similar to: OT: Question about Wifi sniffing on network

Hi list, Before purchasing a number of Siemens DECT SIP phones, the Gigaset S675 IP, I read that the problems with MWI had been fixed with the latest firmware version (see http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Siemens+Gigaset+S675IP). Now I'm not so sure that's the case. After setting up a network mailbox for one of these phones, as well as an Asterisk voicemail account (ext.

Hi, We're pleased have a 25-year telephony veteran with us tomorrow, Aswath Rao. Aswath maintains that "Trapezoidal VoIP is Evil". Join us and ask questions, make comments, argue about geeky details... and maybe win a Gigaset S675IP SIP/DECT g722-capable phone with an additional handset. Those of us who have these phones like them a lot. All dial in info is here: http://VUC.me -

Hi all, My Asterisk problem today involves getting a SIP client on a private net to register with a server somewhere else on the Internet. This worked for me about a year ago no problem, but now I see an error message on the remote server every time the client attempts to connect (the server is running Debian lenny with Asterisk 1:1.4.21.2~dfsg-3). Here's an example: [Nov 11

Hi, With my Gigaset C470IP (with latest 02223 firmware), I can't find a way to access SMS settings from web configuration app or using a handset. Has someone been more successful without using auto-configuration mode ? (For instance, manual says an SMS entry is showing on handset screen but as I plugged my base station into a private LAN, I skipped the whole auto-configuration process ).

Hi folks, I wonder if any of you out there are using Siemens S685IP base station(s) (with S68H handsets) on Asterisk and experiencing problems with SIP registrations where the SIP extensions do not ring and peers become unreachable after a period of time. Symptoms are rather sporadic, but as described, SIP extensions being unreachable from Asterisk perspective. Also experienced 'not

Hi all, Is it possible to display or print variables in Asterisk (e.g. in the CLI) for debugging purposes? For example, I'm using two different types of SIP phones: the Snom M3 and the Siemens S675IP. However, when anonymous callers submit a number to the PrivacyManager, only the Siemens displays the new CID correctly; the Snom shows "unknown" (even though the new CID looks

Hi there, in case anyone is interested, I've just taken ownership of a small home network (3 handsets) of the brand new Siemens DECT PSTN/VOIP phone. It works great with Asterisk. Here's my overview and review so far... http://www.theopensourcerer.com/2008/04/27/siemens-gigaset-685ip-phones/ Cheers Al -- The way out is open! http://www.theopensourcerer.com

Hi all Assume that you have a linux bridge with two interfaces eth0 and eth1 enslaved to this bridge What is the difference between sniffing the bridge and sniffing its interfaces? tcpdump -i br0 vs tcpdump -i eth0 Thanks MiniME -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I can think of several potential differences. ?You may miss any bridge specific traffic (STP, LLDP) using the interfaces generated by the bridge itself. If you have vlan tagged sub interfaces you might also miss that traffic if you were snooping a particular interface. Obviously you will miss any on-wire broadcast traffic specific to the layer1 connection a particular interface was connected to

Ok assuming I don't want to record calls using * but instead want a dedicated server that listens to a mirror port and records calls. Is there a cheap software package out there for doing this for mgcp/sccp? I know if evern cut over to * there is a way but I doubt I will even cut 100% over to * so I was wonder what the list has heard of for call recording via sniffing my gates. I know there

Any recommendations on good wireless SIP phones? Thanks, Pedram -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20081105/6248fa14/attachment.htm

Hello, I am trying to understand how Tor protect to ISP sniffing in proxy. I suppose this steps: 1) Dowload Tor software, software should signed or downloaded from SSL site. 2) Computer software verify that software is not modified, and install it. 3) Vidalia starts tunnel, At this point how keys are exchanged? ... -- -- Devel in Precio http://www.pas-world.com

Hi everyone, I'd like to set up the RSA keys for the IAX registration, but have a couple of Q's. I have the manual and can follow the instructions, but I want to understand the limitations. First, understand there will be a central Asterisk (which has the private key?) and several remote Asterisks (which are as automated as possible, and each have the same public key?). We

Hello all, I want to sniff all these info to test a sip ip phone talking to a asterisk server. I have used tcpdump, but It just shows the UDP, length: 602 Anyway to see the sip uri. Host info? Regards, Dinesh. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, In a libvirt/KVM setup, what is the best way to prevent untrusted guest machines from (a) sending packets with a sender address different from their own and (b) reading packets not intended for them? Note that guests may have any number of IP addresses they are allowed to use legitimately. Guido -- Too much multitasking isn't good for you.

>>> Perhaps if there was a Asterisk RBL we could all contribute to; for >>> which we could then hook into and drop any connection where a >>> source IP is listed ? -- Thanks, Phil >>> >> >> I love the idea of a RBL... count me in for contributing. >> >> Especially considering the ridiculous response I received from >> Amazon.

Hi, I have a Centos5 machine running xen 3.0.3-41 with two NICs each on its own subnet: 192.168.1.x and 192.168.0.x. All DomUs can talk to each other OK through two xen bridges. There are 3 DomUs: Dom0, Dom1 and Dom2 The scenario: I''m trying to capture packets on Dom2 on 192.168.0.x from external devices that are sending SIP stuff to Dom1, but fail to capture any packets. I

>Thereby sorry for being impolite :-(, but at present I'm running samba >3.0.1pre1 with ldapsam in the production servers, >and Win9x clients couldn't get list of users and groups from Samba DCs (Bug596). I have 3 >choices: >- -- Switch back to 2.2.7 (not very nice:-(, I would need group support for policy) >- -- Switch to tdbsam with fam/rsync/ssh-ing password and group

Also, if password-based auth is not allowed, WTF would you want to log passwords? This whole idea is ugly, and smacks of a teenage-level prank attempt. I would strongly object against any such modification of the main source (though I'm sure the maintainers are sane enough to never let such a crap in). Of course the original poster is free to hack his own copy in whatever way he wants.?

after having my own dnsbl feeded by a honeypot and even mod_security supports it for webservers i think dovecot sould support the same to prevent dictionary attacks from known bad hosts, in our case that blacklist is 100% trustable and blocks before SMTP-Auth while normal RBL's are after SASL i admit that i am not a C/C++-programmer, but i think doing the DNS request and in case it has a