similar to: T.38 and Linksys SPA8000

Hi, Has anyone compared SPA8000 vs. GXW4008 especially in terms of firmware and hardware stability (the feature sets are apparently similar)? Vieri

I'm having issues with T.38 on Asterisk 1.6.2.8. A few lines are received OK and then I get only garbage. I'm using ReceiveFAX() provided by app_fax to receive the faxes. After talking to the engineers on the telco, they said Asterisk is sending a REINVITE to alaw after the T.38 reception is complete, and that could be the cause of the problems. I personally am not totally convinced of

Hello everyone. I'm struggling to get T.38 faxing to work in Asterisk 1.6.1.13 with a SIP DID provider here in Brazil (GVT - Vox IP service). Here's my scenario: When faxes arrive by a specific DID, they are routed thru this simple macro: [macro-recebefax] exten => s,1,Set(DB(fax/count)=$[${DB(fax/count)} + 1]) exten => s,n,Set(FAXCOUNT=${DB(fax/count)}) exten =>

This message is pointed directly to Steve Underwood. I tought it would not be nice to directly email him with a question that interests a good part of the Asterisk community, so here it is. :) Steve, remember a few days ago when we discussed about issues on Asterisk 1.6.1.13 and T.38 fax reception? Well I opened an issue on Mantis (https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16756) and turns out it

Hi, I'm trying to configure a Linksys/Cisco SPA8000 talking SIP to both a local Asterisk server and also with a trunk directly to a VOIP provider. Everything works great, except I'm having a problem setting the outbound caller ID to a value different from the SIP username/authname. The SPA8000 has SIP setting for Display Name, User ID, Password, and Auth ID, as well as a "Use Auth

Hi I'm trying to get the spa 8000 used with a fax machine using t38 passthru i have tried with 1.6.2 and 1.8.3 and is still a no go the provider i use is 012 in israel wich supports t38 (i use it with ffa) could anybody give me a clue how to get this working if it should t38pt is set to yes in sip.conf Thanks, Israel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hi guys, Anyone have experience using the Linksys spc tool to provision devices? I've been fighting with it all afternoon and can not get the tool to parse a xml file properly. I can get it to generate me a .cfg file from a text file, but when I tell the unit to pull down the cfg file it doesn't really look like any of my settings were even set from the file I generated. Thanks for any

Hi, I have a set of Grandstream GXW4008 (units of 8 FXS ATAs) and another set of Linksys SPA8000 (8 FXS ATAs). The GXW4008 has a "neat feature" called "early dial" which allows me to define a "dial pattern" as generic as {*X+,#+,X+} (or something similar; the idea is to "match all digits") and send those digits >>immediately<< as they are

Quick and dirty question: for the TDM410P I must use the wctdm24xxp driver? Att Vin?cius Fontes Desenvolvimento Canall Tecnologia em Comunica??es Ltda.

All; I'm having a problem sending an outbound fax using Asterisk-1.8.15-cert3 and the spandsp fax module using a SIP trunk. I'm seeing hundreds of these: ERROR[14423]: udptl.c:294 encode_open_type: UDPTL (SIP/runcentral_outbound-00000074): Buffer overflow detected (59 + 134 > 175) Has anyone ever seen this before? I have the following configuration. udptl.conf:

I have a pretty large setup on one of my customers. Digium TE420B (with echo cancelling module), 3 Xorcom Astribanks with 32 FXS each and 1 Xorcom Astribank with 16 FXO. These FXO ports are NOT used for fax/data transmission, as they are connected to cell phones. Not really related to the issue, but there are also 250 SIP phones. The problem is that fax and dial-up connections are really

Good afternoon gentlemen (and ladies). A costumer of mine has many servers and each one maps their SIP extensions to the others via DUNDi. It works like a charm. SIP extensions can only register at one server, the one they "belong" to. In case one extension wants to call other that is registered in another server, DUNDi takes care of that by calling the other server using IAX2 and G.729

Hello everyone. I got a little problem in here: I want to set up a queue so that if anything of these happens: a) No agents logged in b) All agents busy Then the user gets diverted somewhere. I used this (for testing purposes only, of course): exten => 7080,1,Answer() exten => 7080,n,Queue(teste) exten => 7080,n,Goto(${QUEUESTATUS}) exten => 7080,n(ERROR),NoOp(${QUEUESTATUS}) exten

Gentlemen, I have 3 faxes attached to an Asterisk. Fax - SPA2102 - Asterisk. 0851711201 and 0851711290 is on our WAN, no NAT. 0197673581 is outside our WAN and needs to be NAT'ed. Sending a fax from 0851711201 to 0851711290, no problem, switches to T38 and fax goes through. Sending a from 0197673581 to 0851711201, no problem as long as i dont enable T38 on 0197673581. But, if i enable T38

Does the application PGSQL has been removed from Asterisk? Couldn't find it on Asterisk source and addons. Atenciosamente, Vin?cius Fontes Gerente de Seguran?a da Informa??o Canall Tecnologia em Comunica??es Passo Fundo - RS - Brasil +55 54 2104-7000 Information Security Manager Canall Tecnologia em Comunica??es Passo Fundo - RS - Brazil +55 54 2104-7000

Dear list, I've got the following setup : [FAX-ATA]--[PBX LAN]--[Firewall]--[PBX WAN]-----[upstream SIP] On the PBX's we run Asterisk 1.4.33 with t38pt_udptl=yes in [general]. The FAX ATA is a Teles VoIPBox with T.38 support (that works). On the PBX WAN, i see the following in udptl debug : Sent UDPTL packet to 172.16.0.156:4460 (type 0, seq 184, len 32) Got UDPTL packet from

Hi, I have been trying to get T.38 to work with clients behind NAT for the past week but with no success. I have an asterisk server on the public internet and several Grandstream (I tried Linksys too) HT502 ATAs behind NAT in different locations. I tried every possible combination of NAT, canreinvite, t38pt_usertpsource entries, I even tried asterisk 1.4.19, 1.4.24.1, 1.4.25 all with the same

What I have is: * Asterisk 1.8.10.1~dfsg-1ubuntu1, * SPA112 ATA with analog fax in 1-st FXS port connected, * SIP trunk with provider supporting T.38. My network looks like this: * spa112 (192.168.33.200/24) and Asterisk (192.168.5.253/24) in neighbouring LANs, * Asterisk connects to the provider (80.75.130.136) via router (82.200.7.184). Router has full DNAT to Asterisk server. What happens?

Hi, I have asterisk 1.6.2.6 on a Debian Lenny system. When I try to send a fax in T.38 mode I receive this error ERROR[15035]: res_fax.c:795 set_fax_t38_caps: channel 'SIP/eutelia-sirio-out-00000000' is in an unsupported T.38 negotiation state, cannot continue. In my sip.config general section I have added this lines t38pt_udptl=yes t38pt_rtp=no t38pt_tcp=no If I comment this lines,

Does anybody have T.38 faxing working with Flowroute? I am running Asterisk 1.6.2.7-rc3 with spandsp 0.0.6-pre17. I can successfully receive faxes over ulaw. I enabled T.38 with t38pt_udptl=yes in sip.conf. When I receive a fax it tries to negotiate T.38 and Flowroute sends back a Bad Request response saying I have a SIP syntax error. Flowroute support is recommending that I try again after