similar to: Asterisk going down

Hi, I'm getting some strange behaviour on Asterisk 1.4 running on Debian Stable (Lenny). I suspect it's something to do with my setup, rather than a bug, but I'm struggling to see it, and would appreciate any input. Setup: PC with two ethernet cards: eth0 goes to local network, including two SIP phones (Aastra 9112i, wired, and Nokia E75, over WIFI); eth1 goes to router and

My friends, I'm having some problems in my Asterisk, the thing is that Asterisk seem to be crashed (or dead) sometimes (2 times in 3 weeks) I noticed this today, when i could not make any internall call, tha calls to the voicemail (*1) did not work it just don't say nothing, nothing appears in console; i tried to make a CLI>stop now but nothing happens, i could not stop the asterisk

Hello My friends, Today my asterisk stop working and i could see the following messags in /var/log/asterisk/messages at the time that asterisk stop working: [Feb 16 13:23:40] NOTICE[8230] chan_sip.c: Peer '324' is now Reachable. (2ms / 2000ms) [Feb 16 13:24:41] NOTICE[8230] chan_sip.c: Disconnecting call 'SIP/302-b720dd78' for lack of RTP activity in 301 seconds [Feb 16 13:25:54]

Although I'm convinced that Broadvoice doesn't have the most stable of ping times, it seems like I get ping results that are approximately the ping time +2000ms at times. Has anyone experienced this problem with qualify on a SIP connection before? So here, was the ping 20ms or 2020ms as reported? Aug 22 06:39:49 NOTICE[6964]: chan_sip.c:8481 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer

Hello list, I have nat=no and qualify=no in my sip peer definition and still my CLI is flooded with : [Mar 12 10:17:26] NOTICE[20278]: chan_sip.c:12985 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'mysippeer' is now Reachable. (30ms / 2000ms) [Mar 12 10:17:26] NOTICE[20278]: chan_sip.c:12985 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'mysippeer' is now Reachable. (24ms / 2000ms) [Mar 12 10:17:26]

I've installed 2.8.1 on a Raspberry PI 5 using Pi OS bookworm 64 bit (Debian 12) with success. When I take that same configuration to a PI 3B running bookworm 32 bit, compile from source, use the same files from /etc/nut, I get a 'nut-monitor ups at localhost Connection refused. usbhid-ups and dummy-ups are running at the time. What should I be looking for? Dan -------------- next

Good day to all-- First off let me say that I have been very pleased with the mailing list. I have learned a ton of stuff just reading other peoples questions and comments. I really enjoyed the VOIP Conference call on Friday morning. Still working on figuring out the best approach to custom voicemail emails (the reason I joined this group); however, we have more pressing issues. I

Hello all, I hope someone can help me with this old Asterisk version. I have to run this version because of a custom IVR written on it. Porting it would take much too long and we'd have to hire a consultant because of all the hooks it has into Oracle databases and real-time information. We have a brand-new Avaya phone system in place and we will be cutting over to it in late March 2019.

On my network I have one Samba PDC (Version 3.0.28 running on FreeBSD 6.3-PRERELEASE), one mail server (FreeBSD + Dovecot + Postfix) and a dozen or so WinXP/Win2K machines. The WinXP/Win2K machines all have static IP addresses. The Windows clients are configured to look up the Samba PDC machine for both DNS and WINS. The Windows clients seem to be able to find other machines as well as the PDC:

Hi, I have a Dell PowerEdge 1950 with two NICs Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T. I installed CentOS 5.1 and Xen 3.0.3 (RPM). One of my virtual machines has Windows 2003 Server. In this virtual machine my NICs appears like "Realtek RTL8139 Family PCI Fast Ethernet NIC". The problem is that when I ping to other machines sometimes the reply time value is very high: C:>

The current Linux scheduler makes one big assumption: that 1ms of CPU time is the same as any other 1ms of CPU time, and that therefore a process makes the same amount of progress regardless of which particular ms of time it gets. This assumption is wrong now, and will become more wrong as virtualization gets more widely used. It's wrong now, because it fails to take into account of several

The current Linux scheduler makes one big assumption: that 1ms of CPU time is the same as any other 1ms of CPU time, and that therefore a process makes the same amount of progress regardless of which particular ms of time it gets. This assumption is wrong now, and will become more wrong as virtualization gets more widely used. It's wrong now, because it fails to take into account of several

Thanks for the reply John. About 85-90% of what this box has to do is just handle calls, but it also has options to transfer calls to the main phone system, which up to now has been another asterisk box. For example, you can hit 6 to be transferred to the Lost & Found Department. I do have allowguest set to “yes” already, but of course I also have type=peer and the other stuff for a sip

I'm having trouble setting up tls/srtp secure communications on my Asterisk server- I'm still rather new at working with Asterisk. I have enabled tls and encryption and I have csipsimple with tls build on the phone. I'm currently only testing one phone with this capability so far, and the rest still work in the current state. My logging looks like this with verbose turned up:

Good morning, I'm having suddenly cut-offs and I don`t know why. It's been hapenning since I enabled cdr_odbc/func_odbc in my system. We use func_odbc to register some queue member's events (login, pause, etc.) at an external DB ('remoto' connector) and to uptade local tables at a local DB ('local' connector). Currently we are usind cdr_odbc to Postgresql and cdr_addon

When I start my script: * - Creating classes on br1 for upload control ... * - tc class add dev br1 parent 2:0 classid 2:46 hfsc ls m1 576.0Kbit d 2000ms m2 192.0Kbit ul m2 384Kbit ... [ ok ] * - tc class add dev br1 parent 2:46 classid 2:47 hfsc sc umax 1500b dmax 30ms rate 80Kbit . [ ok ] * - tc class add dev br1 parent 2:46 classid 2:48 hfsc ls m2 152.0Kbit ul m2 152.0Kbit

I just migrated a W2K3 Server to a Xen HVM domain, using the gplpv 0.10.69 drivers. Now ping shows strange results: Pinging 127.0.0.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time=23538ms TTL=128 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time=-23538ms TTL=128 Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Same result with external

On 2018-09-09 10:27, Antony Stone wrote: <snip > 1. Try removing one of the two commas. > > 2. Take a copy of your dialplan, and then strip out *everything* except > the > one context and the one number you want to match: > > [0705680837] > exten => 31705680837,1,NooP( Incoming 31705680837 on CC) > same => n,Answer(); > same =>

Hi All, I'm wondering if anyone can share any info on why I frequently get peer timeouts like below, and receive 489 messages from another A*k server on the same LAN. For the peers, we've one L2 switch. ICMP is <1ms. The CPU of the main A*k server is usually < 2%. So I can't see why we'd get such large delays. The phones are all Cisco 7940s (SIP 2xx) The 489 originate

I noticed a problem with time synchronization on all Windows endpoints. I am using Samba 4.21.3 and Chrony 4.3-2. When I run the following command in Windows: w32tm /monitor dc1.xxxx.pl *** PDC ***[192.168.45.10:123]: ICMP: 1ms delay NTP: +0.0000000s offset from dc1.xxxx.pl RefID: time.cloudflare.com [162.159.200.123] Stratum: 4 dc2.xxxx.pl[192.168.45.9:123]: ICMP: 1ms delay NTP: -0.0001207s