similar to: Incoming extension not working.

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Incoming extension not working."

2008 Oct 04
5
Vitelity Asterisk configuration help
I have a Asterisk server setup and I am able to connect to the server using a soft client 'x-lite' and call and leave a message on my second extension 102. I have setup a Vitelity account and add what I believe to be the correct information to my sip.conf and extension.conf. I would like to setup incoming and outgoing calls with voicemail support. I've searched all over but many of the
2008 Oct 19
6
adding a second extension
I'm trying to add a second extension to my setup. The second device is able to successfully connect to the Asterisk server. I am unable to contact extension 101 from 102 and vise-versa. Also are my context setup logically or is there a better fashion to organize them? My error is at the bottom. Here is the extension.conf [default] ; ; By default we include the demo. In a production system,
2006 Jan 09
7
"Decent" sub-$100 SIP phone.
Hey, all. I quoted a customer about $100 for some cheap SIP phones. I was planning on using the BT-102's, but he called said they look like "Princess phones," and I have to admit that he has a point. Some of the other inexpensive phones look decent, but (for example) the SPA-841's wiki entry says the remote end gets a lot of static. Since it'll be being used from a noisy
2006 Jan 18
1
SpanDSP not sending to fax extension.
Hi, all. I've got a fax extension in my extensions.conf, but spandsp never sends my faxes there. Both applications -- txfax and rxfax -- are registered by Asterisk, so they compiled and installed correctly. I've got a Sangoma A104 card, and (as some people had suggested) have loaded ztdummy. Everything seems fine, except that it never gets recognized as a fax. I've even turned off
2008 Oct 15
1
Cisco 7960 not always receiving incoming calls
I've searched around and found a few similar situations where the phone will call out when using a Asterisk server but not receive inbound calls. My issue is a little stranger. If I call out from the phone then the phone will receive the next inbound call. The phone will not receive another inbound call until a call out again from it first. Any ideas? I am using SIP and am using the latest
2008 Mar 14
1
Looking for a cheap SIP termination point.
Hi, all. I'm trying to do some rudimentary testing of an Asterisk system, but, for various reasons, I have to do this covertly, which means I'm paying out-of-pocket. So I'm looking for somewhere that will do *cheap* SIP and/or IAX termination, preferably with at least two simultaneous calls, and one DID. Any suggestions? Thanks, -Ken
2009 Oct 05
6
Receptionist GUI?
Hey, all. Just wondering if there's a GUI out there -- preferably OSS, but I'll take what-have-you -- that a) can run on an Ubuntu/Debian box, and b) allows a receptionist to see what calls are in-process, and forward calls from their phone to somewhere else. Thanks! -Ken -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
2010 Sep 06
3
Samba for AD client?
Hey, all. I'm planning on migrating a W2K3 server to a Linux solution. It needs to be AD-aware, support ACLs, etc. This isn't something I'm doing Right Now(tm), so I can wait a little bit. A couple questions: 1) Are there any known issues with BTRFS? 2) Which version of Samba would be most appropriate for this? 3) AD integration: I've never really done it (with success); any
2014 Dec 16
3
PJSIP configuration question
Ok Dan, try this... I was able to get this to work behind a NAT and with ip address authentication. [global] type = global debug = yes [transport1] type = transport bind = 0.0.0.0 protocol = udp *local_net=<yourlocalnet I.E. 10.10.10.10/24 <http://10.10.10.10/24>>external_media_address=<your public ip address>external_signaling_address=<your public address>*
2008 Jan 24
6
Your "favorite" Asterisk application.
Hi, all. I've done some Asterisk recelling, but recently got roped into a Sr. SysAdmin position. Our PBX is c. 1823, and -- well, as pretty much all circuit-based systems do, it sucks. It sucks to administer, moves suck... you know the drill. So, I'd love change to an Asterisk system. My boss, who loves to spend money for no particular reason, wants to go proprietary, though. So
2014 Dec 15
2
PJSIP configuration question
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Dan Cropp <dan at amtelco.com> wrote: > > Yes, everything is behind the same NAT. > > > > For the application I?m working on, the only endpoint is the endpoint to > Vitelity. > > We use AMI to Originate calls from Asterisk endpoint through Vitelity to > phones. > > After that, we control the call through AMI to perform the
2014 Dec 16
1
PJSIP configuration question
Here's an update... My network admin would not turn off the ALG because it would cause several other problems to other phone systems we have. He looked at the sip trace. What he found is the PJSIP trace showed a different IP address than the older chan_sip so he had me change the aor contact to outbound.vitelity.net At this point, it seems to be working (and this is going through a Cisco
2014 Dec 16
2
PJSIP configuration question
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Dan Cropp <dan at amtelco.com> wrote: > > I am not sure if I entered the correct settings for the transport > information. > > For the local_net, I entered my local ip address, but no mask. I will > check with the network admin so he can verify the settings I entered. > > > You need the network and mask. For example if the ip
2010 Sep 02
5
Google Voice-like feature.
I'd *really* like to be able to have a call ring three different cell phones; then, if someone answers, they have to somehow acknowledge the call for it to be directed to them. That way, if one of the phones is off, or out of range, it doesn't go straight to that phone's voicemail. Asterisk 1.4 -- though I could probably upgrade. Suggestions on how to make this happen? Thanks!
2014 Dec 15
2
PJSIP configuration question
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Dan Cropp <dan at amtelco.com> wrote: > > Hi George, > > > > Thank you for looking into this. > > This is behind a nat? > > > Just to be clear...both the pbx and local endpoints are behind the same NAT? > [global] > > type = global > > debug = yes > > > > [transport1] > > type = transport
2010 Jun 21
3
Polycom firmware: split vs. combined
http://downloads.polycom.com/voice/voip/sip_sw_releases_matrix.html Howdy, all. What's the difference between "split" and "combined" firmware, which can be seen at the above link? I've googled to no avail, I'm afraid. Thanks! -Ken -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
2014 Dec 10
4
PJSIP configuration question
Not sure why, but Vitelity changed the settings to IP based authentication on me. Here's the new sip.conf settings they sent me. type=friend dtmfmode=auto host=64.2.142.93 allow=all nat=yes canreinvite=no trustrpid=yes sendrpid=yes When I use these settings to originate calls using the sip.conf they sent me, everything works. Action: Originate ActionID: S8 Channel:
2014 Dec 16
4
PJSIP configuration question
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Dan Cropp <dan at amtelco.com> wrote: > > Thanks George. > > I will correct my local_net in the morning. > > Vitelity chan_sip settings I have working, do not have a fromuser. > sip.conf settings... > > I think you can actually specify anything, it just has to be populated with something other than a sub-account username. >
2010 Feb 18
5
OpenVPN/SNOM 820: a review.
Hey, all. Got an SNOM 820 in the other day to kick the tires. As with many phones, provisioning it was a bit of a PITA. The biggest problem, as far as I could tell, was that their firmware just doesn't seem that stable, and is sometimes hard to get to. - I managed to corrupt the firmware twice; fortunately, instead of bricking the phone, there's a fairly easy-to-use "rescue
2007 Sep 13
3
Voicemail in 1.4?
I got dragged away from Asterisk (somebody made me an offer I couldn't refuse for system administration), but I'm thinking about seeing if I can't get it deployed at my new employer. Regardless, there are two things about older voicemail that used to annoy me: - Dial by name. Has anyone made it so it can be first or last? - Jump to voicemail; you used to have to actually dial the