similar to: Question of resiliance

Hi This is the output from show dialplan dial-sipmnf-sippt-pstn [ Context 'dial-sipmnf-sippt-pstn' created by 'pbx_config' ] 's' => 1. Verbose(1,Dialing ${ARG1} on mnf pt pstn) [pbx_config] 2. Dial(SIP/${ARG1}@${SIPMNF},${ARG2},${OUTBDIAL}) [pbx_config] 3. Set(GLOBAL(FOUNDME)=${DIALSTATUS}) [pbx_config]

Hi, I'm using the macro below in extensions.conf for most of my outbound calls. One issue with my current configuration is that when I make an outbound call it doesn't properly detect that my PSTN line (Zap/1) is busy with another call and then overflow to my outbound IAX connections. I think the root cause is that DIALSTATUS gets reported as BUSY. The debug output is below. My desired

I can dial from 601 to a public number. The public number rings. I pickup and hear nothing, while on 601 it keeps ringing. (BTW, is it right to say "ringing" on the active phone?) The *CLI> doesn't show me anything useful: Executing Macro("SIP/601-8238", "dial-pstn|88097880|") in new stack Executing SetGlobalVar("SIP/601-8238",

I'm still trying to learn some parts of Asterisk, so sorry in advance for the dumb question! How do I set up an extension to dial out to the PSTN through my ZAP interfaces? I want the ability to have a ring group that will ring all of the phones in an office and then ring cell phones if nobody answers. I'm sure this is simple to do but I'm at a loss. I have tried the following

How do you enable call waiting on sip phones? Ive looked and googled and can only find call waiting pstn phones butnot for sip. Is their a way of setting this up within the dailplan?

I got two phones on an ATA-186 (601, 602) and two phones on the TDM22B (603, 604). I have two lines on the TDM22B. I cannot figure out some of the problems: 1. 601 dials via ZAP/3-1 to local phone number at PSTN: ringing pickup on PSTN (empty) still ringing in the phone set 601 2. call from PSTN back: 601 picks up ... everything works !!! No caller id shows up 3. For testing I have only one

Hello all. In the shower the other day (where most of this sort of musing gets done, eh?) I was thinking about graceful degradation of audio signals. Let me apologise in advance if these are elementary concepts or if I demonstrate a complete lack of insight -- I don't rate even a dabbler status in the area of audio codecs. Anyway: If we have a 128kbs signal coming down a *udp* channel with

I compiled SPEC CPU2006 bzip2 with Clang, and generated profiles with OPT's -insert-optimal-edge-profiling option. After a profile run, I launched OPT with -profile-loader -profile-verifier flags and also passed -O3 flag. This caused OPT to give a warning "WARNING: profile information is inconsistent with the current program!" and then fail with an assert (ASSERT:inWeight and

Dear OpenSSH Community, Please find an experimental patch for resilient SSH connections from the web page below. It enables an SSH session to continue over sequential TCP connections in case of a broken TCP connection or change of an IP address. The page also includes the related USENIX'06 paper which describes the design in detail. http://www.infrahip.net/resilient/ Best regards,

> On 09/01/2020 18:25 Kishore Potnuru <kishore.reachme at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Dovecot team,? > > I need help in configuring HA/resilence for my dovecot (POP3/IMAP) server. > > I have one RHEL Linux POP3/IMAP server with Dovecot version 2.2.10. I also installed the postfix(version: 2.6.6) in it. At present it have around 10 domains and each domain is having

You can do it using replication, https://wiki.dovecot.org/Replication but since you have no staging/test environment, I would advice you to get one. Aki > On 09/01/2020 18:45 Kishore Potnuru <kishore.reachme at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thank you Aki for the reply.? > > But I cannot disturb the version at present as it is a live server and thousands of emails will

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 06:51:36PM +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote: > You can do it using replication, > https://wiki.dovecot.org/Replication Last time I tried, it did not work with mbox. Did that change? The document does not tell about the format. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu at netbsd.org

On 10.1.2020 9.00, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 06:51:36PM +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> You can do it using replication, >> https://wiki.dovecot.org/Replication > Last time I tried, it did not work with mbox. Did that change? The > document does not tell about the format. > Replication is not supported with mbox. Most features are not. Aki

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 09:07:24AM +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Replication is not supported with mbox. Most features are not. It would be nice if the document about replication could tell what setup works. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu at netbsd.org

> On 10 Jan 2020, at 9.20, Emmanuel Dreyfus <manu at netbsd.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 09:07:24AM +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> Replication is not supported with mbox. Most features are not. > > It would be nice if the document about replication could tell > what setup works. First step in setting up HA system would be to migrate away from mbox. Sami

Hello, you need to "clone" the first server, change the ip address, mount the same maildir storage and use some mechanism to share the accounts database. Then you need to put a TCP load-balancer in front of the servers an you are good to go. This is the easiest solution if you already have in the network an appliance that can do LB. For instance if you already have a firewall with

Hello folks, I have been asked about the resilience of samba clients when faced with a domain controller failure. My client's environment has multiple Windows Domain Controllers (we'll call them dc1 - dc9). Assuming that domain replication operates as expected (and does, from Windows workstation point of view), what should I expect if (when) the domain controller that initiated a

Hi, I am using theora codec to stream video. Sometimes I am getting (due network actions- packet loss / delay) a distortion in the video image degrading its quality and I think it is something related to the video slices / chunks (dropped or disordered) of the entire frame. Are there plans for slicing and loss detection/resilience built-in theora codec? Will theora codec have a similar approach

On Friday 17 January 2003 23:29, Ricardo Galli wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > find a patch which is an update to a patch sent months ago. Before it was > in net/sock.c, now I moved it to format.c, so net CVS module is not > affected. It polls the socket before trying to send() any byte to check > if the TCP buffers are full due to

On Saturday 18 January 2003 06:55, Ricardo Galli wrote: > On Friday 17 January 2003 20:17, Karl Heyes shaped the electrons to say: > > I would suggest a slightly different approach. > > > > Instead of increasing the syscall overhead for all sockets, trapping > > for uncommon cases. Try the sock_write_bytes and if that is > > continuously having to queue (ie not