similar to: [asterisk-dev] MeetMe feature request: bypass pincode

First off, not a dev question, redirecting to -user. On Sun, 19 Jul 2009, Emrah wrote: > Would it be possible to imagine an option that avoids the need of > entering the pin code of a conference room? Unless I'm misunderstanding you, just create the meetme without requiring a pin. See: [core] show application meetme or whatever random order of words makes sense to your version

Hello everyone! I am currently in the middle of writing an article on converting from AgentCallbackLogin() dialplan application (which is deprecated as of 1.4, and removed in the 1.6.x series of Asterisk) to using the AddQueueMember(), and other dialplan based methods of performing the same functionality. However, after looking at the AgentCallbackLogin() application, it seems there is a

Jared Smith, Jim van Meggelen, and Leif Madsen of the Asterisk Documentation Project, in conjunction with O'Reilly Media are pleased to announce the official release of Asterisk: The Future of Telephony on Friday, October 14, 2005 at AstriCon 2005 in Anaheim, CA. In the true spirit of Open Source, the authors and O'Reilly Media have published the book under the open, Creative Commons

hi, I am trying to get the usernum of a user when dialing in to a MeetMe conference. Is there somehow a possibility to save the usernum of a MeetMe participant into a variable? Everything should be done through the DialPlan, no manager and no *cli. Thanks for your help, Emrah

First off this is not my work for extensions.conf it is modified from http://leifmadsen.wordpress.com/2009/07/15/migrating-from-agentcallbackl ogin-to-standard-dialplan-methods-part-1/ So credit to Leif Madsen <http://www.leifmadsen.com> But as to my question [AgentLogin] ;A replaced version of AgentCallbackLogin() using a GoSub() ; exten =>

Hi, I think there is an essential option of the Voicemail application that is missing. I would like to suggest the implementation of a function to give the user the ability to either allow or disallow the recording of messages. If the ability to record a message is disabled, options u, s, and b must not be considered in order to avoid the playback of messages such as "Please leave your

Hi, I remember reading that Asterisk allows only 100 simultaneous calls. Is that correct? If it is so, how is it possible to have a conference call with more then 100 users? I think I read here that some people managed to have 500 people in a conf room... Or, how do I increase this limit? Is it as easy as changing a value in a config.h? Thanks for your help, Emrah

Hi Rolf, this topic is probably already saturated, but here is a tidyverse solution: ``` library(purrr) x <- list( ? `1` = c(7, 13, 1, 4, 10), ? `2` = c(2, 5,? 14, 8, 11), ? `3` = c(6, 9, 15, 12, 3) ) x |> ? pmap(~ c(..1, ..2, ..3)) |> ? reduce(c) #> [1]? 7? 2? 6 13? 5? 9? 1 14 15? 4? 8 12 10 11? 3 ``` Here, we map over the elements of the list in parallel (hence pmap),

I'm hoping someone can help me out with this. I am basically just trying to separate my outbound and inbound calls into separate contexts instead of having everything in a single context. Any help would be appreciated. Perhaps I've missed something really obvious.... Here is the network layout: <remote> <--TDM400P--> <nattedbox> <--IAX--> <liveipbox>

Sorry to append, but I just realised that of course ``` x |> ? pmap(c) |> ? reduce(c) |> ? unname() ``` also works and is a general solution in case your list has more than three elements. Here, we map in parallel over all elements of the list, always combining the current set of elements into a vector, and then reduce the resulting list into a vector by combining the elements

Hi Mark, Are you still having audio problems between outside SIP channels? Make sure that you have set the following for all SIP channels in your sip.conf canreinvite=no -- sudhir > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:46:22 -0400 > From: Leif Madsen <leif.madsen@gmail.com> > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Nat...again.... >

Thanks for your reply. canreinvite has been set to "no" from the beginning...still no luck. Maybe I'll be able to take a trace of it tonight...we'll see...but any thoughts at all are appreciated! -Mark > > Hi Mark, > > Are you still having audio problems between outside SIP channels? Make > sure that you have set the following for all SIP channels in your

I see a book coming: "666 ways to do the same thing in R ranked by sexiness." Kidding aside, if you look under the covers of some of the functions we are using, we may find we are taking steps back as some of them use others and perhaps more functionality than we need. But for a new reader , looking at many approaches may open up other ways and ideas and see the problem space as quite

Hi Leif, Thanks for the information. I checked the /tmp/ folder and there was core #### files and I tried to back trace it but it was not showing the cause of that crash, but anyhow, I upgraded our Asterisk system to 1.4.22.1 and from past few days its going on fine. I have also researched and found that version 1.4.17/18.1 had the issue of channel stuck up as well as random asterisk crashes.

For reasons best known only to myself ( :-) ) I wish to create a data frame with 0 rows and 9 columns. The best I've been able to come up with is: junk <- as.data.frame(matrix(0,nrow=0,ncol=9)) Is there a sexier way? cheers, Rolf ###################################################################### Attention:\ This e-mail message is privileged and confid...{{dropped:9}}

I want to do something like: TH <- sprintf("%1.1f",c(0.3,0.5,0.7,0.9,1)) plot(1:10) legend("bottomright",pch=1:5,legend=parse(text=paste("theta ==",TH))) Notice that the final "1" comes out in the legend as just plain "1" and NOT as "1.0" although TH is [1] "0.3" "0.5" "0.7" "0.9"

A colleague asked me if there is a way to specify with a ***variable*** (say ``cflag'') whether there is an intercept in a linear model. She had in mind something like lm(y ~ x - cflag) where cflag could be 0 or 1; if it's 0 an intercept should be fitted, if it's 1 then no intercept. This doesn't work ``of course''. The cflag just gets treated as another predictor

All, I have been beating my head against a wall trying to figure out how I would implement a separate moderator code and participant code for the same conference using meetme, the deal is I dont want the participants to be able to join until the moderator is in the conference. Is it possible to do this using the apps as they are , or is their a way to use an Agi script, is that the only way?

Avi I fear this was all a huge social experiment. Testing if a post titled "sexy way" would increase engagement... On Sat, 28 Sep 2024, 07:21 , <avi.e.gross at gmail.com> wrote: > I see a book coming: > "666 ways to do the same thing in R ranked by sexiness." > > Kidding aside, if you look under the covers of some of the functions we > are

Calum, I know Rolf for a while so I will not accept any calumny about his intentions. He stated what he wanted, albeit imperfectly, and interacted with us as we came up with ideas. I have seen others who ask some open-ended question, often using a brand new idea, and do not interact. Some rumors have it that there may be motives ranging from wasting everyone?s time to gathering the best