similar to: Reinvite to alaw after T.38 reception

Does the application PGSQL has been removed from Asterisk? Couldn't find it on Asterisk source and addons. Atenciosamente, Vin?cius Fontes Gerente de Seguran?a da Informa??o Canall Tecnologia em Comunica??es Passo Fundo - RS - Brasil +55 54 2104-7000 Information Security Manager Canall Tecnologia em Comunica??es Passo Fundo - RS - Brazil +55 54 2104-7000

Hello everyone. I'm struggling to get T.38 faxing to work in Asterisk 1.6.1.13 with a SIP DID provider here in Brazil (GVT - Vox IP service). Here's my scenario: When faxes arrive by a specific DID, they are routed thru this simple macro: [macro-recebefax] exten => s,1,Set(DB(fax/count)=$[${DB(fax/count)} + 1]) exten => s,n,Set(FAXCOUNT=${DB(fax/count)}) exten =>

I'm playing around with an ALIX 2D2 board (http://www.pcengines.ch/alix2d2.htm). It's a fanless, x86 system using an AMD Geode processor with 256MB of RAM. Also available are two network interfaces, two USB ports and one serial port (no keyboard or VGA). I'm using the Voyage Linux distro, which basically is Debian Lenny optimized for this board. Asterisk 1.6.1.12 runs fine on the

This message is pointed directly to Steve Underwood. I tought it would not be nice to directly email him with a question that interests a good part of the Asterisk community, so here it is. :) Steve, remember a few days ago when we discussed about issues on Asterisk 1.6.1.13 and T.38 fax reception? Well I opened an issue on Mantis (https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16756) and turns out it

I have a partial form "empresa". In new.rhtml of "empresa", I call the partial form of "usuario". Well, it is happening the following: When save empresa, and stop in validates, as much in "empresa" how much "usuario", appear only error message of "empresa", and not of "usuario". Because this happening? ps1.: I use flash_message

Hi, We have tried upgrading from 1.6.1.14 to 1.6.2.9 and have found that we are unable to URI dial our clients. We run a multi-tenant server and have set sip.conf to forward calls to a public context based on incoming domain name. This was all working before but not it is complaining of a loop back as the source and target server are the same. Any ideas on how to overcome this problem as we dial

Hi, I am attempting to change my dialplan to use 'n' priorities and labels for easier reading, and less re-numbering :) but how do you handle the plus 101 ? In my extensions.conf I have a simple plan for testing :- [inbound-sip] exten => uxbod,1,Dial(sip/1001,20,t) exten => uxbod,n,PlayBack(uxbod) exten => uxbod,n,VoiceMail(1001@voicemail,s) exten => uxbod,n,Hangup() exten

Hi, Asterisk Version : 1.2.15 Card : TDM11B (1 x FXO , 1 x FXS) I have internal dialling working okay SIP->ZAP (analogue phone) and ZAP (analogue phone) -> SIP. The problem comes when I try and make a outbound call. Here is my extensions.conf :- Code: [incoming] exten => s,1,GoToIfTime(17:00-09:00\mon-fri\*\*?outofhours|s,1) exten => s,2,GoToIfTime(*\sat-sun\*\*?outofhours|s,1)

We still have some tickets available for the Women in Compilers and Tools reception that is held the night before the 2018 Euro LLVM Developers’ Meeting in Bristol, UK. Tickets are available here. https://www.eventbrite.com/e/2018-european-llvm-developers-meeting-women-in-compilers-and-tools-reception-tickets-42287427835 This is an evening reception on April 15th that includes dinner, drinks,

I think I have seen a post about that before. But can't find it again Can some people light me up with the detail -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060228/a0f18b39/attachment.htm

Hey, all. I've got a client who's interested in possibly using a softphone for his receptionists. While I've certainly used some softphones for single extensions, I'm not sure which one I'd suggest for a receptionist. Any favorites? Thanks, -Ken

Hi, all. I'm getting a lot of [Feb 3 13:56:36] WARNING[3721] /usr/src/asterisk/spandsp/agx-ast-addons/app_rxfax.c: Channel T30 DONE < 0. in my log file, and incomplete fax reception. Any idea what might be going on? I've googled a fair bit, but haven't seen anything leap out at me. Thanks, -Ken

Hi all, I am searching some lightweight tool to control when rsyslog didn't receive events from a specific host or group of hosts for x minutes/seconds. Only a simple tool to send an email when an alert is triggered, I don't need flat tools like zabbix or similars. Does anyone know any?

> From: "John Hughes" <john at calva.com> > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List, Non-Commercial Discussion" > <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> > Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 2:10:45 AM > Subject: [asterisk-users] I can do alaw, ulaw and gsm; remote can do g729 and > alaw; asterisk wants to translate g729 -> alaw. WHY? > I am having a

Hi all, we face a problem with SMS reception sended to _landlines_, at least in France. Normally operators -tested with France Telecom and SFR- are sending voice SMSs from a particular CID number, so no problem. But today we discover that -at least SFR- send from time to time voice SMSs with original callerID which means that the call is terminated like a normal call and not recognized as

On 14/05/2020 08:10, John Hughes wrote: > > I am having a problem with one of my callers who is using either g729 > or alaw.  I can do alaw but not g729 so asterisk should negotiate alaw > right?  In fact from the sip debug it looks like it does, but then I > get the dreaded "channel.c:5630 set_format: Unable to find a codec > translation path: (g729) -> (alaw)"

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:31 AM John Hughes <john at calva.com> wrote: > On 14/05/2020 08:10, John Hughes wrote: > > I am having a problem with one of my callers who is using either g729 or > alaw. I can do alaw but not g729 so asterisk should negotiate alaw right? > In fact from the sip debug it looks like it does, but then I get the > dreaded "channel.c:5630

I'm getting lots of grief from reviewers about figures generated with the envfit function in the Vegan package. Has anyone else struggled to effectively explain this analysis? If so, can you share any helpful tips? The most recent comment I've gotten back: "What this shows is which NMDS axis separates the communities, not the relationship between the edaphic factor and the

Hello! Client is using ulaw, however server sometimes fills the log with following: [2011-03-09 21:23:07] WARNING[27204] chan_sip.c: Asked to transmit frame type slin, while native formats is 0x8 (alaw) read/write = 0x4 (ulaw)/0x8 (alaw) [2011-03-09 21:23:07] WARNING[27204] chan_sip.c: Asked to transmit frame type slin, while native formats is 0x8 (alaw) read/write = 0x4 (ulaw)/0x8 (alaw)

The other end is sending g729 even though it was not negotiated. The other end should not do this and it usually seems that the other ends that do send g729. This was recently fixed. See https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-28139 Richard On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 1:11 AM John Hughes <john at calva.com> wrote: > I am having a problem with one of my callers who is using