similar to: rtp.conf dtmftimeout

I have a samba 3 domain controller and would like to have an NT4 server as a BDC, is this possible. Can the schema and user accounts be migrated to the NT4 machine, so that the NT4 machine can be upgraded to Active Directory? Has anyone done this before? -- Cody Jarrett IT Freedom? cjarrett@itfreedom.com Office: 512.419.0070 Fax: 512.419.0080

We are trying to use a softphone from a location that is behind a firewall. We are using x-lite as the softphone. So far, we've been able to get the phone to register with the asterisk server, and it can receive voice from the asterisk server (IE, voicemail, etc). However, asterisk can't hear anything from the softphone. We have used 2 different machines to test this on. We are watching

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2246 Bug ID: 2246 Summary: PAM enhancements for OpenSSH server Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.6p1 Hardware: Sparc OS: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: PAM support Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

I have a private trunk with a peer. A call comes in from the trunk, and Asterisk calls a peer agent. If the agent transfers the call (this is a blind transfer using REFER), I want Asterisk to send a REFER back to the trunk, and essentially stay out of the loop. As set up, Asterisk initiates a new call using INVITE to the trunk and then bridges the original incoming and the new outgoing calls.

Asterisk 1.6 behind a firewall and NAT. We are terminating multiple DID calls, originating and transferring. A provider offers both SIP and IAX trunking. Cateris paribus, what is the preferred solution to choose? What points to consider? I can name the provider if this is not against this list policy--is it? Thanks, -kkm

Hello, I am having trouble passing DTMF digits from a Polycom 330 SIP phone to my FXS/FXO lines. I am running Asterisk 1.4.21.1 In sip.conf I configured dtmfmode=inband. RTP traffic (voice) goes perfectly from SIP to FXS, but in the SIP phone I only hear a continuous noise. However, when I press any digit in the pone (FXS) I hear the DTMF tone fine in the SIP phone (the noise goes away for as

Hi All, We are running asterisk 1.8.3.2 and if in future i need to upgrade with new release then how should i upgrade it. The reason i am asking is i did lots of customization in make menuselect so do i need to keep all option remember or is there anyway i just copy paste existing configuration file in new tarball and just run make make install something like that... How you guys doing this

Good day all! I have an issue which has plagued me for quite sometime now...and as I close in on its cause, I have reached a point where additional info would be greatly helpful! When a SIP device dials another SIP device...Asterisk connects the calls and displays the channel information. If one of those SIP devices hangs up, Asterisk receives the hangup notice and disconnects the call/channel.

Hello, I thought to post this here before my manager starts his own coding project to give us a workaround. My situation I'm running into is as follows: 1. A call comes into our Asterisk system, it's trunked from one office to another via IAX. 2. Call enters a queue and is picked up by one of the agents. 3. That agent has to transfer the call, could be for a number of reasons the client

Hi, I''m having a weird validation issue. Validation isn''t working for certain attributes and, for some reason, it''s also affecting things outside of validation. For campers on certain camp types, we require some information about their school. I tried to validate the information this way: validates_presence_of :school_type, :if => Proc.new { |c| !c.booking.nil?

Hello, I am building a R-package for Genetics analysis. The accepted data is in pedigree (.ped) file format. To load the data (say CAMP.ped) from "data" directory, I have a function "CAMP.R", which does the job. The package builds successfully in Linux (.tar.gz) and the data loads successfully by "data(CAMP)". However, when I build the package in WINDOWS, the data

I upgraded from Asterisk 10 to 11 and switched from gtalk.conf and jabber.conf to use motif.conf and xmpp.conf. I disabled gtalk and jabber from loading in modules.conf noload => res_jabber.so noload => chan_gtalk.so After copying my settings to the new conf files and restarting Asterisk I had no errors, but making outgoing calls from clients just kept ringing even though the other side

In this real example (below), all four of the replicates in one treatment combination had zero failures, and this produced a very high standard error in the summary.lm. =20 Just adding one failure to one of the replicates produced a well-behaved standard error. =20 I don't know if this is a bug, but it is certainly hard for users to understand. =20 I would value your comments=20 =20 Thanks =20

On May 1, 2015, at 12:31 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > Proposal > Re-architect the linker based on the section model where it’s appropriate. > Stop simulating different linker semantics using the Unix model. Instead, directly implement the native behavior. Preface: I have never personally contributed code to LLD, so don’t take anything I’m about to say too seriously.

Dear R users, I am putting together reading and resources lists for spatial statistics and spatial econometrics and am looking for some pointers from more experienced practitioners. In particular, I find two "camps" in spatial modelling, and am wondering which approach is better suitied to which situation. The first camp is along the lines of Venables and Ripley's Chapter 14

I have what I hope is a simple question - is it possible to do time series analysis on a small data set specifically only four data points? I have collected human threat data (mean number of threats per kilometre walked/ survey) every 3 months in eight different sites (four with an experimental element and four control sites). I am trying to determine the best way to determine if there is a

I'm sorry if my suggestion gave an impression that I disregard the Mach-O port of the LLD linker. I do care about Mach-O. I do not plan to break or remove any functionality from the current Mach-O port of the LLD. I don't propose to remove the atom model from the linker as long as it seems to be a good fit for the port (and looks like it is). As to the proposal to have two different

Hallo all, I have the following glm model: f1 <- as.formula(paste("factor(y.fondi)~", "flgsess + segmeta2 + udm + zona.geo + ultimo.prod.", "+flg.a2 + flg.d.na2 + flg.v2 + flg.cc2", " +(flg.a1 + flg.d.na1 + flg.v1 + flg.cc1)^2", " + flg.a2:flg.d.na2 + flg.a2:flg.v2 +

It seems that there are a few camps here: * The scp power users - this camp believes that scp supporting backtick notation is fine and that running arbitrary commands is a perfectly fine thing to do. * The restricted shell users - this camp believes that scp supporting backtick may not be the best, and there are various restricted shells which can prevent this. Power users may belong to this

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Rui, > > Thank you for clarifying. This is very helpful. > > It’s unfortunate that you’re not seeing benefits from the increased > semantic knowledge the atom based model can provide. I know you’ve explored > the issue thoroughly, though, so I understand why you’re wanting to move a >