similar to: RPID on called party

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "RPID on called party"

2010 Jul 01
3
Remote Party ID issue
Hi, i have the same problem. Trying to use the dialplan function CONNECTEDLINE() this way Set(CONNECTEDLINE(name)=${SIPPEER(${EXTEN},callerid_name)}) Set(CONNECTEDLINE(num)=${EXTEN}) ends with [Jul 1 16:30:50] ERROR[3954]: pbx.c:2902 ast_func_write: Function CONNECTEDLINE not registered Same happens trying function CALLEDID. I am using Asterisk 1.6.1.20. What do i
2018 Mar 14
2
Expected performance for WORM scenario
We can't stick to single server because the law. Redundancy is a legal requirement for our business. I'm sort of giving up on gluster though. It would seem a pretty stupid content addressable storage would suit our needs better. On 13 March 2018 at 10:12, Ondrej Valousek <Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote: > Yes, I have had this in place already (well except of the negative
2012 Aug 17
0
Trouble with call pickup using RPID with Cisco
I have a Cisco 1760V with FXO ports hooked to POTS lines talking SIP to asterisk 1.8.15.0. imagining in extensions.conf: exten => 1,1,Dial(SIP/121) exten => 2,1,Dial(SIP/121&SIP/122) When a caller dials extension 2 /and/ I have trustrpid=yes generaterpid=yes sendrpid=yes in sip.conf and I use the pickup exten, the caller is disconnected. see:
2018 Mar 13
3
Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Ondrej Valousek < Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote: > Well, it might be close to the _*synchronous*_ nfs, but it is still well > behind of the asynchronous nfs performance. > > Simple script (bit extreme I know, but helps to draw the picture): > > > > #!/bin/csh > > > > set HOSTNAME=`/bin/hostname` > > set j=1
2018 Mar 13
1
Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 2:42 PM, Ondrej Valousek < Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote: > Yes, I have had this in place already (well except of the negative cache, > but enabling that did not make much effect). > > To me, this is no surprise ? nothing can match nfs performance for small > files for obvious reasons: > Could you give profile info of the run you did with
2018 Mar 13
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
Yes, I have had this in place already (well except of the negative cache, but enabling that did not make much effect). To me, this is no surprise ? nothing can match nfs performance for small files for obvious reasons: 1. Single server, does not have to deal with distributed locks 2. Afaik, gluster does not support read/write delegations the same way NFS does. 3. Glusterfs is
2009 May 24
0
RPID on SNOM phones?
Hello, I am running Asterisk 1.4 with the RPID patch (8824) in order to display the name of the *called* person. It works on Cisco and Polycom phones, but not on SNOM. The local SNOM dealer claims that he saw it working, but he cannot give me more details. Has anyone managed to make it working? Thanks, __Yehavi: -------------- next part -------------- An
2008 Nov 27
0
Softphones with RPID and BLF
Hello, I am looking for a softphone which supports RPID (displaying the called party name) and BLF features. I couldn't find one so far... Any idea whether such a softphone exists? Thanks! __Yehavi: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2006 Feb 11
1
FYI: new firmware for 7905/12 - RPID support
maybe usefull for displaying CALLED party name when dialing.... I'm remember, that this feature was planned to add to asterisk, any progress? PJ New and Changed Information Release 8.0(0) includes the following new and enhanced features: ?Remote-Party ID support has been added for incoming INVITE and UPDATE requests and 18x and 200 responses.
2018 Mar 13
5
Expected performance for WORM scenario
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Ondrej Valousek < Ondrej.Valousek at s3group.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Gluster will never perform well for small files. > > I believe there is nothing you can do with this. > It is bad compared to a disk filesystem but I believe it is much closer to NFS now. Andreas, Looking at your workload, I am suspecting there to be lot of LOOKUPs
2005 Aug 10
6
USB handset wanted
Hello all asterisk users! Question: Does anybody know about any good USB handset that would understand SIP and Asterisk and will run with Linux? I have found tons of them, but they are mainly only supported in Windows environment. I would like to set up new phone system in our company that would be based on asterisk acting as PBX and SIP. If you have any suggestions, please let me know. Any
2006 Nov 13
8
Desktop integration
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000066"> <font size="+1">Hi all,<br> <br> I am interested in
2018 Mar 13
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
Well, it might be close to the _synchronous_ nfs, but it is still well behind of the asynchronous nfs performance. Simple script (bit extreme I know, but helps to draw the picture): #!/bin/csh set HOSTNAME=`/bin/hostname` set j=1 while ($j <= 7000) echo ahoj > test.$HOSTNAME.$j @ j++ end rm -rf test.$HOSTNAME.* Takes 9 seconds to execute on the NFS share, but 90 seconds on
2018 Mar 07
1
gluster for home directories?
Hi, On 2018-03-07 16:35, Ondrej Valousek wrote: > Why do you need to replace your existing solution? > If you don't need to scale out due to the capacity reasons, the async > NFS server will always outperform GlusterFS The current solution is 8 years old and is reaching its end of life. The reason we are also looking into gluster is that we like that it uses standard components
2018 Mar 14
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
That seems unlikely. I pre-create the directory layout and then write to directories I know exist. I don't quite understand how any settings at all can reduce performance to 1/5000 of what I get when writing straight to ramdisk though, and especially when running on a single node instead of in a cluster. Has anyone else set this up and managed to get better write performance? On 13 March
2007 Sep 19
18
sip.conf best practices?
All - I've been wrestling with how to best structure the sip device accounts on a new asterisk server I'm deploying. All of the sip devices (currently only Linksys SPA941s) will reside on the same subnet as the server, and I have already set up a decent automatic provisioning system for the phones. When the rollout is complete, there will be about 100 SIP devices authenticating and
2006 Nov 13
3
FW: Desktop integration
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000066"> Hi Dean,<br> <br> I will check that site - thanks for the hint.<br> The biggest problem I see with
2012 Jun 01
2
ssh & control groups
Hi List, I am looking for an option for sshd to start user's shell (when logging in interactively to a remote host) in a control group via cgexec - so for example: /bin/cgexec -g <username> /bin/bash This would be extremely handy on linux Terminal servers to control users access to the system resources (protect system from a malicious user hogging the machine by running cpu/memory
2018 Mar 12
0
Expected performance for WORM scenario
Hi, Gluster will never perform well for small files. I believe there is nothing you can do with this. Ondrej From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Ericsson Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 1:47 PM To: Gluster-users at gluster.org Subject: [Gluster-users] Expected performance for WORM scenario Heya fellas. I've been
2018 Mar 07
0
gluster for home directories?
Hi, Why do you need to replace your existing solution? If you don't need to scale out due to the capacity reasons, the async NFS server will always outperform GlusterFS Ondrej ----- The information contained in this e-mail and in any attachments is confidential and is designated solely for the attention of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, you must not use,