIAX=IAX2/ASTtest1:test at 10.10.10.16:4569 ; IAX trunk

Hi Stefan I am also one of the Sernet customer. Can you guide me how to run the patch to fix the bug. I am running 2 DC's Sernet Samba 4.7.4 with 2 RODC's running Sernet Samba 4.7.4. Whenever I run samba-tool drs replicate --fix --yes command on the DC it shows the below errors which cannot be fixed: Failed to remove deleted DN attribute fromServer : (65, "objectclass_attrs: at

Hi MJ, Am 28.02.2019 15:31, schrieb mj via samba: > Hi Stefan, > > Thanks for your input. I'll check the dns stuff. I put resolvers for > both domains as primary and secondary on both machines, but I guess > that's not good enough. > NO, it's not good enough ;-) Setting up a DNS-Proxy is real easy. Just a few lines :-). > I'll look into setting up a (query

These patches add a test device, useful to measure speed of MMIO versus PIO, in different configurations. As I didn't want to reserve a hardcoded range of memory, I added pci device for this instead. Used together with the kvm unittest patches I posted on kvm mailing list. To use, simply add the device on the pci bus. Example test output: vmcall 1519 .... outl_to_kernel 1745

These patches add a test device, useful to measure speed of MMIO versus PIO, in different configurations. As I didn't want to reserve a hardcoded range of memory, I added pci device for this instead. Used together with the kvm unittest patches I posted on kvm mailing list. To use, simply add the device on the pci bus. Example test output: vmcall 1519 .... outl_to_kernel 1745

Hi Stefan, others, Just to report back that things work very nicely now that DNS is using one dns proxy that resolves both AD domains. I am testing now with a 'full' two-way trust, and everyhing seemed to work, including the tests from samba-tool and from windows "domains and trusts" perspective. From an administrative point of view, the fact that your have to add