similar to: Extensions patterns algorithm

Hi R people, i'm looking for the Reciprocal Nearest Neighbour algorithm applied to Ward clustering; I know that it is explained in details in the following book: Downs, G. M.; Willett, P. In Advanced Computer-Assisted Techniques in Drug Discovery; van de Waterbeemd, H., Ed.; VCH: Weinheim, 1994; Vol. 3. but cannot order copies it without knowing the pages involved; could someone

LLVM performs a greedy, bottom-up instruction selection. At each step, it selects the pattern that will absorb the most nodes (roughly: the order can be tweaked by the target using AddedComplexity, which is often used to model the idea that a particular pattern is more profitable than it would otherwise appear). I don’t personally think there is that much to gain from an algorithm significantly

Hi Ivan, Matcher table generation which is implemented in utils/DAGISelEmitter.cpp does use heusiristics like number of instructions which a pattern will cover, latency (not the one which Targets scheduling defines) while emitting the candidate patterns for a give dag node. Current implications may not be implication of algorithm in toto though. Thanks, Jatin On Wednesday, March 28, 2018, Ivan

Is the algorithm described in the article "Near-Optimal Instruction Selection on DAGs (https://llvm.org/pubs/2008-CGO-DagISel.html)" really used in llvm instruction selection? I've studied implementation (SelectionDAGISel.cpp) and I see that instructions are selected by target specific MatcherTable generated by llvm-tblgen. In the implementation the first matching pattern from

Mersenne Twister generator is known to be sensitive to the algorithm used to generate its initial state. The initialization used in R generates the initial state in a way, which leaves linear dependencies mod 2 among the bits in the initial state. Since Mersenne Twister performs only operations, which are linear mod 2, these dependencies propagate to the output sequence. An easy to see

How can I execute an EAGI script with params from extensions.conf Example python script: InfMsg -s 1 in my extensions.conf exten => 492,1,Answer exten => 492,2,eagi,InfMsg -s 1 exten => 492,3,Hangup() It doesn?t work my * report... -- Executing [92@telpin-112:2] EAGI("Zap/4-1", "InfMsg -s 1") in new stack -- Launched AGI Script /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/InfMsg

Dear Sir, I am a R beginning user. I would like to apply the bagging algorithm to my data in order to classify a certain disease by Bagging Support Vector Machine Ensemble. My problem is that even if I am reading the book, looking at the examples in internet and available in R, learning a lot of theoretical things on about SVM esemble or Bagging method, I can't apply Bagged SVM esemble or

This is great! Thanks Paul! I think that the 9x reduction in compile-time is well worth the 4% size increase. TableGen's run-time has been a sore point and a source of complaints for quite some time. -- Krzysztof Parzyszek kparzysz at quicinc.com AI tools development -----Original Message----- From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Paul C.

Hi all, new to the list and this is probably a basic question and couldn't find anything clear googling around but I don't know how to handle calls to sip extensions not defined on sip.conf while using pattern matching. On my example I have sip extensions 10, 11, 12, and 13 on sip.conf. On a basic extension.conf I set up a pattern starting with "1" and a second digit should dial

This is the size of the table, not the size of the overall binary, right? I would imagine that a 4% growth in the size of the table is a substantially smaller growth in the total executable size of, say, clang. If the overall growth is minuscule (say, under 1%), then this seems like the clear path forward. I’m also optimistic that we might be able to find other ways to shrink the tables to make

A rather notorious aspect of TableGen is the time required to run the -emit-dag-isel backend on some targets, including AMDGPU and X86. I added a timing feature to TableGen and timed the AMDGPU run. ===-------------------------------------------------------------------------=== TableGen Phase Timing

Hi I have a problem with substitutions involving named backreferences. I have a vector American.dates: > American.dates [1] "5/15/1976" "2.15.1970" "1.9.2006" which I want to change into British.dates: > British.dates [1] "15/5/1976" "15/2/1970" "9/1/2006" I know I can do it like this:

I just reviewed the EXCLUDE PATTERNS section of the manpage and found that the declarative portion never actually states that only the part of the path that is relative destination is compared. I'm not quite satisfied with my text on this so if anyone has a better way of stating it i'm open to suggestions. Index: rsync.yo

I wouldn't want to be too hasty about simply removing the relaxation algorithm. The size and speed of the compiler affects all users, but the time to compile the compiler "only" affects us compiler developers. And I speak as a developer who is heavily affected by the time to compile the AMDGPU backend. One off-the-cuff idea (I haven't even looked at the code yet): could we pass

I need to match an incoming call based on a prefixed string, and this solution was suggested to me some time back. exten => _conf.,1,Answer exten => _conf.,2,MeetMe(${EXTEN:4}|d) exten => _conf.,3,Hangup However incoming calls never match this pattern, and I cannot find any evidence in the wiki or on google that such a pattern is valid. I'm currently running a SVN trunk, but have

Hi, I just subscribe to ask you a question about patterns in exclude-include files. I just want some folders to be rsynced to a remote machine. What I tried is : IncludeFile ------------------------- /etc/ /var/lib/zope/ - /* ----------------------- result of $$ rsync -avvrn --delete --delete-excluded --include-from=/backup-include -e ssh / /backup is expand file_list to 4000 bytes, did move

Hi, There seem to be 2 sets of block coding patterns in the VP3x/Theora algorithm. Based on the comments in the code, the first pattern is used if encoder version < 6 and the second pattern is used in encoder version >= 6. None of the code to support the second pattern is ever called. Is there an encoder with a version >= 6? The code in question is

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 |Carlos Molina <cmolina@net-uno.net> wrote: | |>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |>Hash: SHA1 |> |>Greetings. |> |>I'm trying to make some backups using rsync, but I have some questions |>about it. |> |>First, on the receiving side, i make a test with this line. |> |>rsync -vv -e ssh --recursive

I do not have access to a subtraction routine, as it is considered add with negation on the second parameter, so I have this pattern: // integer subtraction // a - b ==> a + (-b) def ISUB : Pat<(sub GPRI32:$src0, GPRI32:$src1), (IADD GPRI32:$src0, (INEGATE GPRI32:$src1))>; I am attemping to do 64 bit integer shifts and using the following pattern: def LSHL :

On Sep 23, 2008, at 7:17 PM, David Greene wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: >> On Sep 23, 2008, at 11:26 AM, David Greene wrote: >> >>> Are there any examples of using tablegen to generate multiple >>> machine >>> instructions from a single pattern? Or do these cases always have >>> to be >>> manually expanded? >> >> PPC has a