similar to: Pri show span and PtMP mode

We are seeing the message " PRI Error on span 1: Received MDL/TEI management message, but configured for mode other than PTMP" on one of our Asterisk boxes on a PRI. A Google search turns up a number of hits for this error, but they are all for BRI not PRI. I'm reasonably sure there are no recent updates or config changes. Running Asterisk 1.4.37. We can update to 1.4.44 if it

Hi all, So, we reverted the LibPRI version and tested it, and then tried with the latest version of everything. Still no changes. The BRI line is in PTMP. If we set the configs to PTMP in the genconf_parameters and try it, we get the following: [Jan 21 17:32:20] ERROR[20341]: chan_dahdi.c:12645 dahdi_pri_error: Unable to receive TEI from network! If we set it to PTP (which it is not) we

Hi, My setup is: IPPhone1 --- Asterisk1 with B410P ---- Patton 4638 --- Asterisk2 --- IPPhone2 I want to evaluate Asterisk1 in TE/PtmP mode. So, Patton box is configured in NT/PtmP (with 3 BRI links between both systems). Anyway, asterisk -rx "pri show spans" keeps replying : PRI span 1/0: Provisioned, Down, Active PRI span 2/0: Provisioned, Down, Active PRI span 3/0: Provisioned,

Hi, As you may know, these ISDN BRI features are very important here in Europe as ISDN Basic Rate Access is very popular among Small & Medium Entreprises. I don't really know why but it seems that in many countries, default is to install small PBX using Point-to-Multipoint (PtMP) mode as opposed to Point-to-Point (PtP) which is the norm for PRI. So basically, in several countries, SME

Hi, Reading http://www.asteriskguru.com/tutorials/bri.html , it seems PtP is the way to connect businesses but if you read http://public.swbell.net/ISDN/connect.html you would think the opposite. Can anyone elaborate a bit PtP or PtmP respective advantages ? Cheers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, In my lab, I'm testing BRI spans in NT/ptmp mode. My setup is: asterisk 11.2.1 libpri 1.4.14 dahdi 2.6.1 wctdm24xxp (HA8 hybrid with B400M) SIP phone <----> Asterisk with HA8 <----> Patton SN4638 <----> Asterisk <----> SIP phone The single BRI line I'm testing remains down: CLI> pri show spans PRI span 1/0: In Alarm, Up, Active I'm quite certain this

Hello all Asterisk 1.2.10 BRIstuff PRE-1s Debian sarge I have an issue with my ISDN-BRI line. Asterisk tells me my D-Channel is down, no matter is I have an actual line plugged in or not. == Primary D-Channel on span 1 down I somehow got it to work once! The config tools do not indicate any errors whatsoever. Here is a rundown of various listings I can think about. (some things may show

Hi Folks, I've Asterisk Bristuffed up and running behind an Auerswald Commander Basic ISDN PBX on the internal ISDN Bus (BRI/PTMP). The HFC Card works marvelleous for outgoing calls (as the parallely installed avm fritzcard with chan_capi does), but when I'm trying to call in, I get a short ring signal and then the connection is terminated. This does not happen with chan_capi and

Hi, After an upgrade, I discovered yesterday strange things I would like to share here. Basically, I'me comparing platforms: The first one is a 2.6.26 (Debian Lenny) platform, with Asterisk 1.6.1.18, Libpri 1.4.10.2, Dahdi revision 8853 (must be between 2.3 and 2.5, I think). The second one is a 2.6.32 (Debian Squeeze) platform, with Asterisk 10.5.1, Libpri 1.4.12, Dahdi 2.6.1. Both are

Hi, I've read that the new dahdi channel supporting B410P doesn't support PtmP when in NT mode. Does it support PtmP when in TE mode ? Cheers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20081209/f422b5d0/attachment.htm

connecting legacy PBX to Asterisk (for the very same reason, those PBX use TE-PTMP). If others could join this thread and say if they agree or not with NT-PTMP being the 2nd most needed mode, would be great. Please, do not hesitate to comment. > > > Right now, I would not preclude the possibility that NT-PTMP support > might be added, but I could not give you a concrete time at which

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, i'm in debian sid 3.1 with kernel 2.6.7, * last cvs & chan_capi 0.3.4b; nt1+ with 2 bri in ptmp (http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=DDI) i tried to install avm c4 following step by step http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20How%20to%20connect%20with%20CAPI step 1. i compiled capi 2.0 support in kernel

Hi, I am struggling to get plain Cologne chip cards to run in NT mode, runs nice in TE mode despite the error message: login as: root root at 192.168.2.22's password: Last login: Tue Sep 1 23:09:24 2009 from 192.168.2.50 Welcome to Elastix ---------------------------------------------------- misdnportinfo Port 1: TE-mode BRI S/T interface line (for phone lines) -> Protocol: DSS1

Hello list We're trying to get a HFC card running in NT mode. Zaphfc loads fine as module and ztcfg -v is run only once per reboot. Cabling is ok, the ISDN-TE gets ist power fine. The HFC card does not share any interupts. After the TE picks up the console (pri debug enabled) shows: Nov 21 18:42:20 NOTICE[13326]: chan_zap.c:7169 pri_dchannel: PRI got event: 6 on Primary D-channel of span 1

Hi, I need to rebuild a system which has 4 BRI ports and is connected to Point-to-multiPoint lines, in a country where telco often "drop lines for energy savings". I'm planning to use latest 11.4.0 asterisk version along with dahdi and libpri (no misdn). Which version are recommended for Dahdi and Libpri ? My main requirements are, beside having calls coming in and out: - keep a

Now that's quite interesting - yes, this is a two way span. I thought that the D-channel negotiation that happens before the B-channel is set up would have implicitly avoid the glare condition through signalling the intent-to-use to the resource to the remote end (a-la E&M wink start). So what seems to be happening in my case is my CPE is set for a 'Descending' b channel sequence

So the bottom is : NT PtmP works with Dahdi 2.5 and Asterisk 1.8 ! Though I can't check this by myself at the moment, I'm adding a SOLVED note in this reply to let others be aware, just in case. Thanks for replying ! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello, I've got a running system in which logs are full of messages such as: [Jun 10 07:24:14] NOTICE[2414] chan_dahdi.c: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 2 The strange thing is those messages are coming from a single span. My setup is : Asterisk 1.6.1.18 Junghanns OctoBRI with wcb4xxp driver libpri 1.4.10.2 dahdi 2.3.0 3 BRI lines in PtMP mode What does this

Have you got termination set correctly? I have a B410P working with 2 x NT and 2 x TE ports successfully. I had to turn the 100ohm termination on on the NT ports (even though I have them set as PTP in mISDN.conf). HTH -->> -----Original Message----- -->> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- -->> bounces at lists.digium.com] On

I have a serious problem that repeats very often, after 30 - 50 calls and I can only solve it by stopped and restarting * :-( After a while, * seems to loose track of something. When an ISDN call from PBX needs to go to the Telco, I get 'Ring requested on unconfigured channel 255/255 span 2' It's always channel 255/255 ??, the 'span' number is random Setup: * between Local