similar to: Recording the Calls to a USB Drive

Hi * Users, I ran into a problem when I was trying to communicate an avaya IP Office talk to asterisk with SIP Trunking. I had successful calls from asterisk to Avaya but not from avaya to asterisk. Can someone provide me insight on how to address it or the path to resolve it. The error I get is mentioned below: (dialing 32564 from avaya to asterisk) "[Nov 6 17:14:23] WARNING[6227]:

Hi list! We currently have a PRI gateway composed by a box with two Digium quad-span PRI cards (a TE420 and a ). One of the cards is filled with TELCO1, while the other has first two slots filled with TELCO2, and 3rd slot with TELCO3. I am currently having (timer ?) issues on TELCO3 (span 7) D-Chan (202 as determined by dahdi_genconf ) is constantly failing causing on-going calls to terminate.

Can you say a Virtualized Asterisk with a PRI card! http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTY0OQ Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

Hi, I have a multiple checkbox of values 1 to 7 for selecting weekdays. What is the possibility of storing the selected weekdays array in mysql and what type of field should i create in the table for storing the array. Any suggestions??? Regards, Vimal Das --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Hi, Out of curiosity I got to learn Ruby on Rails. Wondering somehow, as to which Data base is best suited for Ruby on Rails and Why? Any Comments/Suggestions Please! Thanks Manu --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

Dear Folks, [Test_Context] exten => _911.,1,AGI(agi://127.0.0.1:4577/call_log) exten => _911.,2,Set(CALLERID(num)=xxxxxxx) exten => _911.,3,Set(CALLTIME=${STRFTIME(${EPOCH},Asia/Calcutta,%d-%b-%Y-%H-%M-%S)}) exten => _911.,4,Set(RECSUBDIR=${STRFTIME(${EPOCH},Asia/Calcutta,%d%b%Y)}) exten => _911.,5,Set(${CALLERID}=${CALLERID(num)}) exten =>

Hello All, I posted a bug on the 14th of this month, and haven't heard anything back. However, I've since discovered that the problem is not in chan_iax.c as I originally thought, it's actually app_mixmonitor.c. Basically when I use 1.4.26.2 with an ilbc codec between two asterisk servers trunked via IAX, with mixmonitor Asterisk crashes on me. Here's a link to the post:

We have a customer where their VM running Asterisk appears to have crashed. Fortunately, we had some debugging enabled. The asterisk messages file has this... (in notepad+ the blank line in the middle is all [NUL][NUL] [NUL][NUL]....) [08/12 15:30:55.880] VERBOSE[6920] app_mixmonitor.c: Begin MixMonitor Recording CBRec/IS__a37ae004-c780-4c7f-88a9-a04402f0ab4e-0000e70f [08/12 15:30:55.881]

Hi All, Can anyone help me in making feed[xml/rss] generator for a webpage based on ruby/ruby on rails. Tell me if any ruby code is already available, to generate feeds for a webpage. Thanks in Advance. Sumanth. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Here is a problem scenario. I want to enable a backend pass at -O2 or above. if (TM->getOptLevel() >= CodeGenOpt::Default) addPass(&xxxxx); This pass will be run at -O1 too since clang is creating the TargetMachine with CodeGenOpt::Default for -O1. --Sumanth G -----Original Message----- From: mehdi.amini at apple.com [mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com] Sent: Friday, January 6, 2017

Hi, AFAIK, the tools "symbolizer, objdump and nm" need a demangler. I see there is libcxxabi which provides the demangle library. But there is no support to build libcxxabi on windows with MSVC. This left a huge void and my symbolizer cannot work on Windows if built with MSVC. Instead of mucking around OS dependencies, why shouldn't we have a demangle library in LLVM.

Hi, I see there is an inconsistency in LLVM libc calls. For a modulo (reminder) operation, clang -target arm-none-linux-gnueabi generates "__modsi3". clang -target arm-none-eabi generates "__aeabi_idivmod" clang -target arm-linux-androideabi generates "__modsi3" Android bionic libc doesn't provide a __modsi3, instead it provides

Hi, I wonder if this is a valid flag in either clang/gcc. The flag in question is "-march=aarch64". I verified with latest tip and neither clang nor gcc fail to recognize this flag. This piece of code is in cmake/config-ix.cmake in compiler-rt repo. + elseif("${COMPILER_RT_TEST_TARGET_ARCH}" MATCHES "aarch64") + test_target_arch(aarch64

Hi, I am observing a deadlock with llvm-lit on windows 7. When I attached a debugger, the communicate() call is blocked. In file utils/lit/lit/TestRunner.py > # FIXME: There is probably still deadlock potential here. Yawn. > procData = [None] * len(procs) > procData[-1] = procs[-1].communicate() I am invoking python directly on windows to run the unit tests.

Tim, How about the below option ? 1. Specify an existing generic armv7 CPU or the CPU which is close my custom variant. My custom variant can be treated as "cortex-a9" + hwdiv. So my CPU here is "cortex-a9" 2. Specify the ".arch_extension idiv" which is available as an extension for my custom variant. 3. Teach LLVM & Clang about your CPU's

I see the BackendUtil.cpp of Clang creates the TargetMachine with the optimization level based on below mentioned logic CodeGenOpt::Level OptLevel = CodeGenOpt::Default; switch (CodeGenOpts.OptimizationLevel) { default: break; case 0: OptLevel = CodeGenOpt::None; break; case 3: OptLevel = CodeGenOpt::Aggressive; break; } As per my understanding, the correspondence between

Hi, What is the guarantee that the codegen is same across Release and Release+Asserts build (except the known differences)? I assume there is no guarantee and it is possible to drop a bug like this. Personally I feel it is very expensive to debug and it depends on each scenario. Most of the bots test the Release+Asserts mode and any thoughts on how we can catch this sort of a problem

On 28 July 2015 at 17:52, Sumanth Gundapaneni <sgundapa at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Android bionic libc doesn’t provide a __modsi3, instead it provides > “__aeabi_idivmod”. Hi Sumanth, Have a look at ARMSubtarget.h, functions: bool isTargetAEABI() They control the lowering of DIV/MOD calls in ARMISelLowering.cpp. Maybe Android needs to be in? cheers, --renato

getOptLevel() gets the level from TargetMachine which is created by the Backendutil in clang with either "Default", "None" or "Aggressive". Threre is no correspondence for "Less". This boils down to , if I pass "-O1", the Target Machine is created with CodeGenOpt::Default. I am available on IRC @ sgundapa. -----Original Message----- From:

> -----Original Message----- > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Mehdi > Amini via llvm-dev > Sent: Friday, January 06, 2017 11:10 AM > To: Sumanth Gundapaneni > Cc: LLVM Developers > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] LLVMTargetMachine with optimization level passed > from clang. > > > > On Jan 6, 2017, at 10:56 AM, Sumanth