similar to: Asterisk + DRBD Performance

Hi, I'm coming up with ideas about building a cluster of asterisk servers, and am exploring the virtualization option. I'm curious to know some real-world data about how many extensions a VMWare install on good hardware could support. I've seen stories about how the hypervisor timeslicing can wreak havoc on call quality at some point. Is this really the case? If so, what's a

Hi, I remember seeing a T38 Gateway application for Asterisk 1.6 floating around, but I can't seem to find it again. Does anyone have any pointers to it? I really want to be able to send an incoming T38 connection directly to the PSTN. Thanks. -- James

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Matthew Jordan <mjordan at digium.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:12 PM, James Lamanna <jlamanna at gmail.com> wrote: > > Also, how big does the cache in frame.c grow to? > > I've recompiled with MALLOC_DEBUG on that server: > > > > asterisk -rx "memory show summary" > > > > .... > >

Hello all, we have a new setup with xen on centos5.3 I run drbd from lvm volumes to mirror data between the two servers. both servers are 1U nec rack mounts with 8GB RAM, 2x mirrored 1TB seagate satas. The one is a dual core xeon, and the other a quad-core xeon. I have a gigabit crossover link between the two with an MTU of 9000 on each end. I currently have 6 drbds mirroring across that

Hello, I have a couple of Dell 2950 III, both of them with CentOS 5.3, Xen, drbd 8.2 and cluster suite. Hardware: 32DB RAM, RAID 5 with 6 SAS disks (one hot spare) on a PERC/6 controller. I configured DRBD to use the main network interfaces (bnx2 driver), with bonding and crossover cables to have a direct link. The normal network traffic uses two different network cards. There are two DRBD

Hi. Between 2 linux (2.6.11 client and 2.6.14 server) machines connected by a 100Mb link I get samba performance copying a file from the client to the server through a smbmounted share of around 4.2MB/s Is this to be expected? Or can it be improved (and if so, how?) I've tried tweaking SO_(SND/RCV)BUF (after reading numerous articles on samba performance...), but it doesn't seem to have

Hi all, Disregard my previous posts, I've consolidated everything here. I'm having terrible performance issues with samba over a WAN (point-to-point T1 link). Doing a copy of a 2MB file from a samba server to a linux client running smbclient takes over 5 minutes. SCPing the same file takes seconds. The server is running samba version 3.0.25c with kernel 2.6.16.18. I've put up a set

> > Its up to 5.8G of resident memory with 28321 calls processed. > The OOM killer is going to kill this soon at this rate (8GB RAM machine). > This seems like a pretty serious problem. > It looks like I'll need to restart asterisk every night.... Hi the number of cpu cores that you see with top times 512Mbyte is the level of ram that's needed e.g. a hp-gen8 with 2 octo

Hi, I've noticed on asterisk 1.8.18 I'm hearing the blip of '#' DTMF to end the recording on the recording itself. Is there an easy way to truncate the last 200ms of the recording or so to eliminate this? The DTMF is coming in through rfc2833 and not inband. Thanks. -- James -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I have about 10 Cisco 7960s behind a PIX 506E (IOS v6.3) firewall. After some period of time, asterisk says that some of them are unreachable, and the phones lose their registration. The only way to make the phones recover is to clear the NAT translation tables for the phones on the PIX (clear xlate...) Does anyone know how to fix this? As you can imagine, it is quite annoying. And it does not

Hi, I've noticed that if I have a multi-line linksys (942 or 962) phone with the same sip registration mapped to each line key, that if all the lines are full the phone will accept another call. I would expect the phone to respond with "busy" so the call would to directly to voicemail. Has anyone else experienced this and know of a workaround? I know it seems like an

Hi ! Not very blocking because the smp module loads perfectly. # yum --exclude=kmod-drbd*\plus\* install kmod-drbd Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Excluding Packages in global exclude list Finished Reducing CentOS-4 - Plus to included packages only Finished Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies -->

hey, I have an application for drbd replication between a pair of EL6 servers, and I just realized that drbd is no longer built in. googling found me this blog on doing it using ElRepo distributions... http://www.broexperts.com/2012/06/how-to-install-drbd-on-centos-6-2/ is that still best practice? or is there a better distribution? or really... my application is a BackupPC server

hi xen user/dev list, i want to compile drbd 8.4 against kernel mainline 3.0 source and receive an error: my commands: # cd /usr/src/drbd-8.4.0 # ./autogen.sh # ./configure --localstatedir=/var --sysconfdir=/etc --with-km=yes # cd /usr/src/drbd-8.4.0/drbd # make clean # make KDIR=/usr/src/linux-3.0 the error message: *** In file included from include/linux/security.h:25,

hi xen user/dev list, i want to compile drbd 8.4 against kernel mainline 3.0 source and receive an error: my commands: # cd /usr/src/drbd-8.4.0 # ./autogen.sh # ./configure --localstatedir=/var --sysconfdir=/etc --with-km=yes # cd /usr/src/drbd-8.4.0/drbd # make clean # make KDIR=/usr/src/linux-3.0 the error message: *** In file included from include/linux/security.h:25,

Will there be a matching DRBD kernel module package for the latest kernel that is in the updates repository? The kernel version in the updates is: kernel-smp-2.6.9-34.0.1.EL.i686.rpm but I don't see a matching DRBD module in updates. Thanks, Steve

Hi, I have a server with Centos 5 + DRBD installed and is working fine, but when i run yum for udpate system show this error: Transaction Check Error: file /etc/drbd.conf conflicts between attempted installs of drbd-8.0.12-1.el5.centos and drbd82-8.2.6-1.el5.centos file /etc/rc.d/init.d/drbd conflicts between attempted installs of drbd-8.0.12-1.el5.centos and drbd82-8.2.6-1.el5.centos file

hi, I was following this wiki http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Ha-Drbd for my CentOS 5 installation, but it appears that the kmod-drdb is not for the newest kernel. Would anyone know how long before this is updated? kmod-drbd i686 8.0.6-1.2.6.18_8.1.14.el5 extras kernel i686 2.6.18-8.el5 installed

Hi, I've upgrade the kernel to the latest version (C5) and after the update the drbd is not being loaded at reboot time. My previous running kernel was 2.6.18-164.el5. I've checked the /lib/modules/ and /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.10.1.el5/weak-updates/drbd82/drbd.ko -> /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.el5/extra/drbd82/drbd.ko And /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.el5/extra/drbd82/drbd.ko exists 2004

Hi, I am trying to use drbd in my centos 5.4 but I keep getting errors. When I try modprobe -v drbd I receive insmod /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.el5PAE/extra/drbd/drbd.ko FATAL: Error inserting drbd (/lib/modules/2.6.18-164.el5PAE/extra/drbd/drbd.ko): Invalid module format. The current (running) kernel is 2.6.18-164.el5PAE kmod-drbd-8.0.16-5.el5_3 drbd-8.0.16-5.el5.centos Any tips?